FAC Explorer

Audit 33547

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$5.55M
Findings
0
Programs
16
Organization: Feather River Community College District (CA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-12-21
Auditor: Crowe LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.425 Covid-19 - Education Stabilization Fund $1.20M Yes 0
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $727,563 Yes 0
84.044 Trio_talent Search $288,927 - 0
84.042 Trio_student Support Services $287,782 - 0
84.047 Trio_upward Bound $286,124 - 0
10.665 Schools and Roads - Grants to States $145,373 - 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $90,752 - 0
84.031 Higher Education_institutional Aid $55,464 - 0
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $38,400 Yes 0
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $16,615 Yes 0
93.667 Social Services Block Grant $15,994 - 0
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $9,203 Yes 0
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant $6,620 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $5,678 - 0
93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services_projects of Regional and National Significance $1,372 - 0
64.027 Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance $1,141 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
XTKJLJHKKCU4 Morgan Turner Auditee
5302830202 Jennifer Richards Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal award activity of Feather River Community College District, and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The District has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.