Audit 333255

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$768,847
Findings
2
Programs
1
Organization: Project Learn of Summit County (OH)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-12-18
Auditor: Sikich CPA LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
515512 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
1091954 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - AB

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.002A Adult Basic and Literacy Education $768,847 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
N4KNN9JZCJ77 Marquita Mitchell Auditee
3304349461 Lisa Denholm Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Accounting Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Project Learn of Summit County (the Agency) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Agency; it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, functional expenses, or cash flows of the Agency. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Agency did not elect to use the de minimis rate of 10% for the year ended June 30, 2024. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Subrecipients Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Project Learn of Summit County (the Agency) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Agency; it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, functional expenses, or cash flows of the Agency. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Agency did not elect to use the de minimis rate of 10% for the year ended June 30, 2024. The Agency did not provide federal awards to subrecipients during the year ended June 30, 2024.
Title: Non-cash assistance, Loans outstanding, and Insurance Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Project Learn of Summit County (the Agency) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Agency; it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, functional expenses, or cash flows of the Agency. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Agency did not elect to use the de minimis rate of 10% for the year ended June 30, 2024. The Agency did not receive any federal non-cash assistance, federal loans or federal insurance for the year ended June 30, 2024.

Finding Details

Condition: During our testing of allowable costs and reporting requirement, we noted exceptions in the ability of management to support payroll incurred for the federal program. The Agency submitted reimbursement for costs that could not be supported as relating to the federal program. Criteria: Under Code of Federal Regulations 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under Federal awards, they must be adequately documented and there must be sufficient documentation. Further under the Uniform Guidance, if a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involve, then the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefited projects on any reasonable documented basis. Cause: Principles and procedures were not appropriately adhered to in certain instances to ensure that supporting documentation was maintained to evidence that costs were allowable and that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging costs to a federal program. Effect: An ineffective control system related to charging of costs to federal programs in order to ensure that only hours work relating the program is charged and requested for reimbursement can lead to noncompliance with law and regulations and possible loss of funding for the related program. Questioned Costs: $383 Context: We sampled 40 items and found 2 exceptions resulting in over reimbursement of $383. This is a condition identified per review of the Agency’s compliance with specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency ensure its policies and procedures are followed on a consistent basis.
Condition: During our testing of allowable costs and reporting requirement, we noted exceptions in the ability of management to support payroll incurred for the federal program. The Agency submitted reimbursement for costs that could not be supported as relating to the federal program. Criteria: Under Code of Federal Regulations 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowed under Federal awards, they must be adequately documented and there must be sufficient documentation. Further under the Uniform Guidance, if a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involve, then the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefited projects on any reasonable documented basis. Cause: Principles and procedures were not appropriately adhered to in certain instances to ensure that supporting documentation was maintained to evidence that costs were allowable and that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging costs to a federal program. Effect: An ineffective control system related to charging of costs to federal programs in order to ensure that only hours work relating the program is charged and requested for reimbursement can lead to noncompliance with law and regulations and possible loss of funding for the related program. Questioned Costs: $383 Context: We sampled 40 items and found 2 exceptions resulting in over reimbursement of $383. This is a condition identified per review of the Agency’s compliance with specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency ensure its policies and procedures are followed on a consistent basis.