Audit 332561

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.54M
Findings
10
Programs
14
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-12-13
Auditor: Eidebailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
514298 2024-004 Material Weakness - L
514299 2024-004 Material Weakness - L
514300 2024-004 Material Weakness - L
514301 2024-004 Material Weakness - L
514302 2024-004 Material Weakness - L
1090740 2024-004 Material Weakness - L
1090741 2024-004 Material Weakness - L
1090742 2024-004 Material Weakness - L
1090743 2024-004 Material Weakness - L
1090744 2024-004 Material Weakness - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
PGLWMX88JTC7 Marcus Askvig Auditee
2184776938 Derek Flanagan Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 – Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the District under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in fund balance or net position of the District.
Title: Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient.
Title: Note 3 – Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. The District has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate.
Title: Note 4 – Food Donation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. Nonmonetary assistance is reported in this schedule at the fair market value of commodities received and disbursed. At June 30, 2024 the District had food commodities totaling $40,480 in inventory.

Finding Details

2024-004 Department of Agriculture, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 10.553/10.555/10.556 Child Nutrition Cluster Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all free and reduced meal reimbursement requests meet the reporting guidelines. Condition – During the course of our engagement, we noted one instance where free and reduced meals were incorrectly submitted to MDE and did not agree to meal count sheets for the month. Cause – The District does not have an internal control system designed to review and ensure submitted meal counts agree to underlying records. Effect – A lack of internal controls over reporting could result the District receiving incorrect amounts of reimbursements from the granting agency. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – A non-statistical sample of 4 out of 12 total reports were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – The District should review internal control procedures to ensure reimbursement requests are reviewed and agree to meal count sheets for the month. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-004 Department of Agriculture, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 10.553/10.555/10.556 Child Nutrition Cluster Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all free and reduced meal reimbursement requests meet the reporting guidelines. Condition – During the course of our engagement, we noted one instance where free and reduced meals were incorrectly submitted to MDE and did not agree to meal count sheets for the month. Cause – The District does not have an internal control system designed to review and ensure submitted meal counts agree to underlying records. Effect – A lack of internal controls over reporting could result the District receiving incorrect amounts of reimbursements from the granting agency. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – A non-statistical sample of 4 out of 12 total reports were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – The District should review internal control procedures to ensure reimbursement requests are reviewed and agree to meal count sheets for the month. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-004 Department of Agriculture, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 10.553/10.555/10.556 Child Nutrition Cluster Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all free and reduced meal reimbursement requests meet the reporting guidelines. Condition – During the course of our engagement, we noted one instance where free and reduced meals were incorrectly submitted to MDE and did not agree to meal count sheets for the month. Cause – The District does not have an internal control system designed to review and ensure submitted meal counts agree to underlying records. Effect – A lack of internal controls over reporting could result the District receiving incorrect amounts of reimbursements from the granting agency. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – A non-statistical sample of 4 out of 12 total reports were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – The District should review internal control procedures to ensure reimbursement requests are reviewed and agree to meal count sheets for the month. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-004 Department of Agriculture, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 10.553/10.555/10.556 Child Nutrition Cluster Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all free and reduced meal reimbursement requests meet the reporting guidelines. Condition – During the course of our engagement, we noted one instance where free and reduced meals were incorrectly submitted to MDE and did not agree to meal count sheets for the month. Cause – The District does not have an internal control system designed to review and ensure submitted meal counts agree to underlying records. Effect – A lack of internal controls over reporting could result the District receiving incorrect amounts of reimbursements from the granting agency. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – A non-statistical sample of 4 out of 12 total reports were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – The District should review internal control procedures to ensure reimbursement requests are reviewed and agree to meal count sheets for the month. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-004 Department of Agriculture, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 10.553/10.555/10.556 Child Nutrition Cluster Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all free and reduced meal reimbursement requests meet the reporting guidelines. Condition – During the course of our engagement, we noted one instance where free and reduced meals were incorrectly submitted to MDE and did not agree to meal count sheets for the month. Cause – The District does not have an internal control system designed to review and ensure submitted meal counts agree to underlying records. Effect – A lack of internal controls over reporting could result the District receiving incorrect amounts of reimbursements from the granting agency. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – A non-statistical sample of 4 out of 12 total reports were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – The District should review internal control procedures to ensure reimbursement requests are reviewed and agree to meal count sheets for the month. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-004 Department of Agriculture, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 10.553/10.555/10.556 Child Nutrition Cluster Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all free and reduced meal reimbursement requests meet the reporting guidelines. Condition – During the course of our engagement, we noted one instance where free and reduced meals were incorrectly submitted to MDE and did not agree to meal count sheets for the month. Cause – The District does not have an internal control system designed to review and ensure submitted meal counts agree to underlying records. Effect – A lack of internal controls over reporting could result the District receiving incorrect amounts of reimbursements from the granting agency. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – A non-statistical sample of 4 out of 12 total reports were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – The District should review internal control procedures to ensure reimbursement requests are reviewed and agree to meal count sheets for the month. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-004 Department of Agriculture, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 10.553/10.555/10.556 Child Nutrition Cluster Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all free and reduced meal reimbursement requests meet the reporting guidelines. Condition – During the course of our engagement, we noted one instance where free and reduced meals were incorrectly submitted to MDE and did not agree to meal count sheets for the month. Cause – The District does not have an internal control system designed to review and ensure submitted meal counts agree to underlying records. Effect – A lack of internal controls over reporting could result the District receiving incorrect amounts of reimbursements from the granting agency. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – A non-statistical sample of 4 out of 12 total reports were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – The District should review internal control procedures to ensure reimbursement requests are reviewed and agree to meal count sheets for the month. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-004 Department of Agriculture, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 10.553/10.555/10.556 Child Nutrition Cluster Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all free and reduced meal reimbursement requests meet the reporting guidelines. Condition – During the course of our engagement, we noted one instance where free and reduced meals were incorrectly submitted to MDE and did not agree to meal count sheets for the month. Cause – The District does not have an internal control system designed to review and ensure submitted meal counts agree to underlying records. Effect – A lack of internal controls over reporting could result the District receiving incorrect amounts of reimbursements from the granting agency. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – A non-statistical sample of 4 out of 12 total reports were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – The District should review internal control procedures to ensure reimbursement requests are reviewed and agree to meal count sheets for the month. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-004 Department of Agriculture, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 10.553/10.555/10.556 Child Nutrition Cluster Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all free and reduced meal reimbursement requests meet the reporting guidelines. Condition – During the course of our engagement, we noted one instance where free and reduced meals were incorrectly submitted to MDE and did not agree to meal count sheets for the month. Cause – The District does not have an internal control system designed to review and ensure submitted meal counts agree to underlying records. Effect – A lack of internal controls over reporting could result the District receiving incorrect amounts of reimbursements from the granting agency. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – A non-statistical sample of 4 out of 12 total reports were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – The District should review internal control procedures to ensure reimbursement requests are reviewed and agree to meal count sheets for the month. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2024-004 Department of Agriculture, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 10.553/10.555/10.556 Child Nutrition Cluster Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all free and reduced meal reimbursement requests meet the reporting guidelines. Condition – During the course of our engagement, we noted one instance where free and reduced meals were incorrectly submitted to MDE and did not agree to meal count sheets for the month. Cause – The District does not have an internal control system designed to review and ensure submitted meal counts agree to underlying records. Effect – A lack of internal controls over reporting could result the District receiving incorrect amounts of reimbursements from the granting agency. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – A non-statistical sample of 4 out of 12 total reports were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – The District should review internal control procedures to ensure reimbursement requests are reviewed and agree to meal count sheets for the month. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.