Audit 340965

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$3.06M
Findings
6
Programs
2
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-02-03
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
521058 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes N
521059 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes N
521060 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1097500 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1097501 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes N
1097502 2024-004 Significant Deficiency Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.301 Small Rural Hospital Improvement Grant Program $13,312 - 0
10.766 Community Facilities Loans and Grants $6,434 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
MNG1KMML14E7 Joshua Christensen Auditee
6053847216 Judon Mettler Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Hospital does not draw for indirect administrative expenses and has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of Wagner Community Memorial Hospital (the Hospital) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Hospital, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Hospital.
Title: Community Facilities Loans Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Hospital does not draw for indirect administrative expenses and has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. Expenditures reported in this schedule consist of the beginning of the year outstanding balance for the direct loans and a guaranteed loan. There were no loan advances during the year ended June 30, 2024. Amounts reported on the schedule include two direct loans and a guaranteed loan. The guaranteed loan is guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture for up to 90% of the loan. Accordingly, total expenditures reported on the schedule under the guaranteed loan represent 90% of the beginning balance of the guaranteed loan. The outstanding balance at June 30, 2024 was $975,888 for the 2008 direct loan, $1,242,982 for the 2010 direct loan, and $740,593 for the 2008 guaranteed loan.

Finding Details

Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing #10.766 Community Facilities Loans and Grants Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal awards. Section 4 of the loan resolution security agreements dated September 2, 2008 and March 10, 2010 states the Hospital must set aside a reserve amount each month until the specified account balance is reached. Condition: The Hospital’s reserve account is fully funded per the requirements in the loan resolution security agreement. However, there is no documented secondary monitoring of the reserve balance as compared to the required minimum reserve balance. Cause: The reserve balance is reported within the monthly financial information provided to the board and the reserve balance is noted as “in compliance”, however, there is no documented discussion or comparison of the reserve balance to the required minimum reserve balance. The board may be unaware of changes in the reserve balance which could cause the Hospital to no longer be in compliance. Effect: The lack of formal review or approval increases the risk of employees participating in the federal award administration not detecting and correcting noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Sampling was not used. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2023‐004. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to include a comparison of the required minimum reserve balance to the actual reserve balance and documenting the requirement in the monthly financial information provided to the board. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing #10.766 Community Facilities Loans and Grants Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal awards. Section 4 of the loan resolution security agreements dated September 2, 2008 and March 10, 2010 states the Hospital must set aside a reserve amount each month until the specified account balance is reached. Condition: The Hospital’s reserve account is fully funded per the requirements in the loan resolution security agreement. However, there is no documented secondary monitoring of the reserve balance as compared to the required minimum reserve balance. Cause: The reserve balance is reported within the monthly financial information provided to the board and the reserve balance is noted as “in compliance”, however, there is no documented discussion or comparison of the reserve balance to the required minimum reserve balance. The board may be unaware of changes in the reserve balance which could cause the Hospital to no longer be in compliance. Effect: The lack of formal review or approval increases the risk of employees participating in the federal award administration not detecting and correcting noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Sampling was not used. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2023‐004. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to include a comparison of the required minimum reserve balance to the actual reserve balance and documenting the requirement in the monthly financial information provided to the board. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing #10.766 Community Facilities Loans and Grants Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal awards. Section 4 of the loan resolution security agreements dated September 2, 2008 and March 10, 2010 states the Hospital must set aside a reserve amount each month until the specified account balance is reached. Condition: The Hospital’s reserve account is fully funded per the requirements in the loan resolution security agreement. However, there is no documented secondary monitoring of the reserve balance as compared to the required minimum reserve balance. Cause: The reserve balance is reported within the monthly financial information provided to the board and the reserve balance is noted as “in compliance”, however, there is no documented discussion or comparison of the reserve balance to the required minimum reserve balance. The board may be unaware of changes in the reserve balance which could cause the Hospital to no longer be in compliance. Effect: The lack of formal review or approval increases the risk of employees participating in the federal award administration not detecting and correcting noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Sampling was not used. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2023‐004. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to include a comparison of the required minimum reserve balance to the actual reserve balance and documenting the requirement in the monthly financial information provided to the board. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing #10.766 Community Facilities Loans and Grants Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal awards. Section 4 of the loan resolution security agreements dated September 2, 2008 and March 10, 2010 states the Hospital must set aside a reserve amount each month until the specified account balance is reached. Condition: The Hospital’s reserve account is fully funded per the requirements in the loan resolution security agreement. However, there is no documented secondary monitoring of the reserve balance as compared to the required minimum reserve balance. Cause: The reserve balance is reported within the monthly financial information provided to the board and the reserve balance is noted as “in compliance”, however, there is no documented discussion or comparison of the reserve balance to the required minimum reserve balance. The board may be unaware of changes in the reserve balance which could cause the Hospital to no longer be in compliance. Effect: The lack of formal review or approval increases the risk of employees participating in the federal award administration not detecting and correcting noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Sampling was not used. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2023‐004. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to include a comparison of the required minimum reserve balance to the actual reserve balance and documenting the requirement in the monthly financial information provided to the board. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing #10.766 Community Facilities Loans and Grants Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal awards. Section 4 of the loan resolution security agreements dated September 2, 2008 and March 10, 2010 states the Hospital must set aside a reserve amount each month until the specified account balance is reached. Condition: The Hospital’s reserve account is fully funded per the requirements in the loan resolution security agreement. However, there is no documented secondary monitoring of the reserve balance as compared to the required minimum reserve balance. Cause: The reserve balance is reported within the monthly financial information provided to the board and the reserve balance is noted as “in compliance”, however, there is no documented discussion or comparison of the reserve balance to the required minimum reserve balance. The board may be unaware of changes in the reserve balance which could cause the Hospital to no longer be in compliance. Effect: The lack of formal review or approval increases the risk of employees participating in the federal award administration not detecting and correcting noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Sampling was not used. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2023‐004. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to include a comparison of the required minimum reserve balance to the actual reserve balance and documenting the requirement in the monthly financial information provided to the board. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Department of Agriculture Federal Financial Assistance Listing #10.766 Community Facilities Loans and Grants Special Tests and Provisions Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal awards. Section 4 of the loan resolution security agreements dated September 2, 2008 and March 10, 2010 states the Hospital must set aside a reserve amount each month until the specified account balance is reached. Condition: The Hospital’s reserve account is fully funded per the requirements in the loan resolution security agreement. However, there is no documented secondary monitoring of the reserve balance as compared to the required minimum reserve balance. Cause: The reserve balance is reported within the monthly financial information provided to the board and the reserve balance is noted as “in compliance”, however, there is no documented discussion or comparison of the reserve balance to the required minimum reserve balance. The board may be unaware of changes in the reserve balance which could cause the Hospital to no longer be in compliance. Effect: The lack of formal review or approval increases the risk of employees participating in the federal award administration not detecting and correcting noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Sampling was not used. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year finding 2023‐004. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to include a comparison of the required minimum reserve balance to the actual reserve balance and documenting the requirement in the monthly financial information provided to the board. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.