Audit 342419

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$11.43M
Findings
2
Programs
20
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-02-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
523130 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I
1099572 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
VGR7DM974S55 Michael Madden Auditee
9708744438 Dmitriy Chernyak Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in the financial statements. The District does not charge a de minimis indirect cost rate. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Delta County Joint School District 50J, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or fund balance, or cash flows of the District. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Non-cash expenditures are included in the schedule. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: District did not use the de minimis rate on grants. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in the financial statements. The District does not charge a de minimis indirect cost rate. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or fund balance, or cash flows of the District. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Non-cash expenditures are included in the schedule.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in the financial statements. The District does not charge a de minimis indirect cost rate. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Delta County Joint School District 50J, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or fund balance, or cash flows of the District. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Non-cash expenditures are included in the schedule. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: District did not use the de minimis rate on grants. Governmental fund types account for the majority of the District’s federal grant activity. Expenditures reported in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are recognized on a modified basis of accounting. Subrecipient expenditures are recorded on a cash basis. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or limited as to reimbursement. Non-cash expenditures are included in the schedule.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in the financial statements. The District does not charge a de minimis indirect cost rate. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Delta County Joint School District 50J, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or fund balance, or cash flows of the District. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Non-cash expenditures are included in the schedule. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: District did not use the de minimis rate on grants. The District has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Criteria: 2 CFR 200.319 states that all procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with Federal procurement standards. 2 CFR 200.214 states in part that recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 in part states that a recipient of a Federal award must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award. Condition: We have selected and tested three of the largest vendors from the Child Nutrition Cluster for compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. We identified that one vendor was not properly procured, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319–2 CFR 200.324. As a result, the District incurred questioned costs in the amount of $31,401.63, which was in excess of $25,000 Federal requirement, based on 2 CFR 200.516. Also, the District did not perform procedures to verify suspension and debarment on the same vendor. Cause: District’s internal controls over procurement in the Child Nutrition Cluster were properly designed but not operating effectively to verify that all vendors are properly procured and verified for suspension and debarment. The District did not properly procure one vendor within the Child Nutrition Cluster that incurred questioned costs in excess of the $25,000 threshold, based on 2 CFR 200.516. Effect: The District did not properly procure one vendor within the Child Nutrition Cluster that incurred questioned costs in excess of the $25,000 threshold, based on 2 CFR 200.516, and, as a result, revealed a significant deficiency in internal controls over procurement in the Child Nutrition Cluster. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the District re-evaluate the procurement processes in the Child Nutrition Services program and re-evaluate the design of internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to be in compliance with the Federal requirements and the District’s procurement policy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.319 states that all procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with Federal procurement standards. 2 CFR 200.214 states in part that recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations. In addition, 2 CFR 200.303 in part states that a recipient of a Federal award must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award. Condition: We have selected and tested three of the largest vendors from the Child Nutrition Cluster for compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. We identified that one vendor was not properly procured, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319–2 CFR 200.324. As a result, the District incurred questioned costs in the amount of $31,401.63, which was in excess of $25,000 Federal requirement, based on 2 CFR 200.516. Also, the District did not perform procedures to verify suspension and debarment on the same vendor. Cause: District’s internal controls over procurement in the Child Nutrition Cluster were properly designed but not operating effectively to verify that all vendors are properly procured and verified for suspension and debarment. The District did not properly procure one vendor within the Child Nutrition Cluster that incurred questioned costs in excess of the $25,000 threshold, based on 2 CFR 200.516. Effect: The District did not properly procure one vendor within the Child Nutrition Cluster that incurred questioned costs in excess of the $25,000 threshold, based on 2 CFR 200.516, and, as a result, revealed a significant deficiency in internal controls over procurement in the Child Nutrition Cluster. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the District re-evaluate the procurement processes in the Child Nutrition Services program and re-evaluate the design of internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to be in compliance with the Federal requirements and the District’s procurement policy.