Audit 338475

FY End
2024-03-31
Total Expended
$9.29M
Findings
4
Programs
5
Organization: Baldwin Family Health Care (MI)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-01-16

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
519505 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
519506 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1095947 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1095948 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
D1ZJZTKQ1NK4 Mason Husby Auditee
2317455012 Robert Friske Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: USDA LOAN AGREEMENT Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Baldwin Family Health Center and is presented using the cash basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. The expenditures in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards are in agreement with the amounts reported in the financial statements and reports submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services. Although some grant awards are for different periods than the Center's fiscal year, all expenditures in the schedule are for the year ended March 31, 2024. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Baldwin Family Health Care has not elected to use the 10% de minimus indirect costs rate. The amount expended under AL 10.766, Community Facilities Loans and Grants, represents the beginning loan balances of two U.S. Department of Agriculture loan agreements. The loans had outstanding prinicipal balances totaling $3,800,269 as of March 31, 2024.
Title: RECONCILIATION OF FEDERAL AWARDS Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Baldwin Family Health Center and is presented using the cash basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. The expenditures in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards are in agreement with the amounts reported in the financial statements and reports submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services. Although some grant awards are for different periods than the Center's fiscal year, all expenditures in the schedule are for the year ended March 31, 2024. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Baldwin Family Health Care has not elected to use the 10% de minimus indirect costs rate. Federal awards revenue for the year ended March 31, 2024 is reported as follows: Expenditures per schedule of expenditures of federal awards $9,285,494. Health Center Cluster (AL#93.224 and 93.527) - Revenue in prior year on the statement of activities, reported on the current year schedule of expenditures of federal awards $(182,169). Community Facilities Loans and Grants (AL# 10.766) Represents the beginning loan balance of loan agreement with U.S. Department of Agriculture $(3,974,379). Federal grants per statement of activities $5,128,946.

