Audit 338615

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.18M
Findings
10
Programs
10
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-01-17

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
519544 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes P
519545 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes P
519546 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes P
519547 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - I
519548 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - I
1095986 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1095987 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1095988 2024-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1095989 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - I
1095990 2024-004 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.555 National School Lunch Program $300,016 Yes 2
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $172,693 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $157,882 Yes 2
84.282 Charter Schools $139,643 - 0
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $127,650 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $81,428 Yes 1
84.358 Rural Education $34,287 - 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants) $28,745 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $11,791 - 0
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $1,855 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
GQ37EPRF6G48 Darin Simpson Auditee
8126487109 Amanda Meko, Cpa, Cgma Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The School has elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance except for federal awards granted by the US Department of Education. The US Department of Education requires a de minimis indirect cost rate of 8-percent. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the School under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the School, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the School.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-001, Material Weakness, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555 and 10.553, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U Criteria: According to 2CFR 200.510(b), the auditee must prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the financial statements that includes all amounts spent on federal programs subject to single audit during the reporting period. Condition: The client prepared Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) understated Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and understated Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, the client prepared SEFA overstated federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Cause: The School reported 2024 program revenue rather than expenditures for the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553. The School's review procedures did not catch a federal award that was excluded from the SEFA, nor a federal award that was included in the SEFA that should not have been. Effect: Audit adjustments were made to increase the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and increase the Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, and audit adjustment was made to reduce federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the School prepare the SEFA utilizing federal award expenditures, rather than revenue. In addition, we recommend that the School's SEFA review procedures include a comparison to the prior year audited SEFA for awards that may have been excluded. Lastly, we recommend that the School research each new federal award on SAM.GOV to determine whether single audit requirements apply. View of responsible officials: See attached corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001, Material Weakness, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555 and 10.553, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U Criteria: According to 2CFR 200.510(b), the auditee must prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the financial statements that includes all amounts spent on federal programs subject to single audit during the reporting period. Condition: The client prepared Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) understated Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and understated Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, the client prepared SEFA overstated federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Cause: The School reported 2024 program revenue rather than expenditures for the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553. The School's review procedures did not catch a federal award that was excluded from the SEFA, nor a federal award that was included in the SEFA that should not have been. Effect: Audit adjustments were made to increase the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and increase the Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, and audit adjustment was made to reduce federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the School prepare the SEFA utilizing federal award expenditures, rather than revenue. In addition, we recommend that the School's SEFA review procedures include a comparison to the prior year audited SEFA for awards that may have been excluded. Lastly, we recommend that the School research each new federal award on SAM.GOV to determine whether single audit requirements apply. View of responsible officials: See attached corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001, Material Weakness, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555 and 10.553, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U Criteria: According to 2CFR 200.510(b), the auditee must prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the financial statements that includes all amounts spent on federal programs subject to single audit during the reporting period. Condition: The client prepared Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) understated Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and understated Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, the client prepared SEFA overstated federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Cause: The School reported 2024 program revenue rather than expenditures for the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553. The School's review procedures did not catch a federal award that was excluded from the SEFA, nor a federal award that was included in the SEFA that should not have been. Effect: Audit adjustments were made to increase the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and increase the Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, and audit adjustment was made to reduce federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the School prepare the SEFA utilizing federal award expenditures, rather than revenue. In addition, we recommend that the School's SEFA review procedures include a comparison to the prior year audited SEFA for awards that may have been excluded. Lastly, we recommend that the School research each new federal award on SAM.GOV to determine whether single audit requirements apply. View of responsible officials: See attached corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-004, Significant deficiency Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE passed through the Indiana Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster 10.553 & 10.555 Criteria : According to 2CFR 200.318(i) the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition : The School did not maintain records for a food vendor that met the simplified acquisition threshold for the year. Cause : The Schools procurement policies do not address the frequency of which vendors should be evaluated. In addition, the policies also do not address records retention. Potential effect: The procurement may not have been proper under the grant requirements. Questioned costs: None. Context: A total sample of four (4) of ten (10) purchases related to a certain food provider were selected as a part of procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement testing for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Recommendation : We recommend that the School follow federal procurement guidelines for each of the different purchase thresholds for each vendor. We further recommend that the School retain any documentation created related to the procurement selection and vetting process. