Audit 33079

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$1.49M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Organization: City of West Melbourne, Florida (FL)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-04-20

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
33326 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - L
609768 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.49M Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
CM4ABKKEZ4T8 Candice Blake Auditee
3218377775 Yvonne Clayborne Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: A. Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable, or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: D. Indirect Cost RateThe City of West Melbourne, Florida has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the City of West Melbourne, Florida, under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City of West Melbourne, Florida, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the City of West Melbourne, Florida.
Title: C. Subrecipients Accounting Policies: B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable, or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: D. Indirect Cost RateThe City of West Melbourne, Florida has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The City of West Melbourne, Florida had no subrecipients of federal awards in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022.
Title: E. Noncash Awards Accounting Policies: B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable, or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: D. Indirect Cost RateThe City of West Melbourne, Florida has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The City of West Melbourne, Florida received no non-cash awards in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022.

Finding Details

B. Internal Control Over Compliance 2022-002 Review of Reports U.S. Department of the Treasury ALN 21.027 ? COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Contract No. Y5314 (2021) 2022 Funding Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Internal controls over compliance should include controls related to financial reporting required by the grantor. Reports should be subject to independent review to verify completeness, validity and timeliness of the submission. Condition: There was no documentary evidence of the City Manager?s review of the quarterly reports submitted. Cause of condition: The City does not have a specific policy for retention of documentary evidence of review and approval of grant reporting. Potential effect of condition: A report might be submitted that was not reviewed by the City Manager and may contain incorrect or incomplete information. Questioned Costs: None noted. Perspective (Context): This is a documentation issue related to the review of quarterly reports. Approval of the reports by the City Manager was being provided verbally. Three quarterly reports were applicable to the current audit period, all of which were submitted timely. Reports included information over construction projects. Recommendation: We recommend the City retain documentation of the review of the quarterly reports required by the grantor. This can be accomplished through the use of an email from the City Manager indicating that his review has been completed and that the report has been approved for release to the grantor. Management?s Response and Planned Corrective Action: The City recognizes the requirement to document review of the quarterly reports and has implemented a new process to ensure compliance with this requirement in the future.
B. Internal Control Over Compliance 2022-002 Review of Reports U.S. Department of the Treasury ALN 21.027 ? COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Contract No. Y5314 (2021) 2022 Funding Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Internal controls over compliance should include controls related to financial reporting required by the grantor. Reports should be subject to independent review to verify completeness, validity and timeliness of the submission. Condition: There was no documentary evidence of the City Manager?s review of the quarterly reports submitted. Cause of condition: The City does not have a specific policy for retention of documentary evidence of review and approval of grant reporting. Potential effect of condition: A report might be submitted that was not reviewed by the City Manager and may contain incorrect or incomplete information. Questioned Costs: None noted. Perspective (Context): This is a documentation issue related to the review of quarterly reports. Approval of the reports by the City Manager was being provided verbally. Three quarterly reports were applicable to the current audit period, all of which were submitted timely. Reports included information over construction projects. Recommendation: We recommend the City retain documentation of the review of the quarterly reports required by the grantor. This can be accomplished through the use of an email from the City Manager indicating that his review has been completed and that the report has been approved for release to the grantor. Management?s Response and Planned Corrective Action: The City recognizes the requirement to document review of the quarterly reports and has implemented a new process to ensure compliance with this requirement in the future.