Audit 340444

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.04M
Findings
6
Programs
14
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-01-29
Auditor: Bergankdv LTD

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
520705 2024-004 Material Weakness - N
520706 2024-004 Material Weakness - N
520707 2024-004 Material Weakness - N
1097147 2024-004 Material Weakness - N
1097148 2024-004 Material Weakness - N
1097149 2024-004 Material Weakness - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
UTCFLLX6PK28 Lara Dahl Auditee
3202548211 Janel Bitzan Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of the District under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes of net assets, or cash flows of the District.
Title: PASS-THROUGH GRANT NUMBERS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. All pass-through entities listed above use the same Assistance Listing numbers as the federal grantors to identify these grants and have not assigned any additional identifying numbers.
Title: INVENTORY Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Inventories of commodities donated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture are recorded at market value in the Food Service Fund as inventory. Revenue and expenditures are recorded when commodities are used.

Finding Details

Criteria: Internal controls that assure all construction contracts entered into with federal awards have prevailing wage requirements. Questioned Costs: None Condition: We selected a construction contract to test for prevailing wage requirements noting that this project had not met these requirements as prevailing wage verbiage was not included in the contract. Context: Construction contracts not following prevailing wage requirements could have been accepted. Effect or Potential Effect: Prevailing wage requirements could have not been met and would impact the amount of federal funding the District receives or the use of it on projects. Cause: The District did not oversee that prevailing wage requirements were included in contracts. Recommendation: Ensure the prevailing wage requirement are included in all construction contracts paid for with federal funds.
Criteria: Internal controls that assure all construction contracts entered into with federal awards have prevailing wage requirements. Questioned Costs: None Condition: We selected a construction contract to test for prevailing wage requirements noting that this project had not met these requirements as prevailing wage verbiage was not included in the contract. Context: Construction contracts not following prevailing wage requirements could have been accepted. Effect or Potential Effect: Prevailing wage requirements could have not been met and would impact the amount of federal funding the District receives or the use of it on projects. Cause: The District did not oversee that prevailing wage requirements were included in contracts. Recommendation: Ensure the prevailing wage requirement are included in all construction contracts paid for with federal funds.
Criteria: Internal controls that assure all construction contracts entered into with federal awards have prevailing wage requirements. Questioned Costs: None Condition: We selected a construction contract to test for prevailing wage requirements noting that this project had not met these requirements as prevailing wage verbiage was not included in the contract. Context: Construction contracts not following prevailing wage requirements could have been accepted. Effect or Potential Effect: Prevailing wage requirements could have not been met and would impact the amount of federal funding the District receives or the use of it on projects. Cause: The District did not oversee that prevailing wage requirements were included in contracts. Recommendation: Ensure the prevailing wage requirement are included in all construction contracts paid for with federal funds.
Criteria: Internal controls that assure all construction contracts entered into with federal awards have prevailing wage requirements. Questioned Costs: None Condition: We selected a construction contract to test for prevailing wage requirements noting that this project had not met these requirements as prevailing wage verbiage was not included in the contract. Context: Construction contracts not following prevailing wage requirements could have been accepted. Effect or Potential Effect: Prevailing wage requirements could have not been met and would impact the amount of federal funding the District receives or the use of it on projects. Cause: The District did not oversee that prevailing wage requirements were included in contracts. Recommendation: Ensure the prevailing wage requirement are included in all construction contracts paid for with federal funds.
Criteria: Internal controls that assure all construction contracts entered into with federal awards have prevailing wage requirements. Questioned Costs: None Condition: We selected a construction contract to test for prevailing wage requirements noting that this project had not met these requirements as prevailing wage verbiage was not included in the contract. Context: Construction contracts not following prevailing wage requirements could have been accepted. Effect or Potential Effect: Prevailing wage requirements could have not been met and would impact the amount of federal funding the District receives or the use of it on projects. Cause: The District did not oversee that prevailing wage requirements were included in contracts. Recommendation: Ensure the prevailing wage requirement are included in all construction contracts paid for with federal funds.
Criteria: Internal controls that assure all construction contracts entered into with federal awards have prevailing wage requirements. Questioned Costs: None Condition: We selected a construction contract to test for prevailing wage requirements noting that this project had not met these requirements as prevailing wage verbiage was not included in the contract. Context: Construction contracts not following prevailing wage requirements could have been accepted. Effect or Potential Effect: Prevailing wage requirements could have not been met and would impact the amount of federal funding the District receives or the use of it on projects. Cause: The District did not oversee that prevailing wage requirements were included in contracts. Recommendation: Ensure the prevailing wage requirement are included in all construction contracts paid for with federal funds.