Audit 332334

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$1.79M
Findings
2
Programs
15
Organization: Grant County (MN)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-12-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
XC3MLUM9NVB6 Chad Van Santen Auditee
2186858236 Julie Blaha Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Reconciliation to Schedule of Intergovernmental Revenue Accounting Policies: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Reporting Entity The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents the activities of federal award programs expended by Grant County. The County’s reporting entity is defined in Note 1 to the financial statements. The schedule does not include $301,256 in federal awards expended by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Grant County component unit. The component unit is legally separate from the primary government and expended less than $750,000 of federal awards for the year ended December 31, 2023, and, therefore, was not subject to the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Grant County under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Because the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents only a selected portion of the operations of Grant County, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of Grant County. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: De Minimis Cost Rate Grant County has elected to not use the ten percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. See Notes to the SEFA for Charts/Table

Finding Details

2023-005 Suspension and Debarment Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Year of Finding Origination: 2023 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: SLFRP4411; 2021 Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Direct Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Federal requirements prohibit non-federal entities from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.300 describes a required verification process. Prior to entering into the transaction, one of the following must be performed: (1) checking SAM.gov exclusions, (2) collecting a certification, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction. Condition: For both covered transactions selected for testing, the County did not perform the verification for suspended or debarred vendors prior to entering into the covered transactions. Questioned Costs: None. Context: There were four covered transactions during the year. The County provided funds to entities which have operated for many years and were familiar to the County. In addition, neither of the vendors tested were listed as suspended or debarred on SAM.gov at the time of the audit. The sample size was based on guidance from Chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Effect: Failure to verify vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into a covered transaction may result in the County entering into a transaction with a vendor that is not authorized to provide goods and services under the grant. Cause: County staff were not aware of the requirement. Recommendation: We recommend the County maintain documentation to demonstrate that vendors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from conducting business with the County; this documentation should be completed prior to entering into a covered transaction. View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge
2023-005 Suspension and Debarment Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Year of Finding Origination: 2023 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: SLFRP4411; 2021 Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Direct Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Federal requirements prohibit non-federal entities from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.300 describes a required verification process. Prior to entering into the transaction, one of the following must be performed: (1) checking SAM.gov exclusions, (2) collecting a certification, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction. Condition: For both covered transactions selected for testing, the County did not perform the verification for suspended or debarred vendors prior to entering into the covered transactions. Questioned Costs: None. Context: There were four covered transactions during the year. The County provided funds to entities which have operated for many years and were familiar to the County. In addition, neither of the vendors tested were listed as suspended or debarred on SAM.gov at the time of the audit. The sample size was based on guidance from Chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Effect: Failure to verify vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into a covered transaction may result in the County entering into a transaction with a vendor that is not authorized to provide goods and services under the grant. Cause: County staff were not aware of the requirement. Recommendation: We recommend the County maintain documentation to demonstrate that vendors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from conducting business with the County; this documentation should be completed prior to entering into a covered transaction. View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge