Audit 332596

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-002 Internal Controls over Expenditures Charged to Federal Award for U.S. DHHS 93.432 ACL Centers for Independent Living #2201MEILCL-00 (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance) Criteria: Management is responsible for the design and implementation of internal controls over expenditures charged to federal award programs. Condition and Context: Through audit procedures testing internal controls over cash disbursements charged to major federal award programs, one expense lacked readily available support and 2 expenses did not have documented approval. Cause: There is shortage of staffing in the finance department and lack of sufficiently documenting procedures to save employees’ time. Effect: Total expenditures charged to the federal award program were inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Expenses charged to major federal award programs for which there was not readily available support or approval of expenditures was not documented totaled $558. Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented requiring documentation be maintained to support every expense charged to federal programs including documentation of approval of expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the audit findings and has already taken immediate corrective action by re-training accounting staff on the importance of maintaining all supporting documentation and obtaining the necessary approvals before processing any cash disbursements. To further strengthen internal controls, management is exploring the implementation of a system upgrade that would automate the documentation and approval process for expenditures charged to federal award programs.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-002 Internal Controls over Expenditures Charged to Federal Award for U.S. DHHS 93.432 ACL Centers for Independent Living #2201MEILCL-00 (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance) Criteria: Management is responsible for the design and implementation of internal controls over expenditures charged to federal award programs. Condition and Context: Through audit procedures testing internal controls over cash disbursements charged to major federal award programs, one expense lacked readily available support and 2 expenses did not have documented approval. Cause: There is shortage of staffing in the finance department and lack of sufficiently documenting procedures to save employees’ time. Effect: Total expenditures charged to the federal award program were inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Expenses charged to major federal award programs for which there was not readily available support or approval of expenditures was not documented totaled $558. Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented requiring documentation be maintained to support every expense charged to federal programs including documentation of approval of expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the audit findings and has already taken immediate corrective action by re-training accounting staff on the importance of maintaining all supporting documentation and obtaining the necessary approvals before processing any cash disbursements. To further strengthen internal controls, management is exploring the implementation of a system upgrade that would automate the documentation and approval process for expenditures charged to federal award programs.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-002 Internal Controls over Expenditures Charged to Federal Award for U.S. DHHS 93.432 ACL Centers for Independent Living #2201MEILCL-00 (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance) Criteria: Management is responsible for the design and implementation of internal controls over expenditures charged to federal award programs. Condition and Context: Through audit procedures testing internal controls over cash disbursements charged to major federal award programs, one expense lacked readily available support and 2 expenses did not have documented approval. Cause: There is shortage of staffing in the finance department and lack of sufficiently documenting procedures to save employees’ time. Effect: Total expenditures charged to the federal award program were inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Expenses charged to major federal award programs for which there was not readily available support or approval of expenditures was not documented totaled $558. Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented requiring documentation be maintained to support every expense charged to federal programs including documentation of approval of expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the audit findings and has already taken immediate corrective action by re-training accounting staff on the importance of maintaining all supporting documentation and obtaining the necessary approvals before processing any cash disbursements. To further strengthen internal controls, management is exploring the implementation of a system upgrade that would automate the documentation and approval process for expenditures charged to federal award programs.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-002 Internal Controls over Expenditures Charged to Federal Award for U.S. DHHS 93.432 ACL Centers for Independent Living #2201MEILCL-00 (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance) Criteria: Management is responsible for the design and implementation of internal controls over expenditures charged to federal award programs. Condition and Context: Through audit procedures testing internal controls over cash disbursements charged to major federal award programs, one expense lacked readily available support and 2 expenses did not have documented approval. Cause: There is shortage of staffing in the finance department and lack of sufficiently documenting procedures to save employees’ time. Effect: Total expenditures charged to the federal award program were inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Expenses charged to major federal award programs for which there was not readily available support or approval of expenditures was not documented totaled $558. Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented requiring documentation be maintained to support every expense charged to federal programs including documentation of approval of expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the audit findings and has already taken immediate corrective action by re-training accounting staff on the importance of maintaining all supporting documentation and obtaining the necessary approvals before processing any cash disbursements. To further strengthen internal controls, management is exploring the implementation of a system upgrade that would automate the documentation and approval process for expenditures charged to federal award programs.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.

2024-003 Internal Controls over Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance)—All Awards) Criteria: 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, £200.508 (b) The auditee must prepare appropriate statements including an accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) in accordance with £200.510, Financial Statements. Condition and Context: The following errors were noted and corrected as a result of auditing procedures on the SEFA: • CRA program federal expenditures (CFDA #14.228) were understated by $23,893. • ACL Independent Living State Grants federal expenditures (CFDA #93.369) were overstated by $21,856 due to errors in SEFA preparation. • Several presentational errors including incorrect identifying numbers listed, incorrect award terms listed, and incorrect CFDA #’s listed for multiple awards. Cause: Insufficient internal controls over the preparation, review, and documentation process for the SEFA and supporting documents. Effect: Errors on reporting can lead to issues in reconciling and tracking of awards earned and recognized in the financial statements. The above corrections, if not made, would have led to the SEFA being materially misstated. They could also lead to findings and corrective action with funders. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should continue to seek additional training for the fiscal department on preparation of the SEFA and reporting standards. In addition, review processes over the SEFA and supporting reports should be strengthened. Both the preparer and reviewer should have a clear understanding of the required minimum elements and instructions. As part of the review, all required minimum elements should be vouched to original source documents including copies of awards, grant reporting, and the trial balance profit and loss reports. Steps should be taken to prevent further adjustment of supporting profit and loss reports once reconciled without the express review and approval of the Fiscal Director. Review of the standards for supporting grant reports should be strengthened to prevent errors in reporting leading to errors on the SEFA. Any inconsistencies should be resolved before beginning the audit. Management has taken steps to identify and seek training in areas they have identified as needing improvement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the audit findings and the material weakness related to the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). The errors identified stemmed from insufficient internal controls over the preparation and review process. Additionally, there were inconsistencies in how the SEFA was prepared in previous years, compounded by a quick turnover to a new controller at year-end, which disrupted continuity and contributed to the lack of clear guidance in the SEFA preparation process. To address these challenges, management has implemented immediate corrective actions, including enhanced training for all staff involved in the SEFA preparation to ensure a thorough understanding of federal reporting standards and the required minimum elements. Furthermore, all SEFA components will be reconciled with original source documents, such as grant awards and trial balances, prior to submission for audit. Management believes that, with the new internal control measures and training in place, these errors are not expected to occur in future years.