Audit 341786

FY End
2024-08-31
Total Expended
$3.02M
Findings
8
Programs
13
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-02-10

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
522509 2024-001 Material Weakness - J
522510 2024-002 Material Weakness - F
522511 2024-003 Material Weakness - J
522512 2024-004 - - J
1098951 2024-001 Material Weakness - J
1098952 2024-002 Material Weakness - F
1098953 2024-003 Material Weakness - J
1098954 2024-004 - - J

Contacts

Name Title Type
RFZJLCK6XP44 Bart Blair Auditee
9032638050 Johnna McNeal Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Carthage Independent School District has elected to not use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of Chisum Independent School District and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. Federal grants funds are considered to be earned to the extent of expenditures made under the provisions of the grant and accordingly when such funds are received, they are recorded as deferred revenues until earned. The Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CFDA 10.565) received like-kind goods. The monetary value of these goods was $82,198 for the year ended August 31, 2024. This monetary value was reported on the schedule. The District participates in numerous state and federal grant programs governed by various rules and regulations of the grantor agencies. Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. Costs charged to the respective grant programs are subject to audit and adjustment by the grantor agencies; therefore, to the extent that the District has not complied with the rules and regulations governing the grants, if any, refunds of any money received may be required and the collectability of any related receivable at August 31, 2024, may be impaired. Negative amounts shown, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. In the opinion of the District, there are no significant contingent liabilities relating to compliance with the rules and regulations governing the respective grants; therefore, no provision has been recorded in the accompanying basic financial statements for such contingency. Carthage Independent School District has elected to not use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Reconciliation of Federal Awards The following reconciles federal expenditures per the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) to the federal revenue reported on Exhibit C-2: Federal expenditures per SEFA $ 3,016,220 SHARS 195,810 Federal revenue per Exhibit C-2 $ 3,212,030

