Audit 332320

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$17.95M
Findings
24
Programs
18
Organization: Cherokee County School District (SC)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-12-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
514137 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
514138 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
514139 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
514140 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
514141 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
514142 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
514143 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
514144 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
514145 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B
514146 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B
514147 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B
514148 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B
1090579 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
1090580 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
1090581 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
1090582 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
1090583 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
1090584 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
1090585 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
1090586 2024-004 Material Weakness - B
1090587 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B
1090588 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B
1090589 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B
1090590 2024-003 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
M54XTPHKB557 Sandy Isom Auditee
8642062201 David Phillips Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: GENERAL: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the “Schedule”) presents the activity of all federal award programs of Cherokee County School District, South Carolina (the “District”) for the year ended June 30, 2024. All federal awards received directly from the federal agencies, as well as those passed through other government agencies, are included on the Schedule. BASIS OF ACCOUNTING: The accompanying Schedule is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting, which is described in the notes to the District’s financial statements. RELATIONSHIP TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Federal award expenditures are reported in the District’s financial statements as expenditures in the Special Revenue Funds. RELATIONSHIP TO FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORTS: Amounts reported in the accompanying schedule agree with the amounts reported in the related federal financial reports except for timing differences relating to expenditures made subsequent to the filing of the federal financial reports. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: The District inadvertently claimed ESSER funds of approximately $29,000 twice. CRITERIA: ESSER funds should only be claimed once for allowable expenditures. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: During the audit, it was discovered that the District claimed ESSER funds twice. The District recorded a payable in the prior year that was not claimed until the current year resulting in a deficit fund balance in the prior year. The expenditure was first claimed in the current year when it was paid and was claimed again in the current year when the District made an entry to balance revenues and expenditures (when really revenues needed to exceed expenditures to cover the prior year deficit fund balance). This resulted in the District claiming the expenditure twice. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the District ensure that expenditures are only being claimed once. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: The District inadvertently claimed ESSER funds of approximately $29,000 twice. CRITERIA: ESSER funds should only be claimed once for allowable expenditures. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: During the audit, it was discovered that the District claimed ESSER funds twice. The District recorded a payable in the prior year that was not claimed until the current year resulting in a deficit fund balance in the prior year. The expenditure was first claimed in the current year when it was paid and was claimed again in the current year when the District made an entry to balance revenues and expenditures (when really revenues needed to exceed expenditures to cover the prior year deficit fund balance). This resulted in the District claiming the expenditure twice. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the District ensure that expenditures are only being claimed once. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: The District inadvertently claimed ESSER funds of approximately $29,000 twice. CRITERIA: ESSER funds should only be claimed once for allowable expenditures. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: During the audit, it was discovered that the District claimed ESSER funds twice. The District recorded a payable in the prior year that was not claimed until the current year resulting in a deficit fund balance in the prior year. The expenditure was first claimed in the current year when it was paid and was claimed again in the current year when the District made an entry to balance revenues and expenditures (when really revenues needed to exceed expenditures to cover the prior year deficit fund balance). This resulted in the District claiming the expenditure twice. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the District ensure that expenditures are only being claimed once. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: The District inadvertently claimed ESSER funds of approximately $29,000 twice. CRITERIA: ESSER funds should only be claimed once for allowable expenditures. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: During the audit, it was discovered that the District claimed ESSER funds twice. The District recorded a payable in the prior year that was not claimed until the current year resulting in a deficit fund balance in the prior year. The expenditure was first claimed in the current year when it was paid and was claimed again in the current year when the District made an entry to balance revenues and expenditures (when really revenues needed to exceed expenditures to cover the prior year deficit fund balance). This resulted in the District claiming the expenditure twice. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the District ensure that expenditures are only being claimed once. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: For the District’s Title I grants, the District did not properly obtain semi-annual certifications or personnel activity reports supporting the time and effort of 15 employees that worked on this federal program. The District also charged one employee to the program that was not included in the Title I plans and overcharged one employee that should have only been partially funded with Title I. CRITERIA: The District was not fully complying with the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) and the South Carolina State Department of Education’s (“SDE”) requirements for proper support for federal salaries and wages for this program. Title I funds should generally only be claimed for employees whose salaries and benefits are included in the Title I plans. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: Where employees are expected to work solely on a single federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications. These certifications are to be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or the supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports. The District had reasonable supporting documentation for most of the payroll charged to this program, but inadvertently did not complete the time and effort documents as required by the SDE. The District budgeted positions and activities in the Title I program but the actual employees charged to the program were not always communicated to the program director therefore the time and effort documents were not always properly completed. The District’s auditors tested approximately $353,000 in key items related to payroll in the Title I program and noted two exceptions for approximately $87,000 in questioned costs (related to two employees). The District’s auditors tested a random sample of other payroll Title I expenditures and noted two exceptions of approximately $23,000 in questioned costs (related to one of the same employees in our key item testing). The amount of known random questioned costs extrapolated to the remaining random population resulted in potential random questioned costs of approximately $223,000. The key items and random items likely questioned costs related to allowable costs was approximately $310,000 for the Title I program for fiscal year 2024. RECOMMENDATION: The District is implementing procedures to ensure compliance with OMB and SDE requirements and to ensure only employees in the Title I plan are appropriately charged to the program. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan beginning on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: The District inadvertently claimed ESSER funds of approximately $29,000 twice. CRITERIA: ESSER funds should only be claimed once for allowable expenditures. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: During the audit, it was discovered that the District claimed ESSER funds twice. The District recorded a payable in the prior year that was not claimed until the current year resulting in a deficit fund balance in the prior year. The expenditure was first claimed in the current year when it was paid and was claimed again in the current year when the District made an entry to balance revenues and expenditures (when really revenues needed to exceed expenditures to cover the prior year deficit fund balance). This resulted in the District claiming the expenditure twice. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the District ensure that expenditures are only being claimed once. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: The District inadvertently claimed ESSER funds of approximately $29,000 twice. CRITERIA: ESSER funds should only be claimed once for allowable expenditures. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: During the audit, it was discovered that the District claimed ESSER funds twice. The District recorded a payable in the prior year that was not claimed until the current year resulting in a deficit fund balance in the prior year. The expenditure was first claimed in the current year when it was paid and was claimed again in the current year when the District made an entry to balance revenues and expenditures (when really revenues needed to exceed expenditures to cover the prior year deficit fund balance). This resulted in the District claiming the expenditure twice. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the District ensure that expenditures are only being claimed once. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: The District inadvertently claimed ESSER funds of approximately $29,000 twice. CRITERIA: ESSER funds should only be claimed once for allowable expenditures. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: During the audit, it was discovered that the District claimed ESSER funds twice. The District recorded a payable in the prior year that was not claimed until the current year resulting in a deficit fund balance in the prior year. The expenditure was first claimed in the current year when it was paid and was claimed again in the current year when the District made an entry to balance revenues and expenditures (when really revenues needed to exceed expenditures to cover the prior year deficit fund balance). This resulted in the District claiming the expenditure twice. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the District ensure that expenditures are only being claimed once. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan on page 120 in this audit report.
CONDITION: The District inadvertently claimed ESSER funds of approximately $29,000 twice. CRITERIA: ESSER funds should only be claimed once for allowable expenditures. CONTEXT, CAUSE, AND EFFECT: During the audit, it was discovered that the District claimed ESSER funds twice. The District recorded a payable in the prior year that was not claimed until the current year resulting in a deficit fund balance in the prior year. The expenditure was first claimed in the current year when it was paid and was claimed again in the current year when the District made an entry to balance revenues and expenditures (when really revenues needed to exceed expenditures to cover the prior year deficit fund balance). This resulted in the District claiming the expenditure twice. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the District ensure that expenditures are only being claimed once. RESPONSE: The District agrees with this finding and will adhere to the corrective action plan on page 120 in this audit report.