Audit 340951

FY End
2024-07-31
Total Expended
$1.38M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-02-03
Auditor: Adamsbrown LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
521055 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes E
1097497 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes E

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
NLN5EX1EDA14 Rebecca Clancy Auditee
6202750291 Meagan Wellbrock Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are presented in accordance with the cash basis of accounting, which is a basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance cost principles, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not utilize the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of The Russell Child Development Center, Inc. under programs of the federal government for the year ended July 31, 2024. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Center, it is not intended to and does not present the assets and net assets of the Center.
Title: Other Expenditures Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are presented in accordance with the cash basis of accounting, which is a basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance cost principles, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not utilize the de minimis cost rate. The Center did not receive any federal awards in the form of noncash assistance, insurance, loans, or loan guarantees and incurred no expenditures in relation thereof for the year ended July 31, 2024.

Finding Details

Significant Deficiency 2024-001– Child and Adult Care Food Program – 10.558 – Eligibility Criteria or specific requirement Internal controls should be in place to ensure that complete and accurate meal counts for eligible providers and children be submitted to the State for reimbursement. Condition Six providers received an improper amount for their meal reimbursement for the month tested. Context We determined, through testing of provider meal reimbursements, that an inaccurate number of meals was submitted to the State for reimbursement for six providers in our sample. Effect Two providers were incorrectly reimbursed based off incorrectly adjusted or recapped meals. Two providers had children incorrectly marked as Tier II within the system, when those children should have been reimbursed at Tier I levels. Another provider was over their licensed capacity by one child on certain days throughout the month. For the final provider, the annual enrollment update form could not be located for one child. These items totaled to a net over-reimbursement of the providers of $7. Total estimated errors come to an over-reimbursement of $200. Cause For the providers who were reimbursed based off an incorrect meal count, the first error occurred as a result of mis-keying the provider’s handwritten meal counts into the software. The other error occurred as a result of an error made when making manual adjustments within the software, due to exceptions for capacity. For the providers who had children incorrectly marked as Tier II, the first provider did not have the child correctly marked as Tier I within the software system. The second provider had two children who were entered as Tier I, but the system was not properly recognizing that status. The two final instances noted for being over license capacity and a missing enrollment form were caused by human error. Recommendation Controls should be reviewed and updated to ensure that reimbursements are only requested for complete and accurate meal counts at the correct rate of reimbursement, and that only eligible participants are submitted to the State for reimbursement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions See corrective action plan.
Significant Deficiency 2024-001– Child and Adult Care Food Program – 10.558 – Eligibility Criteria or specific requirement Internal controls should be in place to ensure that complete and accurate meal counts for eligible providers and children be submitted to the State for reimbursement. Condition Six providers received an improper amount for their meal reimbursement for the month tested. Context We determined, through testing of provider meal reimbursements, that an inaccurate number of meals was submitted to the State for reimbursement for six providers in our sample. Effect Two providers were incorrectly reimbursed based off incorrectly adjusted or recapped meals. Two providers had children incorrectly marked as Tier II within the system, when those children should have been reimbursed at Tier I levels. Another provider was over their licensed capacity by one child on certain days throughout the month. For the final provider, the annual enrollment update form could not be located for one child. These items totaled to a net over-reimbursement of the providers of $7. Total estimated errors come to an over-reimbursement of $200. Cause For the providers who were reimbursed based off an incorrect meal count, the first error occurred as a result of mis-keying the provider’s handwritten meal counts into the software. The other error occurred as a result of an error made when making manual adjustments within the software, due to exceptions for capacity. For the providers who had children incorrectly marked as Tier II, the first provider did not have the child correctly marked as Tier I within the software system. The second provider had two children who were entered as Tier I, but the system was not properly recognizing that status. The two final instances noted for being over license capacity and a missing enrollment form were caused by human error. Recommendation Controls should be reviewed and updated to ensure that reimbursements are only requested for complete and accurate meal counts at the correct rate of reimbursement, and that only eligible participants are submitted to the State for reimbursement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions See corrective action plan.