Audit 33279

FY End
2022-08-31
Total Expended
$225.55M
Findings
10
Programs
37
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
32843 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
32844 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
32845 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
32846 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
32847 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
609285 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
609286 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
609287 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
609288 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L
609289 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $79.89M Yes 1
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $13.95M Yes 1
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $3.87M Yes 0
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $2.72M Yes 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $2.31M - 0
84.047 Trio_upward Bound $1.58M - 0
84.042 Trio_student Support Services $681,023 - 0
84.002 Adult Education - Basic Grants to States $563,231 - 0
17.285 Apprenticeship USA Grants $559,971 - 0
11.300 Investments for Public Works and Economic Development Facilities $410,786 - 0
84.335 Child Care Access Means Parents in School $389,284 - 0
93.093 Affordable Care Act (aca) Health Profession Opportunity Grants $307,008 - 0
84.044 Trio_talent Search $269,467 - 0
17.268 H-1b Job Training Grants $253,439 - 0
12.902 Information Security Grants $172,514 - 0
84.031 Higher Education_institutional Aid $163,998 - 0
94.006 Americorps $128,518 - 0
12.905 Cybersecurity Core Curriculum $120,032 - 0
47.076 Education and Human Resources $90,496 - 0
16.525 Grants to Reduce Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking on Campus $85,145 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $81,119 Yes 0
84.066 Trio_educational Opportunity Centers $73,594 - 0
12.903 Gencyber Grants Program $66,307 - 0
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $48,971 - 0
93.092 Affordable Care Act (aca) Personal Responsibility Education Program $47,610 - 0
45.162 Promotion of the Humanities_teaching and Learning Resources and Curriculum Development $33,959 - 0
43.008 Office of Stem Engagement (ostem) $30,508 - 0
20.235 Commercial Motor Vehicle Operator Training Grants $25,000 - 0
17.278 Wioa Dislocated Worker Formula Grants $22,459 - 0
93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services_projects of Regional and National Significance $9,694 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $7,130 - 0
97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program $3,721 - 0
10.902 Soil and Water Conservation $3,282 - 0
84.305 Education Research, Development and Dissemination $3,032 - 0
93.318 Protecting and Improving Health Globally: Building and Strengthening Public Health Impact, Systems, Capacity and Security $2,959 - 0
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant $2,835 - 0
12.598 Centers for Academic Excellence $2,310 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
XMDHUN8FUPN9 Patrick F. Vrba Auditee
2104850356 Greg Peterson Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE RECONCILIATION Accounting Policies: The expenditures included in the schedule are reported for the District's fiscal year. Expenditure reports to funding agencies are prepared on the award period basis. The expenditures reported above represent funds that have been expended by the District for the purposes of the award. The expenditures reported above may not have been reimbursed by the funding agencies as of the end of the fiscal year. Some amounts reported in the schedule may differ from amounts used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. Separate accounts are maintained for the different awards to aid in the observance of limitations and restrictions imposed by the funding agencies. Since the District uses agency approved Indirect Recovery Rate it has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rates as permitted in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The District has followed all applicable guidelines issued by various entities in the preparation of the schedule. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table.
Title: EXPENDITURES NOT SUBJECT TO FEDERAL SINGLE AUDIT Accounting Policies: The expenditures included in the schedule are reported for the District's fiscal year. Expenditure reports to funding agencies are prepared on the award period basis. The expenditures reported above represent funds that have been expended by the District for the purposes of the award. The expenditures reported above may not have been reimbursed by the funding agencies as of the end of the fiscal year. Some amounts reported in the schedule may differ from amounts used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. Separate accounts are maintained for the different awards to aid in the observance of limitations and restrictions imposed by the funding agencies. Since the District uses agency approved Indirect Recovery Rate it has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rates as permitted in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The District has followed all applicable guidelines issued by various entities in the preparation of the schedule. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The District did not receive any federal contracts, $0.
