Audit 341157

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$2.28M
Findings
16
Programs
16
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-02-04

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
521196 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
521197 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
521198 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
521199 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
521200 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - L
521201 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - L
521202 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - L
521203 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - L
1097638 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
1097639 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
1097640 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
1097641 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - L
1097642 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - L
1097643 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - L
1097644 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - L
1097645 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
GSBMFHSSMXE8 Tanner Simmons Auditee
5036308606 Tara Kamp Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The entity has not elected to use the ten percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes federal grant activity under programs of the federal government. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations, it is not intended to and does not present the net position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the entity.
Title: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The entity has not elected to use the ten percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The entity has not elected to use the ten percent de minimus indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

SA-2024-03 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP claims that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted and any reviews that may have occurred were not documented. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be reviewed before submission and reviews should be documented. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are properly reviewed before being submitted, there exists the possibility of material misstatements in the financial statements. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and date. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District did not practice a multi-step review of monthly Child Nutrition Program meal claims to the state. This has since been corrected, with monthly data input and review by the Director of Nutrition Services, and review and submission by the District's Director of Finance/Senior Accountant. This ensures that the numbers that are being submitted to the state are accurate with the numbers that are being recorded on a daily/monthly basis. This was implemented early in fiscal year.
SA-2024-03 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP claims that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted and any reviews that may have occurred were not documented. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be reviewed before submission and reviews should be documented. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are properly reviewed before being submitted, there exists the possibility of material misstatements in the financial statements. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and date. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District did not practice a multi-step review of monthly Child Nutrition Program meal claims to the state. This has since been corrected, with monthly data input and review by the Director of Nutrition Services, and review and submission by the District's Director of Finance/Senior Accountant. This ensures that the numbers that are being submitted to the state are accurate with the numbers that are being recorded on a daily/monthly basis. This was implemented early in fiscal year.
SA-2024-03 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP claims that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted and any reviews that may have occurred were not documented. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be reviewed before submission and reviews should be documented. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are properly reviewed before being submitted, there exists the possibility of material misstatements in the financial statements. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and date. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District did not practice a multi-step review of monthly Child Nutrition Program meal claims to the state. This has since been corrected, with monthly data input and review by the Director of Nutrition Services, and review and submission by the District's Director of Finance/Senior Accountant. This ensures that the numbers that are being submitted to the state are accurate with the numbers that are being recorded on a daily/monthly basis. This was implemented early in fiscal year.
SA-2024-03 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP claims that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted and any reviews that may have occurred were not documented. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be reviewed before submission and reviews should be documented. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are properly reviewed before being submitted, there exists the possibility of material misstatements in the financial statements. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and date. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District did not practice a multi-step review of monthly Child Nutrition Program meal claims to the state. This has since been corrected, with monthly data input and review by the Director of Nutrition Services, and review and submission by the District's Director of Finance/Senior Accountant. This ensures that the numbers that are being submitted to the state are accurate with the numbers that are being recorded on a daily/monthly basis. This was implemented early in fiscal year.
SA-2024-04 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be recorded to the correctfiscal year in the general ledger.CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP reimbursements, the District recorded the May 2024 and June 2024 claims to the incorrect fiscal year. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be recorded in the correct fiscal year. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are recorded in the correct fiscal year, there exists the possibility of material misstatement to the financial statement and non compliance to the grant. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Reimbursements from the state for meal claims for the months of May and June were received in July 2024 (in the new fiscal year). Due to turnover in the District's business office, they were recorded when they were received (as revenue) rather than accounts receivable. Moving forward, the District will recognize meal reimbursement revenue in the fiscal year that it is for, and the proper amounts will be applied to the proper accounts, and confirmed via multi-step review. This will take affect starting in fiscal year 24-25.
