Audit 336057

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$12.96M
Findings
2
Programs
15
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2025-01-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
KG1HAHN1BKN5 Michael Cornale Auditee
3098276031 Richard W Phillips Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 – Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Bloomington Public Schools District No. 87 and is presented on the cash basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Bloomington Public Schools District No. 87 and is presented on the cash basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements.
Title: Note 2 – Indirect Costs Rate Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Bloomington Public Schools District No. 87 and is presented on the cash basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The District has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.
Title: Note 3 – Non-Cash Assistance Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Bloomington Public Schools District No. 87 and is presented on the cash basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Non-cash assistance is included in the schedule of federal awards at the fair market value of the non-monetary assistance received and disbursed. The District received $115,380 and $107,940 in non-cash commodities and Department of Defense fruits and vegetables, respectively during the fiscal year.
Title: Note 4 – Subrecipients Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Bloomington Public Schools District No. 87 and is presented on the cash basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. No federal funds of the District were provided to subrecipients during the year.
Title: Note 5 – Other Information Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Bloomington Public Schools District No. 87 and is presented on the cash basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. No federal funds were used to purchase insurance during the fiscal year.

Finding Details

Criteria - 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D, paragraph 200.302 (b)(3) - Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition - Expenditures were claimed as federal expenditures for the purchase of supplies even though the purchase agreement had not been fulfilled and supported by appropriate source documentation. Questioned Costs - Expenditiures in the amount of $258,750 for incomplete purchase transactions were reported to the grantor. Context - Supplies for the federal program were budgeted, ordered and approved, but due to delays in delivery by the vendor, the orders were not completed by the end of the fiscal year. Checks were prepared in anticipation of completion of the orders and expenditures were recorded and reported to the grantor even though the prepared checks were held by management. Effect - Program expenditures were overstated by $258,750. Cause -The procedures for approval and preparation of payment for supplies were completed even though the supply purchase agreement had not been fulfilled. Recommendation - The District should amend and submit corrected reports to the Grantor. Any expenditure reimbursements received should be refunded to the Grantor. Procedures for payment of supplies should not be completed until the purchase agreement terms have been fulfilled by the vendor. Management's response - All funds have been refunded to state agency and expense reports amended appropriately.
Criteria - 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D, paragraph 200.302 (b)(3) - Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition - Expenditures were claimed as federal expenditures for the purchase of supplies even though the purchase agreement had not been fulfilled and supported by appropriate source documentation. Questioned Costs - Expenditiures in the amount of $258,750 for incomplete purchase transactions were reported to the grantor. Context - Supplies for the federal program were budgeted, ordered and approved, but due to delays in delivery by the vendor, the orders were not completed by the end of the fiscal year. Checks were prepared in anticipation of completion of the orders and expenditures were recorded and reported to the grantor even though the prepared checks were held by management. Effect - Program expenditures were overstated by $258,750. Cause -The procedures for approval and preparation of payment for supplies were completed even though the supply purchase agreement had not been fulfilled. Recommendation - The District should amend and submit corrected reports to the Grantor. Any expenditure reimbursements received should be refunded to the Grantor. Procedures for payment of supplies should not be completed until the purchase agreement terms have been fulfilled by the vendor. Management's response - All funds have been refunded to state agency and expense reports amended appropriately.