Title: FEDERAL DIRECT STUDENT LOAN PROGRAM Accounting Policies: The expenditures included in the schedule are reported for the District's fiscal year. Expenditure reports to funding agencies are prepared on the award period basis. The expenditures reported above represent funds that have been expended by the District for the purposes of the award. The expenditures reported above may not have been reimbursed by the funding agencies as of the end of the fiscal year. Some amounts reported in the schedule may differ from amounts used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. Separate accounts are maintained for the different awards to aid in the observance of limitations and restrictions imposed by the funding agencies. Since the District uses agency approved Indirect Recovery Rate it has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rates as permitted in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The District has followed all applicable guidelines issued by various entities in the preparation of the schedule. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The District participates in the Federal Direct Student Loans program (ALN 84.268). Loans under the Federal Direct Student Loans program are made directly by the federal government to students. Loans disbursed during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2022 totaled $13,950,284 and are presented as current year federal expenditures.
Title: AMOUNTS PASSED-THROUGH BY THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Accounting Policies: The expenditures included in the schedule are reported for the District's fiscal year. Expenditure reports to funding agencies are prepared on the award period basis. The expenditures reported above represent funds that have been expended by the District for the purposes of the award. The expenditures reported above may not have been reimbursed by the funding agencies as of the end of the fiscal year. Some amounts reported in the schedule may differ from amounts used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. Separate accounts are maintained for the different awards to aid in the observance of limitations and restrictions imposed by the funding agencies. Since the District uses agency approved Indirect Recovery Rate it has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rates as permitted in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The District has followed all applicable guidelines issued by various entities in the preparation of the schedule. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table.
Title: NONCASH AWARDS Accounting Policies: The expenditures included in the schedule are reported for the District's fiscal year. Expenditure reports to funding agencies are prepared on the award period basis. The expenditures reported above represent funds that have been expended by the District for the purposes of the award. The expenditures reported above may not have been reimbursed by the funding agencies as of the end of the fiscal year. Some amounts reported in the schedule may differ from amounts used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. Separate accounts are maintained for the different awards to aid in the observance of limitations and restrictions imposed by the funding agencies. Since the District uses agency approved Indirect Recovery Rate it has elected not to use the 10% de minimis cost rates as permitted in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. The District has followed all applicable guidelines issued by various entities in the preparation of the schedule. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. There were no federal noncash awards in fiscal year 2022 other than Federal Direct Student Loans discussed in Note 4 above.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001: Enrollment Reporting Submissions for Graduates U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Assistance Cluster Program Name(s): Federal Pell Grant Program, ALN 84.063 and Federal Direct Student Loans, ALN 84.268 Award Numbers: P063P216822 (Palo Alto College); P063P215081, P268K225081 (San Antonio College) Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement, institutions are required to report enrollment status information under the Pell Grant and the Direct Student Loan programs via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely and accurate manner. The Department of Education (ED) requires the enrollment information to be submitted at least every 60 days. Condition and Context: As part of our testing of the District?s compliance with enrollment reporting requirements, it was noted that for 4 students (all of whom were Pell Grant recipients and 1 was also a Direct Loan recipient; students were attendees of Palo Alto College and San Antonio College) out of the total of 40 students sampled, the District did not ensure that the students? enrollment status of ?Graduated? was reported to NSLDS. The sample size to be tested was not determined using a statistical sampling approach. Cause: The submission of enrollment information is a systemic process in which a report is generated in Banner, the District?s ERP system; the District sends that information to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), who then submits it to the NSLDS. For students who have graduated, the District uses a free service from NSC called DegreeVerify, through which NSC reviews the students on the District?s ?Graduate? file to determine whether it can create a ?Graduated? enrollment record. An exceptions report is then created within NSC listing those students whose status could not be updated to ?graduated?. The District is then required to review the exceptions report and resend the list to NSC indicating that the student?s status does in fact need to be updated to ?Graduated.? The District did not review the exception reports for the current year, which resulted in the 4 students noted above not having their ?Graduated? status reported to NSLDS by NSC. Effect or Potential Effect: The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Complete and accurate reporting of students? enrollment information to NSLDS is critical, as this information is used to determine the subsidy status of certain loans and for other purposes. The lack of timely enrollment reporting could result in either a lack of timely repayments by the borrower or the student being inappropriately moved into loan repayment status. See ?Condition? above for instances of noncompliance identified in the current period which were not identified as material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process to review the DegreeVerify exceptions report and indicate to NSC that student statuses need to be updated to ?Graduated.? This process should be performed with sufficient regularity to ensure that enrollment information reported to the NSLDS is complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan
