Audit 335349

FY End
2021-12-31
Total Expended
$3.84M
Findings
8
Programs
23
Organization: Laporte County (IN)
Year: 2021 Accepted: 2024-12-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
517348 2021-005 Material Weakness - I
517349 2021-006 Material Weakness - I
517350 2021-006 Material Weakness - I
517351 2021-007 Material Weakness - L
1093790 2021-005 Material Weakness - I
1093791 2021-006 Material Weakness - I
1093792 2021-006 Material Weakness - I
1093793 2021-007 Material Weakness - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.36M Yes 2
93.563 Child Support Services $819,923 - 0
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $423,379 Yes 1
16.838 Comprehensive Opioid, Stimulant, and Other Substances Use Program $168,423 - 0
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $151,202 - 0
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $139,646 - 0
93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (elc) $124,261 - 0
93.498 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (arp) Rural Distribution $106,264 - 0
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $105,608 - 0
21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund $100,000 - 0
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $95,492 - 0
93.788 Opioid Str $60,000 - 0
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $27,362 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $25,138 - 0
93.994 Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States $20,000 - 0
20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders for Driving While Intoxicated $17,791 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $17,039 - 0
16.540 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention $7,301 - 0
66.472 Beach Monitoring and Notification Program Implementation Grants $5,859 - 0
97.012 Boating Safety Financial Assistance $3,726 - 0
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $2,745 - 0
93.946 Cooperative Agreements to Support State-Based Safe Motherhood and Infant Health Initiative Programs $1,460 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $298 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
P2MLN27WFT62 Timothy Stabosz Auditee
2193266808 Beth Kelley, Cpa, Cfe Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies A. Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federal grant activity of the County under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2021. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a select portion of the operations of the County, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position of the County. B. Other Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, or the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 2. Indirect Cost Rate The County has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

FINDING 2021-005 Subject: Highway Planning and Construction - Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster Assistance Listings Number: 20.205 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): DES #1702829, DES #1801831, DES #1401027, DES #1592335, DES #1592338, DES #1902029, DES #1902197, DES #1902815, DES #1902818 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Transportation Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance to ensure that the Local Public Agency (LPA) Selection Review Checklist was properly supported. The lack of internal controls resulted in noncompliance. For consultant contracting (engineering and design related services) the Local Public Agency (LPA), (La Porte County) will create and send a Request for Proposal (RFP) to the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), who will review and advertise them. Consultants can then respond to those RFPs by completing and submitting a Letter of Interest (LOI). After all LOIs are received and ranked, the County reports the number of LOIs received on the LPA Selection Review Checklist. The County did not keep or maintain the LOIs as reported to the INDOT on the LPA Selection Review Checklist. As a result, the number of LOIs documented on the checklist provided to the INDOT could not be verified or audited. In addition, we were unable to ensure the minimum number of LOIs were received to meet the procurement competition standards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 49 CFR 18.36(9) states: "Grantees and subgrantees will maintain records sufficient to detail the significant history of a procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Cause Management did not develop a system of internal controls to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of a procurement as required by retaining the LOIs. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system places the County at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements and resulted in a Qualified Opinion. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the County's management design and implement a proper system of internal controls to ensure the County retains the LOIs to ensure compliance with procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2021-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): Regular FY 2021, Revenue Loss FY 2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the County in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), SLFRF funds, recipients are required to verify that contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (ELPS), collection of a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. Upon inquiring of the County to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), SLFRF funds, the County stated procedures were not in place to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. The County had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities during the audit period on 100 percent of the applicable two vendors that were paid with SLFRF funds, which totaled $657,583. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the County did not develop a system of internal controls to ensure that policies and procedures were in place and followed, related to suspension and debarment. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures to ensure its compliance with requirements related to suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2021-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): Regular FY 2021, Revenue Loss FY 2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the County in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), SLFRF funds, recipients are required to verify that contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (ELPS), collection of a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. Upon inquiring of the County to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), SLFRF funds, the County stated procedures were not in place to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. The County had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities during the audit period on 100 percent of the applicable two vendors that were paid with SLFRF funds, which totaled $657,583. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the County did not develop a system of internal controls to ensure that policies and procedures were in place and followed, related to suspension and debarment. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures to ensure its compliance with requirements related to suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2021-007 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): Revenue Loss FY 2021 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the County in order to ensure compliance with requirement related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Recipients were required to submit a one-time Interim report to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The respective due date was August 31, 2021, or 60 days after receiving funding if funding was received by October 15. The report was to show expenditures by category. The County submitted the required interim report during the audit period. The County's process for the completion and submission of the Interim Report was that the County Auditor prepared the Interim Report based on the County's records, without a proper oversight or review process in place prior to submission. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The Interim Report was determined to be materially misstated. The County understated the December 31, 2019 Base Year Revenues by $660,302. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented by management of the County to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to reporting to ensure the amounts reported were accurate. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provision of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the management of the County establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for all reports. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2021-005 Subject: Highway Planning and Construction - Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program: Highway Planning and Construction Cluster Assistance Listings Number: 20.205 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): DES #1702829, DES #1801831, DES #1401027, DES #1592335, DES #1592338, DES #1902029, DES #1902197, DES #1902815, DES #1902818 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Transportation Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance to ensure that the Local Public Agency (LPA) Selection Review Checklist was properly supported. The lack of internal controls resulted in noncompliance. For consultant contracting (engineering and design related services) the Local Public Agency (LPA), (La Porte County) will create and send a Request for Proposal (RFP) to the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), who will review and advertise them. Consultants can then respond to those RFPs by completing and submitting a Letter of Interest (LOI). After all LOIs are received and ranked, the County reports the number of LOIs received on the LPA Selection Review Checklist. The County did not keep or maintain the LOIs as reported to the INDOT on the LPA Selection Review Checklist. As a result, the number of LOIs documented on the checklist provided to the INDOT could not be verified or audited. In addition, we were unable to ensure the minimum number of LOIs were received to meet the procurement competition standards. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 49 CFR 18.36(9) states: "Grantees and subgrantees will maintain records sufficient to detail the significant history of a procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." Cause Management did not develop a system of internal controls to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of a procurement as required by retaining the LOIs. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system places the County at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements and resulted in a Qualified Opinion. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the County's management design and implement a proper system of internal controls to ensure the County retains the LOIs to ensure compliance with procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2021-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): Regular FY 2021, Revenue Loss FY 2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the County in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), SLFRF funds, recipients are required to verify that contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (ELPS), collection of a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. Upon inquiring of the County to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), SLFRF funds, the County stated procedures were not in place to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. The County had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities during the audit period on 100 percent of the applicable two vendors that were paid with SLFRF funds, which totaled $657,583. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the County did not develop a system of internal controls to ensure that policies and procedures were in place and followed, related to suspension and debarment. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures to ensure its compliance with requirements related to suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2021-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): Regular FY 2021, Revenue Loss FY 2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the County in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 28 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), SLFRF funds, recipients are required to verify that contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (ELPS), collection of a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. Upon inquiring of the County to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), SLFRF funds, the County stated procedures were not in place to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. The County had not performed procedures to ensure the vendors were not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participation in federal assistance programs or activities during the audit period on 100 percent of the applicable two vendors that were paid with SLFRF funds, which totaled $657,583. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the County did not develop a system of internal controls to ensure that policies and procedures were in place and followed, related to suspension and debarment. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 29 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Furthermore, noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures to ensure its compliance with requirements related to suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2021-007 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): Revenue Loss FY 2021 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the County in order to ensure compliance with requirement related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirement. Recipients were required to submit a one-time Interim report to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). The respective due date was August 31, 2021, or 60 days after receiving funding if funding was received by October 15. The report was to show expenditures by category. The County submitted the required interim report during the audit period. The County's process for the completion and submission of the Interim Report was that the County Auditor prepared the Interim Report based on the County's records, without a proper oversight or review process in place prior to submission. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 30 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The Interim Report was determined to be materially misstated. The County understated the December 31, 2019 Base Year Revenues by $660,302. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed or implemented by management of the County to ensure that policies and procedures were in place related to reporting to ensure the amounts reported were accurate. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Noncompliance with the provision of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 31 LA PORTE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the management of the County establish a system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures over the preparation and review of federal reports to ensure appropriate reviews, approval, and oversight are taking place. Additionally, management should develop policies and procedures to ensure that the County provides the Treasury with complete and accurate information for all reports. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.