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-004, Significant deficiency Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE passed through the Indiana Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster 10.553 & 10.555 Criteria : According to 2CFR 200.318(i) the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition : The School did not maintain records for a food vendor that met the simplified acquisition threshold for the year. Cause : The Schools procurement policies do not address the frequency of which vendors should be evaluated. In addition, the policies also do not address records retention. Potential effect: The procurement may not have been proper under the grant requirements. Questioned costs: None. Context: A total sample of four (4) of ten (10) purchases related to a certain food provider were selected as a part of procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement testing for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Recommendation : We recommend that the School follow federal procurement guidelines for each of the different purchase thresholds for each vendor. We further recommend that the School retain any documentation created related to the procurement selection and vetting process. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-001, Material Weakness, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555 and 10.553, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U Criteria: According to 2CFR 200.510(b), the auditee must prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the financial statements that includes all amounts spent on federal programs subject to single audit during the reporting period. Condition: The client prepared Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) understated Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and understated Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, the client prepared SEFA overstated federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Cause: The School reported 2024 program revenue rather than expenditures for the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553. The School's review procedures did not catch a federal award that was excluded from the SEFA, nor a federal award that was included in the SEFA that should not have been. Effect: Audit adjustments were made to increase the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and increase the Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, and audit adjustment was made to reduce federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the School prepare the SEFA utilizing federal award expenditures, rather than revenue. In addition, we recommend that the School's SEFA review procedures include a comparison to the prior year audited SEFA for awards that may have been excluded. Lastly, we recommend that the School research each new federal award on SAM.GOV to determine whether single audit requirements apply. View of responsible officials: See attached corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001, Material Weakness, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555 and 10.553, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U Criteria: According to 2CFR 200.510(b), the auditee must prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the financial statements that includes all amounts spent on federal programs subject to single audit during the reporting period. Condition: The client prepared Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) understated Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and understated Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, the client prepared SEFA overstated federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Cause: The School reported 2024 program revenue rather than expenditures for the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553. The School's review procedures did not catch a federal award that was excluded from the SEFA, nor a federal award that was included in the SEFA that should not have been. Effect: Audit adjustments were made to increase the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and increase the Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, and audit adjustment was made to reduce federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the School prepare the SEFA utilizing federal award expenditures, rather than revenue. In addition, we recommend that the School's SEFA review procedures include a comparison to the prior year audited SEFA for awards that may have been excluded. Lastly, we recommend that the School research each new federal award on SAM.GOV to determine whether single audit requirements apply. View of responsible officials: See attached corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-001, Material Weakness, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555 and 10.553, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U Criteria: According to 2CFR 200.510(b), the auditee must prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the financial statements that includes all amounts spent on federal programs subject to single audit during the reporting period. Condition: The client prepared Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) understated Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and understated Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, the client prepared SEFA overstated federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Cause: The School reported 2024 program revenue rather than expenditures for the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553. The School's review procedures did not catch a federal award that was excluded from the SEFA, nor a federal award that was included in the SEFA that should not have been. Effect: Audit adjustments were made to increase the Child Nutrition Cluster 10.555/10.553 expenses by $19,651 and increase the Education Stabilization Fund 84.425U expenditures by $81,428. Lastly, and audit adjustment was made to reduce federal expenditures by $69,851 for a federal award that is not subject to single audit requirements. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: Repeat of finding 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend the School prepare the SEFA utilizing federal award expenditures, rather than revenue. In addition, we recommend that the School's SEFA review procedures include a comparison to the prior year audited SEFA for awards that may have been excluded. Lastly, we recommend that the School research each new federal award on SAM.GOV to determine whether single audit requirements apply. View of responsible officials: See attached corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-004, Significant deficiency Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE passed through the Indiana Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster 10.553 & 10.555 Criteria : According to 2CFR 200.318(i) the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition : The School did not maintain records for a food vendor that met the simplified acquisition threshold for the year. Cause : The Schools procurement policies do not address the frequency of which vendors should be evaluated. In addition, the policies also do not address records retention. Potential effect: The procurement may not have been proper under the grant requirements. Questioned costs: None. Context: A total sample of four (4) of ten (10) purchases related to a certain food provider were selected as a part of procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement testing for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Recommendation : We recommend that the School follow federal procurement guidelines for each of the different purchase thresholds for each vendor. We further recommend that the School retain any documentation created related to the procurement selection and vetting process. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-004, Significant deficiency Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE passed through the Indiana Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster 10.553 & 10.555 Criteria : According to 2CFR 200.318(i) the recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition : The School did not maintain records for a food vendor that met the simplified acquisition threshold for the year. Cause : The Schools procurement policies do not address the frequency of which vendors should be evaluated. In addition, the policies also do not address records retention. Potential effect: The procurement may not have been proper under the grant requirements. Questioned costs: None. Context: A total sample of four (4) of ten (10) purchases related to a certain food provider were selected as a part of procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement testing for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Recommendation : We recommend that the School follow federal procurement guidelines for each of the different purchase thresholds for each vendor. We further recommend that the School retain any documentation created related to the procurement selection and vetting process. Views of Responsible Officials: See attached Corrective Action Plan.