Finding 2022-001: Enrollment Reporting Submissions for Graduates U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Assistance Cluster Program Name(s): Federal Pell Grant Program, ALN 84.063 and Federal Direct Student Loans, ALN 84.268 Award Numbers: P063P216822 (Palo Alto College); P063P215081, P268K225081 (San Antonio College) Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement, institutions are required to report enrollment status information under the Pell Grant and the Direct Student Loan programs via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely and accurate manner. The Department of Education (ED) requires the enrollment information to be submitted at least every 60 days. Condition and Context: As part of our testing of the District?s compliance with enrollment reporting requirements, it was noted that for 4 students (all of whom were Pell Grant recipients and 1 was also a Direct Loan recipient; students were attendees of Palo Alto College and San Antonio College) out of the total of 40 students sampled, the District did not ensure that the students? enrollment status of ?Graduated? was reported to NSLDS. The sample size to be tested was not determined using a statistical sampling approach. Cause: The submission of enrollment information is a systemic process in which a report is generated in Banner, the District?s ERP system; the District sends that information to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), who then submits it to the NSLDS. For students who have graduated, the District uses a free service from NSC called DegreeVerify, through which NSC reviews the students on the District?s ?Graduate? file to determine whether it can create a ?Graduated? enrollment record. An exceptions report is then created within NSC listing those students whose status could not be updated to ?graduated?. The District is then required to review the exceptions report and resend the list to NSC indicating that the student?s status does in fact need to be updated to ?Graduated.? The District did not review the exception reports for the current year, which resulted in the 4 students noted above not having their ?Graduated? status reported to NSLDS by NSC. Effect or Potential Effect: The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Complete and accurate reporting of students? enrollment information to NSLDS is critical, as this information is used to determine the subsidy status of certain loans and for other purposes. The lack of timely enrollment reporting could result in either a lack of timely repayments by the borrower or the student being inappropriately moved into loan repayment status. See ?Condition? above for instances of noncompliance identified in the current period which were not identified as material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process to review the DegreeVerify exceptions report and indicate to NSC that student statuses need to be updated to ?Graduated.? This process should be performed with sufficient regularity to ensure that enrollment information reported to the NSLDS is complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan
Finding 2022-002: Accuracy of Periodic Grant Reporting U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund, ALN 84.425 Award Numbers: P425F202774 and P425S210113 (Northeast Lakeview College) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) requires institutions to publicly report certain information under Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Subprogram E in one report and HEERF Subprograms F, J, and L in a second report. Each report is required to be accurate and posted each quarter to the institution?s website within specified timeframes. For the quarterly report under Subprograms F, J, and L, institutions are required to report total funds awarded and total amount expended under each Subprogram. Condition and Context: In our testing of the District?s quarterly reporting under HEERF, we noted that 1 out of a sample of 3 quarterly reports tested under Subprograms F, J, and L, which was posted by Northeast Lakeview College, did not include accurate amounts of total funds spent under each Subprogram. The sample size to be tested was not determined using a statistical sampling approach. Per the Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) Reporting and Data Collection resource page, institutions are encouraged but not required to submit HEERF quarterly reports to the ED by emailing them to a designated ED email address. Therefore, it should be noted that the public is the primary audience for the HEERF quarterly reports. Cause: Although controls were in place at each college requiring review of the quarterly reports before being posted to their respective websites, this review process failed to detect the reports? omissions and inaccuracies. Effect or Potential Effect: The public can potentially be misinformed about total amount spent under each Subprogram due to the inaccurate information being reported on the colleges? websites. In addition, ED can potentially be misinformed about student data and use of funds under HEERF. See ?Condition? above for instances of noncompliance identified in the current period which were not identified as material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-003 Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure that those charged with reviewing the quarterly reports have a clear understanding of the relevant reporting requirements in order to ensure that the reports are complete and accurate prior to being posted. In addition, the reports should be reconciled to the corresponding amounts in the District?s financial records prior to posting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan
