Audit 340318

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.95M
Findings
14
Programs
10
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-01-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
520636 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
520637 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
520638 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
520639 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
520640 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
520641 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
520642 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
1097078 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
1097079 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
1097080 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
1097081 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
1097082 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
1097083 2024-002 Material Weakness - I
1097084 2024-002 Material Weakness - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
NTJQFA7KSNP3 Crystal Roth Auditee
5738834500 Jeffrey C. Stroder, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Ste. Genevieve County R-II School District, Missouri only received reimbursements for direct costs incurred. Therefore, the Schedule does not report any expenditures reimbursed using any indirect cost rate. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of Ste. Genevieve County R-II School District under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part, 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Ste. Genevieve County R-II School District, Missouri, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Ste. Genevieve County R-II School District, Missouri.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Ste. Genevieve County R-II School District, Missouri only received reimbursements for direct costs incurred. Therefore, the Schedule does not report any expenditures reimbursed using any indirect cost rate. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
Title: Federal Assurances Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Ste. Genevieve County R-II School District, Missouri only received reimbursements for direct costs incurred. Therefore, the Schedule does not report any expenditures reimbursed using any indirect cost rate. Ste. Genevieve County R-II School District, Missouri did not have federal insurance in effect during the year or have federal loan or loan guarantees outstanding at year end which are required to be reported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Ste. Genevieve County R-II School District, Missouri only received reimbursements for direct costs incurred. Therefore, the Schedule does not report any expenditures reimbursed using any indirect cost rate. Ste. Genevieve County R-II School District, Missouri only received reimbursements for direct costs incurred. Therefore, the Schedule does not report any expenditures reimbursed using any indirect cost rate.

Finding Details

Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.
Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The District purchased goods from three vendors totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor's status with the federal government. The vendors were, in fact, not excluded parties, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor's status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $816,771 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor's status by checking teh System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor's status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors' status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.