Audit 337377

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$20.72M
Findings
2
Programs
40
Organization: Pender County, North Carolina (NC)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-01-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
518901 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - E
1095343 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
66.468 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund $2.82M Yes 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $1.99M Yes 1
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $600,741 - 0
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $358,271 - 0
93.563 Child Support Services $307,989 Yes 0
93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $300,000 - 0
10.557 Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children $297,693 - 0
93.658 Foster Care Title IV-E $188,828 - 0
93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (elc) $140,409 - 0
93.767 Children's Health Insurance Program $126,447 - 0
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $120,593 Yes 0
93.596 Child Care Mandatory and Matching Funds of the Child Care and Development Fund $119,893 - 0
93.045 Special Programs for the Aging, Title Iii, Part C, Nutrition Services $118,584 - 0
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $105,719 - 0
93.044 Special Programs for the Aging, Title Iii, Part B, Grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers $92,108 - 0
93.667 Social Services Block Grant $86,013 - 0
93.053 Nutrition Services Incentive Program $83,371 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $62,484 - 0
21.032 Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund $50,000 - 0
93.217 Family Planning Services $43,396 - 0
93.994 Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States $40,466 - 0
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $39,698 - 0
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $31,364 - 0
93.991 Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant $30,431 - 0
10.927 Emergency Watershed Protection Program - Disaster Relief Appropriations Act $26,688 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $26,411 - 0
93.052 National Family Caregiver Support, Title Iii, Part E $23,769 - 0
93.116 Project Grants and Cooperative Agreements for Tuberculosis Control Programs $20,843 - 0
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $18,653 - 0
93.674 John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood $15,706 - 0
93.043 Special Programs for the Aging, Title Iii, Part D, Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Services $9,336 - 0
93.659 Adoption Assistance $9,105 - 0
93.898 Cancer Prevention and Control Programs for State, Territorial and Tribal Organizations $6,270 - 0
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $5,718 - 0
93.556 Marylee Allen Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program $5,105 - 0
93.110 Maternal and Child Health Federal Consolidated Programs $3,906 - 0
93.566 Refugee and Entrant Assistance State/replacement Designee Administered Programs $2,062 - 0
93.917 Hiv Care Formula Grants $1,706 - 0
93.568 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance $387 - 0
93.977 Sexually Transmitted Diseases (std) Prevention and Control Grants $100 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
DKDZCDLWEMP3 Margaret Blue Auditee
9102591407 Erica Brown Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Pender County's indirect costs are determined by a state-approved plan contracted annually with DMG Maximus, Inc. and therefore has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards (SEFSA) includes the federal and state grant activity of Pender County under the programs of the federal government and the state of North Carolina for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this SEFSA is presented in accordance with the implementation of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulation Part 200, Uniform Adminstative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards and the State Single Audit Implementation Act. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Pender County, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of Pender County.
Title: Cluster of Programs Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Pender County's indirect costs are determined by a state-approved plan contracted annually with DMG Maximus, Inc. and therefore has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under The following are clustered by the NC Department of Health and Human Services and are treated separately for state audit requirement purposes: Foster Care, Adoption, and Guardianship Assistance Program Cluster, Subsidized Child Care Program Cluster, Refugee and Entrant Assistance Cluster, and Special Children Adoption Fund Cluster
Title: Opioid Settlement Fund Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Pender County's indirect costs are determined by a state-approved plan contracted annually with DMG Maximus, Inc. and therefore has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under The NC Department of Justice does not consider Opioid Settlement Funds either federal or state financial assistance since they are from a settlement with private major drug companies. Since these funds are subject to the State Single Audit Implementation Act, they are reported as "Other Financial Assistance" on the SEFSA, and considered state awards for state single audit requirements.
Title: Loans Outstanding Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Pender County's indirect costs are determined by a state-approved plan contracted annually with DMG Maximus, Inc. and therefore has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Pender County had the following loan balance outstanding at June 30, 2024, for loans that the grantor/pass-through grantor has still imposed continuing compliance requirements. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year and loans made during the year are included in the SEFSA. No drawdowns have been made at June 30, 2024, for the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. The balance of loans outstanding at June 30, 2024 consist of:

Finding Details

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medicaid Cluster AL # 93.778 Grant Number: 071-420 Finding: 2024-003 Significant Deficiency, Eligibility Nonmaterial Non-compliance Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that casefiles include all required documentation. In accordance with 45 CFR 435, documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. Condition: The County Department of Social Services maintained inconsistent documentation for income and household membership. Context: Of the 484,970 benefit payments valued at $183,928,254, we examined 60 ($24,334 value) and determined that one casefile (2%) had inconsistent documentation supporting the eligibility determination in the case file. Upon further review, the recipient was deemed eligible. Effect: Casefile maintained inconsistent documentation, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: The caseworker did not verify updated documentation to the NCFAST system. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. The County was able to substantiate that the recipients were eligible to receive benefits. Recommendation: Caseworkers should review their eligibility determinations and ensure that the correct information is included for proper documentation for eligibility. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medicaid Cluster AL # 93.778 Grant Number: 071-420 Finding: 2024-003 Significant Deficiency, Eligibility Nonmaterial Non-compliance Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that casefiles include all required documentation. In accordance with 45 CFR 435, documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. Condition: The County Department of Social Services maintained inconsistent documentation for income and household membership. Context: Of the 484,970 benefit payments valued at $183,928,254, we examined 60 ($24,334 value) and determined that one casefile (2%) had inconsistent documentation supporting the eligibility determination in the case file. Upon further review, the recipient was deemed eligible. Effect: Casefile maintained inconsistent documentation, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: The caseworker did not verify updated documentation to the NCFAST system. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. The County was able to substantiate that the recipients were eligible to receive benefits. Recommendation: Caseworkers should review their eligibility determinations and ensure that the correct information is included for proper documentation for eligibility. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report