Finding 2022-002: Accuracy of Periodic Grant Reporting U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund, ALN 84.425 Award Numbers: P425F202774 and P425S210113 (Northeast Lakeview College) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) requires institutions to publicly report certain information under Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Subprogram E in one report and HEERF Subprograms F, J, and L in a second report. Each report is required to be accurate and posted each quarter to the institution?s website within specified timeframes. For the quarterly report under Subprograms F, J, and L, institutions are required to report total funds awarded and total amount expended under each Subprogram. Condition and Context: In our testing of the District?s quarterly reporting under HEERF, we noted that 1 out of a sample of 3 quarterly reports tested under Subprograms F, J, and L, which was posted by Northeast Lakeview College, did not include accurate amounts of total funds spent under each Subprogram. The sample size to be tested was not determined using a statistical sampling approach. Per the Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) Reporting and Data Collection resource page, institutions are encouraged but not required to submit HEERF quarterly reports to the ED by emailing them to a designated ED email address. Therefore, it should be noted that the public is the primary audience for the HEERF quarterly reports. Cause: Although controls were in place at each college requiring review of the quarterly reports before being posted to their respective websites, this review process failed to detect the reports? omissions and inaccuracies. Effect or Potential Effect: The public can potentially be misinformed about total amount spent under each Subprogram due to the inaccurate information being reported on the colleges? websites. In addition, ED can potentially be misinformed about student data and use of funds under HEERF. See ?Condition? above for instances of noncompliance identified in the current period which were not identified as material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-003 Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure that those charged with reviewing the quarterly reports have a clear understanding of the relevant reporting requirements in order to ensure that the reports are complete and accurate prior to being posted. In addition, the reports should be reconciled to the corresponding amounts in the District?s financial records prior to posting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan
Finding 2022-002: Accuracy of Periodic Grant Reporting U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund, ALN 84.425 Award Numbers: P425F202774 and P425S210113 (Northeast Lakeview College) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) requires institutions to publicly report certain information under Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Subprogram E in one report and HEERF Subprograms F, J, and L in a second report. Each report is required to be accurate and posted each quarter to the institution?s website within specified timeframes. For the quarterly report under Subprograms F, J, and L, institutions are required to report total funds awarded and total amount expended under each Subprogram. Condition and Context: In our testing of the District?s quarterly reporting under HEERF, we noted that 1 out of a sample of 3 quarterly reports tested under Subprograms F, J, and L, which was posted by Northeast Lakeview College, did not include accurate amounts of total funds spent under each Subprogram. The sample size to be tested was not determined using a statistical sampling approach. Per the Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) Reporting and Data Collection resource page, institutions are encouraged but not required to submit HEERF quarterly reports to the ED by emailing them to a designated ED email address. Therefore, it should be noted that the public is the primary audience for the HEERF quarterly reports. Cause: Although controls were in place at each college requiring review of the quarterly reports before being posted to their respective websites, this review process failed to detect the reports? omissions and inaccuracies. Effect or Potential Effect: The public can potentially be misinformed about total amount spent under each Subprogram due to the inaccurate information being reported on the colleges? websites. In addition, ED can potentially be misinformed about student data and use of funds under HEERF. See ?Condition? above for instances of noncompliance identified in the current period which were not identified as material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-003 Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure that those charged with reviewing the quarterly reports have a clear understanding of the relevant reporting requirements in order to ensure that the reports are complete and accurate prior to being posted. In addition, the reports should be reconciled to the corresponding amounts in the District?s financial records prior to posting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan
Finding 2022-001: Enrollment Reporting Submissions for Graduates U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Assistance Cluster Program Name(s): Federal Pell Grant Program, ALN 84.063 and Federal Direct Student Loans, ALN 84.268 Award Numbers: P063P216822 (Palo Alto College); P063P215081, P268K225081 (San Antonio College) Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement, institutions are required to report enrollment status information under the Pell Grant and the Direct Student Loan programs via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely and accurate manner. The Department of Education (ED) requires the enrollment information to be submitted at least every 60 days. Condition and Context: As part of our testing of the District?s compliance with enrollment reporting requirements, it was noted that for 4 students (all of whom were Pell Grant recipients and 1 was also a Direct Loan recipient; students were attendees of Palo Alto College and San Antonio College) out of the total of 40 students sampled, the District did not ensure that the students? enrollment status of ?Graduated? was reported to NSLDS. The sample size to be tested was not determined using a statistical sampling approach. Cause: The submission of enrollment information is a systemic process in which a report is generated in Banner, the District?s ERP system; the District sends that information