Audit 340032

FY End
2024-09-30
Total Expended
$946,388
Findings
2
Programs
2
Organization: Rose Court (MN)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-01-27

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
520319 2024-001 - - B
1096761 2024-001 - - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.157 Supportive Housing for the Elderly $897,600 Yes 1
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $48,788 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
G3E3XJPRHCN4 Craig Ritter Auditee
3203020192 Brian Baker Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Rose Court has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Rose Court has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of Rose Court, HUD Project No. 092-EE009, and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Rose Court, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Rose Court.
Title: NOTE B – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Rose Court has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Rose Court has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Rose Court has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: NOTE C - U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOAN PROGRAM Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Rose Court has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Rose Court has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. There are no HUD loans in this Project.

Finding Details

FINDING 2024-001: SECTION 202, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.157 Condition: The Project's replacement reserve cash balance was underfunded at September 30, 2024. Criteria: The management company failed to make the correct monthly deposits into the account. Effect: The replacement reserve cash balance was $85 less than it should be at September 30, 2024. Context: Activity in the replacement reserve account for the year ended September 30, 2024 was tested. No sample was tested. Questioned Costs - $85, Cause: The management company failed to increase the monthly deposit amount during the correct month. Recommendation: The Project should deposit $85 into the replacement reserve account. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. Management will deposit $85 into the replacement reserve account as soon as possible. Questioned Costs - Department of Housing and Urban Development - $85, Non-compliance code - N
FINDING 2024-001: SECTION 202, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.157 Condition: The Project's replacement reserve cash balance was underfunded at September 30, 2024. Criteria: The management company failed to make the correct monthly deposits into the account. Effect: The replacement reserve cash balance was $85 less than it should be at September 30, 2024. Context: Activity in the replacement reserve account for the year ended September 30, 2024 was tested. No sample was tested. Questioned Costs - $85, Cause: The management company failed to increase the monthly deposit amount during the correct month. Recommendation: The Project should deposit $85 into the replacement reserve account. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. Management will deposit $85 into the replacement reserve account as soon as possible. Questioned Costs - Department of Housing and Urban Development - $85, Non-compliance code - N