Audit 334174

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$13.54M
Findings
8
Programs
11
Organization: Fox C-6 School District (MO)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-12-20

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
516352 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
516353 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
516354 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
516355 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - B
1092794 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1092795 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1092796 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1092797 2024-002 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZCKAME1MXW73 Christina Rufkahr Auditee
6362968000 Gina Cochran Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of Fox C-6 School District (the District) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District and is reported on the modified cash basis of accounting, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the District.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. There have been no awards passed through to subrecipients.
Title: Food Distribution Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Nonmonetary assistance is reported in the schedule at the fair market value of the commodities received and disbursed by the District during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.

Finding Details

Criteria: All employees that are charged to the Special Education or Title program should be properly supported by a time and effort logs or semi-annual certifications. Condition: Substitute teachers did not have a time and effort log that showed the time charged to the program. Cause: Substitutes teacher benefits and pay are not typically charged to the federal program by the District. Effect: Payroll charges may not be an allowable cost under the federal program when they are not supported by approved time and effort logs. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: We recommend that all employees that are charged to the program should be properly supported by a time and effort log or semi-annual certification.
Criteria: All employees that are charged to the Special Education or Title program should be properly supported by a time and effort logs or semi-annual certifications. Condition: Substitute teachers did not have a time and effort log that showed the time charged to the program. Cause: Substitutes teacher benefits and pay are not typically charged to the federal program by the District. Effect: Payroll charges may not be an allowable cost under the federal program when they are not supported by approved time and effort logs. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: We recommend that all employees that are charged to the program should be properly supported by a time and effort log or semi-annual certification.
Criteria: All employees that are charged to the Special Education or Title program should be properly supported by a time and effort logs or semi-annual certifications. Condition: Substitute teachers did not have a time and effort log that showed the time charged to the program. Cause: Substitutes teacher benefits and pay are not typically charged to the federal program by the District. Effect: Payroll charges may not be an allowable cost under the federal program when they are not supported by approved time and effort logs. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: We recommend that all employees that are charged to the program should be properly supported by a time and effort log or semi-annual certification.
Criteria: All expenditures should be approved by the Board of Directors. Condition: There were expenditures that were not approved by the Board of Directors. Cause: There was a timing difference from when the check listing was generated for the Board approval and certain pay runs were not included on the listing when it was provided to the Board for approval. Effect: Expenditures were paid without Board approval. Questioned Cost: $39,625 Recommendation: We recommend that the expenditure listing report provided to the Board of Directors include all checks included in the specific date range.
Criteria: All employees that are charged to the Special Education or Title program should be properly supported by a time and effort logs or semi-annual certifications. Condition: Substitute teachers did not have a time and effort log that showed the time charged to the program. Cause: Substitutes teacher benefits and pay are not typically charged to the federal program by the District. Effect: Payroll charges may not be an allowable cost under the federal program when they are not supported by approved time and effort logs. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: We recommend that all employees that are charged to the program should be properly supported by a time and effort log or semi-annual certification.
Criteria: All employees that are charged to the Special Education or Title program should be properly supported by a time and effort logs or semi-annual certifications. Condition: Substitute teachers did not have a time and effort log that showed the time charged to the program. Cause: Substitutes teacher benefits and pay are not typically charged to the federal program by the District. Effect: Payroll charges may not be an allowable cost under the federal program when they are not supported by approved time and effort logs. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: We recommend that all employees that are charged to the program should be properly supported by a time and effort log or semi-annual certification.
Criteria: All employees that are charged to the Special Education or Title program should be properly supported by a time and effort logs or semi-annual certifications. Condition: Substitute teachers did not have a time and effort log that showed the time charged to the program. Cause: Substitutes teacher benefits and pay are not typically charged to the federal program by the District. Effect: Payroll charges may not be an allowable cost under the federal program when they are not supported by approved time and effort logs. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: We recommend that all employees that are charged to the program should be properly supported by a time and effort log or semi-annual certification.
Criteria: All expenditures should be approved by the Board of Directors. Condition: There were expenditures that were not approved by the Board of Directors. Cause: There was a timing difference from when the check listing was generated for the Board approval and certain pay runs were not included on the listing when it was provided to the Board for approval. Effect: Expenditures were paid without Board approval. Questioned Cost: $39,625 Recommendation: We recommend that the expenditure listing report provided to the Board of Directors include all checks included in the specific date range.