to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), who then submits it to the NSLDS. For students who have graduated, the District uses a free service from NSC called DegreeVerify, through which NSC reviews the students on the District?s ?Graduate? file to determine whether it can create a ?Graduated? enrollment record. An exceptions report is then created within NSC listing those students whose status could not be updated to ?graduated?. The District is then required to review the exceptions report and resend the list to NSC indicating that the student?s status does in fact need to be updated to ?Graduated.? The District did not review the exception reports for the current year, which resulted in the 4 students noted above not having their ?Graduated? status reported to NSLDS by NSC. Effect or Potential Effect: The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Complete and accurate reporting of students? enrollment information to NSLDS is critical, as this information is used to determine the subsidy status of certain loans and for other purposes. The lack of timely enrollment reporting could result in either a lack of timely repayments by the borrower or the student being inappropriately moved into loan repayment status. See ?Condition? above for instances of noncompliance identified in the current period which were not identified as material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process to review the DegreeVerify exceptions report and indicate to NSC that student statuses need to be updated to ?Graduated.? This process should be performed with sufficient regularity to ensure that enrollment information reported to the NSLDS is complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan
Finding 2022-001: Enrollment Reporting Submissions for Graduates U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Assistance Cluster Program Name(s): Federal Pell Grant Program, ALN 84.063 and Federal Direct Student Loans, ALN 84.268 Award Numbers: P063P216822 (Palo Alto College); P063P215081, P268K225081 (San Antonio College) Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement, institutions are required to report enrollment status information under the Pell Grant and the Direct Student Loan programs via the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) in a timely and accurate manner. The Department of Education (ED) requires the enrollment information to be submitted at least every 60 days. Condition and Context: As part of our testing of the District?s compliance with enrollment reporting requirements, it was noted that for 4 students (all of whom were Pell Grant recipients and 1 was also a Direct Loan recipient; students were attendees of Palo Alto College and San Antonio College) out of the total of 40 students sampled, the District did not ensure that the students? enrollment status of ?Graduated? was reported to NSLDS. The sample size to be tested was not determined using a statistical sampling approach. Cause: The submission of enrollment information is a systemic process in which a report is generated in Banner, the District?s ERP system; the District sends that information to the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), who then submits it to the NSLDS. For students who have graduated, the District uses a free service from NSC called DegreeVerify, through which NSC reviews the students on the District?s ?Graduate? file to determine whether it can create a ?Graduated? enrollment record. An exceptions report is then created within NSC listing those students whose status could not be updated to ?graduated?. The District is then required to review the exceptions report and resend the list to NSC indicating that the student?s status does in fact need to be updated to ?Graduated.? The District did not review the exception reports for the current year, which resulted in the 4 students noted above not having their ?Graduated? status reported to NSLDS by NSC. Effect or Potential Effect: The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Complete and accurate reporting of students? enrollment information to NSLDS is critical, as this information is used to determine the subsidy status of certain loans and for other purposes. The lack of timely enrollment reporting could result in either a lack of timely repayments by the borrower or the student being inappropriately moved into loan repayment status. See ?Condition? above for instances of noncompliance identified in the current period which were not identified as material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process to review the DegreeVerify exceptions report and indicate to NSC that student statuses need to be updated to ?Graduated.? This process should be performed with sufficient regularity to ensure that enrollment information reported to the NSLDS is complete and accurate. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan
Finding 2022-002: Accuracy of Periodic Grant Reporting U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund, ALN 84.425 Award Numbers: P425F202774 and P425S210113 (Northeast Lakeview College) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) requires institutions to publicly report certain information under Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Subprogram E in one report and HEERF Subprograms F, J, and L in a second report. Each report is required to be accurate and posted each quarter to the institution?s website within specified timeframes. For the quarterly report under Subprograms F, J, and L, institutions are required to report total funds awarded and total amount expended under each Subprogram. Condition and Context: In our testing of the District?s quarterly reporting under HEERF, we noted that 1 out of a sample of 3 quarterly reports tested under Subprograms F, J, and L, which was posted by Northeast Lakeview College, did not include accurate amounts of total funds spent under each Subprogram. The sample size to be tested was not determined using a statistical sampling approach. Per the Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) Reporting and Data Collection resource page, institutions are encouraged but not required to submit HEERF quarterly reports to the ED by emailing them to a designated ED email address. Therefore, it should be noted that the public is the primary audience for the HEERF quarterly reports. Cause: Although controls were in place at each college requiring