Finding Details

Criteria: Districts are to request reimbursement for actual meals served to students through the National School Lunch and Breakfast program. The student must be present and provided the meal. Condition: During the period between August 2023 and September 2023, the district served congregate breakfast meals to the elementary campus. Instead of reporting the number of actual meals served to students in attendance each day the district reported the meal count and requested reimbursement based on the number of students enrolled in the classroom. No adjustment was made for student absences. Cause: The staff person preparing the request for reimbursement NSLP Claim for Reimbursement was not properly trained as to what qualified as a reimbursable meal. There was a lack of review and internal control as well as segregation of duties over the recording of meals served through the request for reimbursement process. Effect: The District was required to reimburse TEA $90,071.12 related to the compliance violation.
Criteria: Districts are required by the Texas Department of Agriculture to obtain prior approval for the purchase of capital assets (equipment) with a cost of $5,000 or greater. Condition: The district failed to obtain the prior approval for the purchase of 8 equipment items. As listed below for a total of $134,020. $7,522.00 HVAC 8,900.00 Humidified Holding Cabinet 26,241.50 Heat Pump System 26,241.50 Heat Pump System 26,241.50 Heat Pump System 26,241.50 Heat Pump System 6,301.00 Ice Machine 6,301.00 Ice Machine $134,020.00 Cause: Management did not have clear job duties established as to who was responsible for obtaining the approval. The staff of the District were not properly educated on the requirements of the program. The internal controls of the district were not effectively designed and implemented to mitigate the risk of non-compliance. Effect: The District is at risk of being required to cover the cost of assets purchased without approval from resources of the general fund or the capital projects fund. The District was not incompliance with the rules related to procurement for the National School Lunch and Breakfast Program as administered by the Texas Department of Agriculture. Questioned Cost Identified: $134,020
Criteria: Districts are to design and implement internal controls over the collection of local revenue, in particular, the fees for student reduced and full-price meals and ala cart items, as well as adult meals purchased. These internal controls should include segregation of duties at the campus level as well as management review and approval at the central office. Districts are required to reimburse from the general fund any unpaid meals at year end where students were allowed to charge but never paid for their meal. Condition: Upon initial review and analytical procedures performed during the planning stage of the audit we noted only $71,126 in local revenue in the food service program related to monies collected by the district at the campus level for full and reduced-priced student breakfast and lunch as well as any ala cart items and including meal served to teachers and other adults. Management’s initial response to our inquiry as to the low amount of collection was that participation was low in the food service program in general. We performed a predictive test to calculate the amount of local revenue expected based on the meal prices and the number of meals noted as served to students from the system designs report for the number of meals served for the year ended August 31, 2024. We calculated we should have collected $131,700 in local revenue, resulting in a difference of $60,582.49 of revenue booked. We also noted the District purged from the point of sale system the negative balance of 993 students who had been allowed to accumulate $54,724 in charges during the year under audit. Students were allowed to charge their meals, and no attempt was made to collect the balances due from the students. Per management the write-off of unpaid balances annually has been in practice for multiple years the amount of write-off for the year ended August 31, 2023, was $50,272. Cause: There is a lack of segregation of duties related to the food service program. There is a lack of review, reconciliation and management oversight at the central office level of the activity in the food service program in general. No one at any level within the district was properly monitoring the local collections of monies for the meals provided. There is a lack of knowledge of the rules and requirements of the food service program. Effect: Some but not all local revenue for which the district is entitled is being collected and deposited into the district’s accounts. The District must reimburse the Food Service Fund $54,724, for fiscal year August 31, 2024 write-offs as well as $50,272 for August 31, 2023 write-offs.
Criteria: Schools are required to charge a minimum price for lunches. This minimum price is calculated annually using the Paid Lunch Equity (PLE) Tool provided by the USDA. School that choose to contribute non-Federal sources to the non-profit school food service account in lieu of raising paid lunch prices must calculate the appropriate amount to contribute. Condition: The District charged $2.50 for lunch at the high school and junior high campus and $2.00 at the lower grade campuses. The PLE minimum price per meal was $2.95. The District did not charge the minimum lunch price. Cause: The staff of the District were not properly trained on the requirement, and no administrative level staff person was assigned the responsibility to oversee this compliance. Effect: The estimated required contribution from the general fund to the food service fund is $25,000 based on approximately 50,000 meals served without a price increase.
Criteria: Districts are to request reimbursement for actual meals served to students through the National School Lunch and Breakfast program. The student must be present and provided the meal. Condition: During the period between August 2023 and September 2023, the district served congregate breakfast meals to the elementary campus. Instead of reporting the number of actual meals served to students in attendance each day the district reported the meal count and requested reimbursement based on the number of students enrolled in the classroom. No adjustment was made for student absences. Cause: The staff person preparing the request for reimbursement NSLP Claim for Reimbursement was not properly trained as to what qualified as a reimbursable meal. There was a lack of review and internal control as well as segregation of duties over the recording of meals served through the request for reimbursement process. Effect: The District was required to reimburse TEA $90,071.12 related to the compliance violation.
Criteria: Districts are required by the Texas Department of Agriculture to obtain prior approval for the purchase of capital assets (equipment) with a cost of $5,000 or greater. Condition: The district failed to obtain the prior approval for the purchase of 8 equipment items. As listed below for a total of $134,020. $7,522.00 HVAC 8,900.00 Humidified Holding Cabinet 26,241.50 Heat Pump System 26,241.50 Heat Pump System 26,241.50 Heat Pump System 26,241.50 Heat Pump System 6,301.00 Ice Machine 6,301.00 Ice Machine $134,020.00 Cause: Management did not have clear job duties established as to who was responsible for obtaining the approval. The staff of the District were not properly educated on the requirements of the program. The internal controls of the district were not effectively designed and implemented to mitigate the risk of non-compliance. Effect: The District is at risk of being required to cover the cost of assets purchased without approval from resources of the general fund or the capital projects fund. The District was not incompliance with the rules related to procurement for the National School Lunch and Breakfast Program as administered by the Texas Department of Agriculture. Questioned Cost Identified: $134,020
Criteria: Districts are to design and implement internal controls over the collection of local revenue, in particular, the fees for student reduced and full-price meals and ala cart items, as well as adult meals purchased. These internal controls should include segregation of duties at the campus level as well as management review and approval at the central office. Districts are required to reimburse from the general fund any unpaid meals at year end where students were allowed to charge but never paid for their meal. Condition: Upon initial review and analytical procedures performed during the planning stage of the audit we noted only $71,126 in local revenue in the food service program related to monies collected by the district at the campus level for full and reduced-priced student breakfast and lunch as well as any ala cart items and including meal served to teachers and other adults. Management’s initial response to our inquiry as to the low amount of collection was that participation was low in the food service program in general. We performed a predictive test to calculate the amount of local revenue expected based on the meal prices and the number of meals noted as served to students from the system designs report for the number of meals served for the year ended August 31, 2024. We calculated we should have collected $131,700 in local revenue, resulting in a difference of $60,582.49 of revenue booked. We also noted the District purged from the point of sale system the negative balance of 993 students who had been allowed to accumulate $54,724 in charges during the year under audit. Students were allowed to charge their meals, and no attempt was made to collect the balances due from the students. Per management the write-off of unpaid balances annually has been in practice for multiple years the amount of write-off for the year ended August 31, 2023, was $50,272. Cause: There is a lack of segregation of duties related to the food service program. There is a lack of review, reconciliation and management oversight at the central office level of the activity in the food service program in general. No one at any level within the district was properly monitoring the local collections of monies for the meals provided. There is a lack of knowledge of the rules and requirements of the food service program. Effect: Some but not all local revenue for which the district is entitled is being collected and deposited into the district’s accounts. The District must reimburse the Food Service Fund $54,724, for fiscal year August 31, 2024 write-offs as well as $50,272 for August 31, 2023 write-offs.
Criteria: Schools are required to charge a minimum price for lunches. This minimum price is calculated annually using the Paid Lunch Equity (PLE) Tool provided by the USDA. School that choose to contribute non-Federal sources to the non-profit school food service account in lieu of raising paid lunch prices must calculate the appropriate amount to contribute. Condition: The District charged $2.50 for lunch at the high school and junior high campus and $2.00 at the lower grade campuses. The PLE minimum price per meal was $2.95. The District did not charge the minimum lunch price. Cause: The staff of the District were not properly trained on the requirement, and no administrative level staff person was assigned the responsibility to oversee this compliance. Effect: The estimated required contribution from the general fund to the food service fund is $25,000 based on approximately 50,000 meals served without a price increase.