Audit 330368

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.89M
Findings
4
Programs
2
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-12-02

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
512543 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - L
512544 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - L
1088985 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - L
1088986 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
11.307 Economic Adjustment Assistance $1.58M Yes 1
81.041 State Energy Program $80,000 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
XEK7M68KL688 Jay Trusty Auditee
5078361634 Nathan Kinner Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 4 - LOANS OUTSTANDING Accounting Policies: This accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal award activity of Southwest Regional Development Commission. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in the preparation of the basic financial statements. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, where in certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Southwest Regional Development Commission has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate, as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Southwest Regional Development Commission had the following loan balances outstanding at June 30, 2022. These loan balances, along with the current cash balances and administrative expenses for the year are also included in the federal expenditures presented in the schedule. Economic Assistance Adjustment CFDA #11.307 $1,418,325 COVID Economic Assistance CFDA #11.307 $1,379,472

Finding Details

CASEFILE REVIEW Federal Agency: U.S Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Covid-19 Economic Adjustment Assistance (Economic Development Cluster) Assistance Listing Number: 11.307 Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Direct Pass-Through Numbers: N/A – Direct Federal Award Identification Number and Year: ED20CHI3070049 and 06-79-06218 Compliance Requirement Affected: Reporting Award Period: Year Ended: June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: Standard internal control procedures recommend that all reports should have supporting documentation of review and documentation of the date of submission. Condition: There was no formal review documented over several reports tested, some reports were not submitted timely as required by the specific award requirements, and one report did not have supporting documentation on hand. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing of reporting and inquiry, it was noted that SF-425 reports, ED-209 reports, and progress reports did not have formal documentation of review. In addition, two of four SF-425 and two of four progress reports were not submitted timely. Finally, two of the four progress reports did not have supporting documentation on hand to support what was submitted. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Effect: The Commission could have submitted inaccurate reports or not submitted them timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement procedures to ensure all reports have proof of review and submission, as well as working towards submitting all reports timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Individual responsible: Jay Trusty, Executive Director
CASEFILE REVIEW Federal Agency: U.S Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Covid-19 Economic Adjustment Assistance (Economic Development Cluster) Assistance Listing Number: 11.307 Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Direct Pass-Through Numbers: N/A – Direct Federal Award Identification Number and Year: ED20CHI3070049 and 06-79-06218 Compliance Requirement Affected: Reporting Award Period: Year Ended: June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: Standard internal control procedures recommend that all reports should have supporting documentation of review and documentation of the date of submission. Condition: There was no formal review documented over several reports tested, some reports were not submitted timely as required by the specific award requirements, and one report did not have supporting documentation on hand. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing of reporting and inquiry, it was noted that SF-425 reports, ED-209 reports, and progress reports did not have formal documentation of review. In addition, two of four SF-425 and two of four progress reports were not submitted timely. Finally, two of the four progress reports did not have supporting documentation on hand to support what was submitted. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Effect: The Commission could have submitted inaccurate reports or not submitted them timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement procedures to ensure all reports have proof of review and submission, as well as working towards submitting all reports timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Individual responsible: Jay Trusty, Executive Director
CASEFILE REVIEW Federal Agency: U.S Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Covid-19 Economic Adjustment Assistance (Economic Development Cluster) Assistance Listing Number: 11.307 Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Direct Pass-Through Numbers: N/A – Direct Federal Award Identification Number and Year: ED20CHI3070049 and 06-79-06218 Compliance Requirement Affected: Reporting Award Period: Year Ended: June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: Standard internal control procedures recommend that all reports should have supporting documentation of review and documentation of the date of submission. Condition: There was no formal review documented over several reports tested, some reports were not submitted timely as required by the specific award requirements, and one report did not have supporting documentation on hand. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing of reporting and inquiry, it was noted that SF-425 reports, ED-209 reports, and progress reports did not have formal documentation of review. In addition, two of four SF-425 and two of four progress reports were not submitted timely. Finally, two of the four progress reports did not have supporting documentation on hand to support what was submitted. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Effect: The Commission could have submitted inaccurate reports or not submitted them timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement procedures to ensure all reports have proof of review and submission, as well as working towards submitting all reports timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Individual responsible: Jay Trusty, Executive Director
CASEFILE REVIEW Federal Agency: U.S Department of Commerce Federal Program Name: Covid-19 Economic Adjustment Assistance (Economic Development Cluster) Assistance Listing Number: 11.307 Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Direct Pass-Through Numbers: N/A – Direct Federal Award Identification Number and Year: ED20CHI3070049 and 06-79-06218 Compliance Requirement Affected: Reporting Award Period: Year Ended: June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: Standard internal control procedures recommend that all reports should have supporting documentation of review and documentation of the date of submission. Condition: There was no formal review documented over several reports tested, some reports were not submitted timely as required by the specific award requirements, and one report did not have supporting documentation on hand. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing of reporting and inquiry, it was noted that SF-425 reports, ED-209 reports, and progress reports did not have formal documentation of review. In addition, two of four SF-425 and two of four progress reports were not submitted timely. Finally, two of the four progress reports did not have supporting documentation on hand to support what was submitted. Cause: Lack of management oversight. Effect: The Commission could have submitted inaccurate reports or not submitted them timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Commission implement procedures to ensure all reports have proof of review and submission, as well as working towards submitting all reports timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Individual responsible: Jay Trusty, Executive Director