review of the quarterly reports before being posted to their respective websites, this review process failed to detect the reports? omissions and inaccuracies. Effect or Potential Effect: The public can potentially be misinformed about total amount spent under each Subprogram due to the inaccurate information being reported on the colleges? websites. In addition, ED can potentially be misinformed about student data and use of funds under HEERF. See ?Condition? above for instances of noncompliance identified in the current period which were not identified as material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-003 Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure that those charged with reviewing the quarterly reports have a clear understanding of the relevant reporting requirements in order to ensure that the reports are complete and accurate prior to being posted. In addition, the reports should be reconciled to the corresponding amounts in the District?s financial records prior to posting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan
Finding 2022-002: Accuracy of Periodic Grant Reporting U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund, ALN 84.425 Award Numbers: P425F202774 and P425S210113 (Northeast Lakeview College) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) requires institutions to publicly report certain information under Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Subprogram E in one report and HEERF Subprograms F, J, and L in a second report. Each report is required to be accurate and posted each quarter to the institution?s website within specified timeframes. For the quarterly report under Subprograms F, J, and L, institutions are required to report total funds awarded and total amount expended under each Subprogram. Condition and Context: In our testing of the District?s quarterly reporting under HEERF, we noted that 1 out of a sample of 3 quarterly reports tested under Subprograms F, J, and L, which was posted by Northeast Lakeview College, did not include accurate amounts of total funds spent under each Subprogram. The sample size to be tested was not determined using a statistical sampling approach. Per the Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) Reporting and Data Collection resource page, institutions are encouraged but not required to submit HEERF quarterly reports to the ED by emailing them to a designated ED email address. Therefore, it should be noted that the public is the primary audience for the HEERF quarterly reports. Cause: Although controls were in place at each college requiring review of the quarterly reports before being posted to their respective websites, this review process failed to detect the reports? omissions and inaccuracies. Effect or Potential Effect: The public can potentially be misinformed about total amount spent under each Subprogram due to the inaccurate information being reported on the colleges? websites. In addition, ED can potentially be misinformed about student data and use of funds under HEERF. See ?Condition? above for instances of noncompliance identified in the current period which were not identified as material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-003 Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure that those charged with reviewing the quarterly reports have a clear understanding of the relevant reporting requirements in order to ensure that the reports are complete and accurate prior to being posted. In addition, the reports should be reconciled to the corresponding amounts in the District?s financial records prior to posting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan
Finding 2022-002: Accuracy of Periodic Grant Reporting U.S. Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund, ALN 84.425 Award Numbers: P425F202774 and P425S210113 (Northeast Lakeview College) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: According to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2022 Compliance Supplement, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) requires institutions to publicly report certain information under Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Subprogram E in one report and HEERF Subprograms F, J, and L in a second report. Each report is required to be accurate and posted each quarter to the institution?s website within specified timeframes. For the quarterly report under Subprograms F, J, and L, institutions are required to report total funds awarded and total amount expended under each Subprogram. Condition and Context: In our testing of the District?s quarterly reporting under HEERF, we noted that 1 out of a sample of 3 quarterly reports tested under Subprograms F, J, and L, which was posted by Northeast Lakeview College, did not include accurate amounts of total funds spent under each Subprogram. The sample size to be tested was not determined using a statistical sampling approach. Per the Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) Reporting and Data Collection resource page, institutions are encouraged but not required to submit HEERF quarterly reports to the ED by emailing them to a designated ED email address. Therefore, it should be noted that the public is the primary audience for the HEERF quarterly reports. Cause: Although controls were in place at each college requiring review of the quarterly reports before being posted to their respective websites, this review process failed to detect the reports? omissions and inaccuracies. Effect or Potential Effect: The public can potentially be misinformed about total amount spent under each Subprogram due to the inaccurate information being reported on the colleges? websites. In addition, ED can potentially be misinformed about student data and use of funds under HEERF. See ?Condition? above for instances of noncompliance identified in the current period which were not identified as material noncompliance. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-003 Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure that those charged with reviewing the quarterly reports have a clear understanding of the relevant reporting requirements in order to ensure that the reports are complete and accurate prior to being posted. In addition, the reports should be reconciled to the corresponding amounts in the District?s financial records prior to posting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan