Audit 331887

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$926,546
Findings
2
Programs
1
Organization: Asi - Anoka County, Inc. (MN)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-12-11

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
513871 2024-001 - - B
1090313 2024-001 - - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities $75,546 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
GXQMYA88LNT6 Ling Han Auditee
6516457271 Brian Baker Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. ASI Anoka County, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: ASI Anoka County, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of ASI Anoka County, Inc., HUD Project No. 092-HD029-WPD, and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of ASI Anoka County, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of ASI Anoka County, Inc.
Title: NOTE B – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. ASI Anoka County, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: ASI Anoka County, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. ASI Anoka County, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: NOTE C - U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOAN PROGRAM Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. ASI Anoka County, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: ASI Anoka County, Inc. has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. There are no HUD loans in this Project.

Finding Details

C. Findings and Questioned Costs - Major Federal Award Programs Audit DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2024-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Criteria: The management company should calculate management fees using the correct formula. Effect: The Project's management fee expense is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. Through testing, it was determined that the total cash receipts number used to calculate management fee was overstated. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - N/A, $8,761; Sample - N/A, $8,761; Not in Compliance - N/A, $8,761; Questioned Costs - $246. Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $246 to the Project. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the management fee overpayment as soon as possible. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $246; Non-compliance code - J
C. Findings and Questioned Costs - Major Federal Award Programs Audit DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2024-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Criteria: The management company should calculate management fees using the correct formula. Effect: The Project's management fee expense is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. Through testing, it was determined that the total cash receipts number used to calculate management fee was overstated. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - N/A, $8,761; Sample - N/A, $8,761; Not in Compliance - N/A, $8,761; Questioned Costs - $246. Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $246 to the Project. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the management fee overpayment as soon as possible. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $246; Non-compliance code - J