SA-2024-04 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be recorded to the correctfiscal year in the general ledger.CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP reimbursements, the District recorded the May 2024 and June 2024 claims to the incorrect fiscal year. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be recorded in the correct fiscal year. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are recorded in the correct fiscal year, there exists the possibility of material misstatement to the financial statement and non compliance to the grant. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Reimbursements from the state for meal claims for the months of May and June were received in July 2024 (in the new fiscal year). Due to turnover in the District's business office, they were recorded when they were received (as revenue) rather than accounts receivable. Moving forward, the District will recognize meal reimbursement revenue in the fiscal year that it is for, and the proper amounts will be applied to the proper accounts, and confirmed via multi-step review. This will take affect starting in fiscal year 24-25.
SA-2024-04 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be recorded to the correctfiscal year in the general ledger.CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP reimbursements, the District recorded the May 2024 and June 2024 claims to the incorrect fiscal year. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be recorded in the correct fiscal year. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are recorded in the correct fiscal year, there exists the possibility of material misstatement to the financial statement and non compliance to the grant. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Reimbursements from the state for meal claims for the months of May and June were received in July 2024 (in the new fiscal year). Due to turnover in the District's business office, they were recorded when they were received (as revenue) rather than accounts receivable. Moving forward, the District will recognize meal reimbursement revenue in the fiscal year that it is for, and the proper amounts will be applied to the proper accounts, and confirmed via multi-step review. This will take affect starting in fiscal year 24-25.
SA-2024-04 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be recorded to the correctfiscal year in the general ledger.CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP reimbursements, the District recorded the May 2024 and June 2024 claims to the incorrect fiscal year. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be recorded in the correct fiscal year. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are recorded in the correct fiscal year, there exists the possibility of material misstatement to the financial statement and non compliance to the grant. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Reimbursements from the state for meal claims for the months of May and June were received in July 2024 (in the new fiscal year). Due to turnover in the District's business office, they were recorded when they were received (as revenue) rather than accounts receivable. Moving forward, the District will recognize meal reimbursement revenue in the fiscal year that it is for, and the proper amounts will be applied to the proper accounts, and confirmed via multi-step review. This will take affect starting in fiscal year 24-25.
SA-2024-03 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP claims that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted and any reviews that may have occurred were not documented. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be reviewed before submission and reviews should be documented. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are properly reviewed before being submitted, there exists the possibility of material misstatements in the financial statements. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and date. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District did not practice a multi-step review of monthly Child Nutrition Program meal claims to the state. This has since been corrected, with monthly data input and review by the Director of Nutrition Services, and review and submission by the District's Director of Finance/Senior Accountant. This ensures that the numbers that are being submitted to the state are accurate with the numbers that are being recorded on a daily/monthly basis. This was implemented early in fiscal year.
SA-2024-03 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP claims that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted and any reviews that may have occurred were not documented. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be reviewed before submission and reviews should be documented. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are properly reviewed before being submitted, there exists the possibility of material misstatements in the financial statements. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and date. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District did not practice a multi-step review of monthly Child Nutrition Program meal claims to the state. This has since been corrected, with monthly data input and review by the Director of Nutrition Services, and review and submission by the District's Director of Finance/Senior Accountant. This ensures that the numbers that are being submitted to the state are accurate with the numbers that are being recorded on a daily/monthly basis. This was implemented early in fiscal year.
SA-2024-03 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP claims that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted and any reviews that may have occurred were not documented. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be reviewed before submission and reviews should be documented. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are properly reviewed before being submitted, there exists the possibility of material misstatements in the financial statements. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and date. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District did not practice a multi-step review of monthly Child Nutrition Program meal claims to the state. This has since been corrected, with monthly data input and review by the Director of Nutrition Services, and review and submission by the District's Director of Finance/Senior Accountant. This ensures that the numbers that are being submitted to the state are accurate with the numbers that are being recorded on a daily/monthly basis. This was implemented early in fiscal year.
SA-2024-03 – SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be reviewed by a person other than the preparer. CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP claims that claims were not being reviewed before being submitted and any reviews that may have occurred were not documented. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be reviewed before submission and reviews should be documented. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are properly reviewed before being submitted, there exists the possibility of material misstatements in the financial statements. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District use someone other than the claim preparer to review the claims before being submitted, and document said review with initials and date. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: The District did not practice a multi-step review of monthly Child Nutrition Program meal claims to the state. This has since been corrected, with monthly data input and review by the Director of Nutrition Services, and review and submission by the District's Director of Finance/Senior Accountant. This ensures that the numbers that are being submitted to the state are accurate with the numbers that are being recorded on a daily/monthly basis. This was implemented early in fiscal year.
SA-2024-04 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be recorded to the correctfiscal year in the general ledger.CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP reimbursements, the District recorded the May 2024 and June 2024 claims to the incorrect fiscal year. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be recorded in the correct fiscal year. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are recorded in the correct fiscal year, there exists the possibility of material misstatement to the financial statement and non compliance to the grant. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Reimbursements from the state for meal claims for the months of May and June were received in July 2024 (in the new fiscal year). Due to turnover in the District's business office, they were recorded when they were received (as revenue) rather than accounts receivable. Moving forward, the District will recognize meal reimbursement revenue in the fiscal year that it is for, and the proper amounts will be applied to the proper accounts, and confirmed via multi-step review. This will take affect starting in fiscal year 24-25.
SA-2024-04 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be recorded to the correctfiscal year in the general ledger.CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP reimbursements, the District recorded the May 2024 and June 2024 claims to the incorrect fiscal year. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be recorded in the correct fiscal year. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are recorded in the correct fiscal year, there exists the possibility of material misstatement to the financial statement and non compliance to the grant. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Reimbursements from the state for meal claims for the months of May and June were received in July 2024 (in the new fiscal year). Due to turnover in the District's business office, they were recorded when they were received (as revenue) rather than accounts receivable. Moving forward, the District will recognize meal reimbursement revenue in the fiscal year that it is for, and the proper amounts will be applied to the proper accounts, and confirmed via multi-step review. This will take affect starting in fiscal year 24-25.
SA-2024-04 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be recorded to the correctfiscal year in the general ledger.CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP reimbursements, the District recorded the May 2024 and June 2024 claims to the incorrect fiscal year. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be recorded in the correct fiscal year. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are recorded in the correct fiscal year, there exists the possibility of material misstatement to the financial statement and non compliance to the grant. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Reimbursements from the state for meal claims for the months of May and June were received in July 2024 (in the new fiscal year). Due to turnover in the District's business office, they were recorded when they were received (as revenue) rather than accounts receivable. Moving forward, the District will recognize meal reimbursement revenue in the fiscal year that it is for, and the proper amounts will be applied to the proper accounts, and confirmed via multi-step review. This will take affect starting in fiscal year 24-25.
SA-2024-04 - SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Child Nutrition Cluster SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal reimbursement claims are required to be recorded to the correctfiscal year in the general ledger.CONDITION: We noted in our testing of NSLP reimbursements, the District recorded the May 2024 and June 2024 claims to the incorrect fiscal year. CRITERIA: NSLP claims should be recorded in the correct fiscal year. EFFECT: Without controls in place to make sure NSLP claims are recorded in the correct fiscal year, there exists the possibility of material misstatement to the financial statement and non compliance to the grant. CAUSE: The finance office experienced turn over in the fiscal year under audit. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District record reimbursements in the correct fiscal year. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: Reimbursements from the state for meal claims for the months of May and June were received in July 2024 (in the new fiscal year). Due to turnover in the District's business office, they were recorded when they were received (as revenue) rather than accounts receivable. Moving forward, the District will recognize meal reimbursement revenue in the fiscal year that it is for, and the proper amounts will be applied to the proper accounts, and confirmed via multi-step review. This will take affect starting in fiscal year 24-25.