Audit 332497

FINDING 2024-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A210084, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the audit period, the School District purchased Special Education contracted services from one specialist with aggregate payments for each fiscal year which were within the small purchases threshold ($10,000 - $150,000) under Federal and State procurement regulations. The School District did not solicit multiple quotes for services, document the method and rationale for procurement, and did not perform a check to confirm the service provider was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract and disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District enter into a written contract with service providers funded by federal grants. The contract should include a Suspension and Debarment clause or certification on an annual basis. We also recommend the School District follow their procurement policy for small purchase thresholds, including documenting procurement rationale and suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into the covered transaction funded by federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Activities Allowed or Unallowed Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements charged to the Special Education Cluster during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  For eight transactions selected, management was unable to provide an approved contract to support the selected employees' bi-weekly pay rate.  For two transactions selected, management was unable to provide approved timecards for the selected hourly employee and time period.  For seven transactions selected, management was unable to provide time and effort logs to support the allocation of one employee’s salary between the federal grant and the Education fund. The lack of controls was systematic throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District's management establish a system of internal controls related to payroll disbursement charged to federal awards to ensure that the costs allocated are properly supported by contracts, timecards, and that the methodology for salary employees allocated to grant are supported by time and effort documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Activities Allowed or Unallowed Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements charged to the Special Education Cluster during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  For eight transactions selected, management was unable to provide an approved contract to support the selected employees' bi-weekly pay rate.  For two transactions selected, management was unable to provide approved timecards for the selected hourly employee and time period.  For seven transactions selected, management was unable to provide time and effort logs to support the allocation of one employee’s salary between the federal grant and the Education fund. The lack of controls was systematic throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District's management establish a system of internal controls related to payroll disbursement charged to federal awards to ensure that the costs allocated are properly supported by contracts, timecards, and that the methodology for salary employees allocated to grant are supported by time and effort documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $730.43 Context: During the testing of payroll disbursements charged to the Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  For 16 payroll disbursements, in a sample of 40, management was unable to provide an approved employee contract or hourly rate ordinance to support the selected employees' bi-weekly pay rate.  For one transaction selection, an employee received a $730.43 one-time payment for a Teacher Appreciation Grant (TAG) funded by the 84.425U award. The Teacher Appreciation Grant has its own fund and is a state/local grant received to reward high-performing, eligible certified staff. The selected employee is a non-certified employee and did not qualify for a TAG award. There was no documentation provided to support work performed under this award to support allowability of the cost incurred. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal control to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual Data Collection reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The reports were prepared and submitted in JotForm, the online application used by the Indiana Department of Education to collect information, without an oversight or secondary review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. During tie out of the Year 3 report, a variance between the underlying records and reported expenditures of $187,649 was noted due to the lack of effective controls surrounding annual data reporting. 84.425U expenditures submitted within the Year 3 report were overstated by $187,649. Identification as a repeat finding: Yes, see Finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented, secondary review of the report information prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A210084, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the audit period, the School District purchased Special Education contracted services from one specialist with aggregate payments for each fiscal year which were within the small purchases threshold ($10,000 - $150,000) under Federal and State procurement regulations. The School District did not solicit multiple quotes for services, document the method and rationale for procurement, and did not perform a check to confirm the service provider was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract and disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District enter into a written contract with service providers funded by federal grants. The contract should include a Suspension and Debarment clause or certification on an annual basis. We also recommend the School District follow their procurement policy for small purchase thresholds, including documenting procurement rationale and suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into the covered transaction funded by federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A210084, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the audit period, the School District purchased Special Education contracted services from one specialist with aggregate payments for each fiscal year which were within the small purchases threshold ($10,000 - $150,000) under Federal and State procurement regulations. The School District did not solicit multiple quotes for services, document the method and rationale for procurement, and did not perform a check to confirm the service provider was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract and disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District enter into a written contract with service providers funded by federal grants. The contract should include a Suspension and Debarment clause or certification on an annual basis. We also recommend the School District follow their procurement policy for small purchase thresholds, including documenting procurement rationale and suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into the covered transaction funded by federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A210084, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the audit period, the School District purchased Special Education contracted services from one specialist with aggregate payments for each fiscal year which were within the small purchases threshold ($10,000 - $150,000) under Federal and State procurement regulations. The School District did not solicit multiple quotes for services, document the method and rationale for procurement, and did not perform a check to confirm the service provider was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract and disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District enter into a written contract with service providers funded by federal grants. The contract should include a Suspension and Debarment clause or certification on an annual basis. We also recommend the School District follow their procurement policy for small purchase thresholds, including documenting procurement rationale and suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into the covered transaction funded by federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Activities Allowed or Unallowed Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements charged to the Special Education Cluster during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  For eight transactions selected, management was unable to provide an approved contract to support the selected employees' bi-weekly pay rate.  For two transactions selected, management was unable to provide approved timecards for the selected hourly employee and time period.  For seven transactions selected, management was unable to provide time and effort logs to support the allocation of one employee’s salary between the federal grant and the Education fund. The lack of controls was systematic throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District's management establish a system of internal controls related to payroll disbursement charged to federal awards to ensure that the costs allocated are properly supported by contracts, timecards, and that the methodology for salary employees allocated to grant are supported by time and effort documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Activities Allowed or Unallowed Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements charged to the Special Education Cluster during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  For eight transactions selected, management was unable to provide an approved contract to support the selected employees' bi-weekly pay rate.  For two transactions selected, management was unable to provide approved timecards for the selected hourly employee and time period.  For seven transactions selected, management was unable to provide time and effort logs to support the allocation of one employee’s salary between the federal grant and the Education fund. The lack of controls was systematic throughout the audit period. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District's management establish a system of internal controls related to payroll disbursement charged to federal awards to ensure that the costs allocated are properly supported by contracts, timecards, and that the methodology for salary employees allocated to grant are supported by time and effort documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $730.43 Context: During the testing of payroll disbursements charged to the Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  For 16 payroll disbursements, in a sample of 40, management was unable to provide an approved employee contract or hourly rate ordinance to support the selected employees' bi-weekly pay rate.  For one transaction selection, an employee received a $730.43 one-time payment for a Teacher Appreciation Grant (TAG) funded by the 84.425U award. The Teacher Appreciation Grant has its own fund and is a state/local grant received to reward high-performing, eligible certified staff. The selected employee is a non-certified employee and did not qualify for a TAG award. There was no documentation provided to support work performed under this award to support allowability of the cost incurred. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal control to ensure that the annual Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) annual Data Collection reports (Reports) were complete and accurately submitted. The reports were prepared and submitted in JotForm, the online application used by the Indiana Department of Education to collect information, without an oversight or secondary review process in place to prevent, or detect and correct, errors. During tie out of the Year 3 report, a variance between the underlying records and reported expenditures of $187,649 was noted due to the lack of effective controls surrounding annual data reporting. 84.425U expenditures submitted within the Year 3 report were overstated by $187,649. Identification as a repeat finding: Yes, see Finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented, secondary review of the report information prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A210084, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the audit period, the School District purchased Special Education contracted services from one specialist with aggregate payments for each fiscal year which were within the small purchases threshold ($10,000 - $150,000) under Federal and State procurement regulations. The School District did not solicit multiple quotes for services, document the method and rationale for procurement, and did not perform a check to confirm the service provider was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract and disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District enter into a written contract with service providers funded by federal grants. The contract should include a Suspension and Debarment clause or certification on an annual basis. We also recommend the School District follow their procurement policy for small purchase thresholds, including documenting procurement rationale and suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into the covered transaction funded by federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-005 Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): H027A210084, H027A220084, H027A230084 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: During the audit period, the School District purchased Special Education contracted services from one specialist with aggregate payments for each fiscal year which were within the small purchases threshold ($10,000 - $150,000) under Federal and State procurement regulations. The School District did not solicit multiple quotes for services, document the method and rationale for procurement, and did not perform a check to confirm the service provider was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract and disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District enter into a written contract with service providers funded by federal grants. The contract should include a Suspension and Debarment clause or certification on an annual basis. We also recommend the School District follow their procurement policy for small purchase thresholds, including documenting procurement rationale and suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into the covered transaction funded by federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.