Finding Details

Criteria - Health centers are required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of patients' ability to pay and their eligibility. A patient's eligibility to pay is determined on the basis of the official poverty guideline, as revised by DHHS (42 CFR Sections 51c, 107(b)(5) and 56.303(f)). The Center should be implementing and monitoring procedures to properly determine, calculate, and review sliding fee discounts issued to patients in accordance with the Center's sliding fee scale. Condition - During audit procedures of sliding fee adjustments there were multiple instances where the slide was inappropriately applied based on the sliding fee discount schedule in place at the time of service and multiple applications were missing. Questioned Costs - None. Context- A nonstatistical sample of 25 sliding fee adjustment transactions were selected for testing. Of this sample three errors were identified as incorrect sliding fee was given to the patient and three sliding fee applications were missing patient signatures. Potential Effect - The Center did not comply with the determination of sliding fee discounts based on the federal poverty guidelines in effect for the year ended March 31, 2024. In addition, the Center did not comply with its policies and procedures and may have not properly calculated the sliding fee or discount given to the patients and the discount given, in any, may not have been based on the patient's ability to pay. Cause - The cause on the incorrect slides applied appears to be mainly due to errors in manual calculations for patients with vision visits. Missing signatures is attributable to human error and the lack of internal controls to monitor and review to ensure that the proper sliding fee documentation is being collected and applied. Recommendation - Along with providing proper training to employees , we recommend that the Center develop a tool the eliminates manual calculations for the front desk staff to use in determining which fees to apply to vision patients. In addition to implementing policies and procedures to ensure the sliding fee discounts are being properly monitored and supervised on a periodic basis to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Management concurs with this finding and will ensure that controls are established to ensure proper training and monitoring of the sliding fee discounts.
Criteria - Health centers are required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of patients' ability to pay and their eligibility. A patient's eligibility to pay is determined on the basis of the official poverty guideline, as revised by DHHS (42 CFR Sections 51c, 107(b)(5) and 56.303(f)). The Center should be implementing and monitoring procedures to properly determine, calculate, and review sliding fee discounts issued to patients in accordance with the Center's sliding fee scale. Condition - During audit procedures of sliding fee adjustments there were multiple instances where the slide was inappropriately applied based on the sliding fee discount schedule in place at the time of service and multiple applications were missing. Questioned Costs - None. Context- A nonstatistical sample of 25 sliding fee adjustment transactions were selected for testing. Of this sample three errors were identified as incorrect sliding fee was given to the patient and three sliding fee applications were missing patient signatures. Potential Effect - The Center did not comply with the determination of sliding fee discounts based on the federal poverty guidelines in effect for the year ended March 31, 2024. In addition, the Center did not comply with its policies and procedures and may have not properly calculated the sliding fee or discount given to the patients and the discount given, in any, may not have been based on the patient's ability to pay. Cause - The cause on the incorrect slides applied appears to be mainly due to errors in manual calculations for patients with vision visits. Missing signatures is attributable to human error and the lack of internal controls to monitor and review to ensure that the proper sliding fee documentation is being collected and applied. Recommendation - Along with providing proper training to employees , we recommend that the Center develop a tool the eliminates manual calculations for the front desk staff to use in determining which fees to apply to vision patients. In addition to implementing policies and procedures to ensure the sliding fee discounts are being properly monitored and supervised on a periodic basis to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Management concurs with this finding and will ensure that controls are established to ensure proper training and monitoring of the sliding fee discounts.
Criteria - Health centers are required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of patients' ability to pay and their eligibility. A patient's eligibility to pay is determined on the basis of the official poverty guideline, as revised by DHHS (42 CFR Sections 51c, 107(b)(5) and 56.303(f)). The Center should be implementing and monitoring procedures to properly determine, calculate, and review sliding fee discounts issued to patients in accordance with the Center's sliding fee scale. Condition - During audit procedures of sliding fee adjustments there were multiple instances where the slide was inappropriately applied based on the sliding fee discount schedule in place at the time of service and multiple applications were missing. Questioned Costs - None. Context- A nonstatistical sample of 25 sliding fee adjustment transactions were selected for testing. Of this sample three errors were identified as incorrect sliding fee was given to the patient and three sliding fee applications were missing patient signatures. Potential Effect - The Center did not comply with the determination of sliding fee discounts based on the federal poverty guidelines in effect for the year ended March 31, 2024. In addition, the Center did not comply with its policies and procedures and may have not properly calculated the sliding fee or discount given to the patients and the discount given, in any, may not have been based on the patient's ability to pay. Cause - The cause on the incorrect slides applied appears to be mainly due to errors in manual calculations for patients with vision visits. Missing signatures is attributable to human error and the lack of internal controls to monitor and review to ensure that the proper sliding fee documentation is being collected and applied. Recommendation - Along with providing proper training to employees , we recommend that the Center develop a tool the eliminates manual calculations for the front desk staff to use in determining which fees to apply to vision patients. In addition to implementing policies and procedures to ensure the sliding fee discounts are being properly monitored and supervised on a periodic basis to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Management concurs with this finding and will ensure that controls are established to ensure proper training and monitoring of the sliding fee discounts.
Criteria - Health centers are required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted on the basis of patients' ability to pay and their eligibility. A patient's eligibility to pay is determined on the basis of the official poverty guideline, as revised by DHHS (42 CFR Sections 51c, 107(b)(5) and 56.303(f)). The Center should be implementing and monitoring procedures to properly determine, calculate, and review sliding fee discounts issued to patients in accordance with the Center's sliding fee scale. Condition - During audit procedures of sliding fee adjustments there were multiple instances where the slide was inappropriately applied based on the sliding fee discount schedule in place at the time of service and multiple applications were missing. Questioned Costs - None. Context- A nonstatistical sample of 25 sliding fee adjustment transactions were selected for testing. Of this sample three errors were identified as incorrect sliding fee was given to the patient and three sliding fee applications were missing patient signatures. Potential Effect - The Center did not comply with the determination of sliding fee discounts based on the federal poverty guidelines in effect for the year ended March 31, 2024. In addition, the Center did not comply with its policies and procedures and may have not properly calculated the sliding fee or discount given to the patients and the discount given, in any, may not have been based on the patient's ability to pay. Cause - The cause on the incorrect slides applied appears to be mainly due to errors in manual calculations for patients with vision visits. Missing signatures is attributable to human error and the lack of internal controls to monitor and review to ensure that the proper sliding fee documentation is being collected and applied. Recommendation - Along with providing proper training to employees , we recommend that the Center develop a tool the eliminates manual calculations for the front desk staff to use in determining which fees to apply to vision patients. In addition to implementing policies and procedures to ensure the sliding fee discounts are being properly monitored and supervised on a periodic basis to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Management concurs with this finding and will ensure that controls are established to ensure proper training and monitoring of the sliding fee discounts.