Audit 331352

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$1.08M
Findings
10
Programs
4
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-12-08

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
513468 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
513469 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
513470 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
513471 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
513472 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1089910 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1089911 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1089912 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1089913 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1089914 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P

Contacts

Name Title Type
TVRBNHGJQKC1 Jeff McLain Auditee
8036491900 Matthew Phillips Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1- BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: THE INFORMATION IN THIS SCHEDULE IS PRESENTED ON THE MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE. BECAUSE THE SCHEDULE PRESENTS ONLY A SELECTED PORTION OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE COMMISSION, IT IS NOT INTENDED TO AND DOES NOT PRESENT THE FINANCIAL POSITION OR CHANGES IN NET POSITION OF THE COMMISSION. EXPENDITURES ARE RECOGNIZED FOLLOWING THE COST PRINCIPLES CONTAINED IN 2 CFR PART 200, COST PRINCIPLES FOR STATES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND INDIAN TRIBES, WHEREIN CERTAIN TYPES OF EXPENDITURES ARE NOT ALLOWABLE OR ARE LIMITED AS TO REIMBURSEMENT. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: THE AUDITEE DID NOT USE THE DE MINIMIS COST RATE. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of the Aiken County Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting and in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Commission, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the Commission.
Title: NOTE 2- COST PRINCIPLES Accounting Policies: THE INFORMATION IN THIS SCHEDULE IS PRESENTED ON THE MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE. BECAUSE THE SCHEDULE PRESENTS ONLY A SELECTED PORTION OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE COMMISSION, IT IS NOT INTENDED TO AND DOES NOT PRESENT THE FINANCIAL POSITION OR CHANGES IN NET POSITION OF THE COMMISSION. EXPENDITURES ARE RECOGNIZED FOLLOWING THE COST PRINCIPLES CONTAINED IN 2 CFR PART 200, COST PRINCIPLES FOR STATES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND INDIAN TRIBES, WHEREIN CERTAIN TYPES OF EXPENDITURES ARE NOT ALLOWABLE OR ARE LIMITED AS TO REIMBURSEMENT. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: THE AUDITEE DID NOT USE THE DE MINIMIS COST RATE. Expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in 2 CFR Part 200, Cost Principles for States, Local Governments, and Indian Tribes, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Matching costs, i.e., the non-federal share of certain program costs, are not included in the Schedule.
Title: NOTE 3- INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: THE INFORMATION IN THIS SCHEDULE IS PRESENTED ON THE MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE. BECAUSE THE SCHEDULE PRESENTS ONLY A SELECTED PORTION OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE COMMISSION, IT IS NOT INTENDED TO AND DOES NOT PRESENT THE FINANCIAL POSITION OR CHANGES IN NET POSITION OF THE COMMISSION. EXPENDITURES ARE RECOGNIZED FOLLOWING THE COST PRINCIPLES CONTAINED IN 2 CFR PART 200, COST PRINCIPLES FOR STATES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND INDIAN TRIBES, WHEREIN CERTAIN TYPES OF EXPENDITURES ARE NOT ALLOWABLE OR ARE LIMITED AS TO REIMBURSEMENT. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: THE AUDITEE DID NOT USE THE DE MINIMIS COST RATE. The Commission has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

THERE IS A LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES THAT ENABLES THE SAME INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH PHYSICAL ASSETS AND THE RELATED ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR TO ALL PHASES OF A TRANSACTION.
THERE IS A LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES THAT ENABLES THE SAME INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH PHYSICAL ASSETS AND THE RELATED ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR TO ALL PHASES OF A TRANSACTION.
THERE IS A LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES THAT ENABLES THE SAME INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH PHYSICAL ASSETS AND THE RELATED ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR TO ALL PHASES OF A TRANSACTION.
THERE IS A LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES THAT ENABLES THE SAME INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH PHYSICAL ASSETS AND THE RELATED ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR TO ALL PHASES OF A TRANSACTION.
THERE IS A LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES THAT ENABLES THE SAME INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH PHYSICAL ASSETS AND THE RELATED ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR TO ALL PHASES OF A TRANSACTION.
THERE IS A LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES THAT ENABLES THE SAME INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH PHYSICAL ASSETS AND THE RELATED ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR TO ALL PHASES OF A TRANSACTION.
THERE IS A LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES THAT ENABLES THE SAME INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH PHYSICAL ASSETS AND THE RELATED ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR TO ALL PHASES OF A TRANSACTION.
THERE IS A LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES THAT ENABLES THE SAME INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH PHYSICAL ASSETS AND THE RELATED ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR TO ALL PHASES OF A TRANSACTION.
THERE IS A LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES THAT ENABLES THE SAME INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH PHYSICAL ASSETS AND THE RELATED ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR TO ALL PHASES OF A TRANSACTION.
THERE IS A LACK OF SEGREGATION OF ACCOUNTING DUTIES THAT ENABLES THE SAME INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH PHYSICAL ASSETS AND THE RELATED ACCOUNTING RECORDS OR TO ALL PHASES OF A TRANSACTION.