Audit 330141

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$5.22M
Findings
6
Programs
3
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-11-27
Auditor: Moss Adams LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
512419 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I
512420 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I
512421 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I
1088861 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I
1088862 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I
1088863 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.575 General Child Care and Development Programs $4.29M Yes 1
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $530,082 - 0
93.596 General Child Care and Development Programs $256,749 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
WV8WWS4CNDK5 James Masias Auditee
8585697273 Danielle O'Connor Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 – Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Note 2 – Basis of Accounting Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles in Subpart E contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: EES has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The above accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards (the Schedule) includes the federal and state award activity of Educational Enrichment Systems, Inc. (EES) under programs of the federal and state government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), and the Audit Guide issued by the California Department of Education and California Department of Social Services. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of EES, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of EES.
Title: Note 2 – Basis of Accounting Accounting Policies: Note 2 – Basis of Accounting Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles in Subpart E contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: EES has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles in Subpart E contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. EES has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

FINDING 2024-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance (See Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs for table included) Criteria – 2 CFR 200 section 318(i): Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition/Context – A sample of 10 vendors was selected and documentation of procurement history was requested. For 4 of the 10 vendors selected, EES had not retained or was unable to provide documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and the bids or other basis for the contract price. Questioned Costs – None Effect – If controls are not operating effectively and documentation is not maintained, EES may purchase goods or services that do not meet the requirements of their procurement policy, which is based on federal and state regulations. Cause – EES does not have a formal process in place for documenting and retaining documentation of vendor procurement considerations in accordance with their procurement policy. Repeat finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend EES reviews their procurement policy and ensures purchases are analyzed consistent with policy, and that the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the bids or quotes obtained as the basis for the contract price are documented and retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – EES will review their policies and procedures for reasonableness and alignment with the Funding Terms and Conditions for the CDE and CDSS. Once completed, EES will implement proper procedures and controls ensuring that appropriate documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and bids or other basis for the contract price happen in practice.
FINDING 2024-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance (See Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs for table included) Criteria – 2 CFR 200 section 318(i): Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition/Context – A sample of 10 vendors was selected and documentation of procurement history was requested. For 4 of the 10 vendors selected, EES had not retained or was unable to provide documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and the bids or other basis for the contract price. Questioned Costs – None Effect – If controls are not operating effectively and documentation is not maintained, EES may purchase goods or services that do not meet the requirements of their procurement policy, which is based on federal and state regulations. Cause – EES does not have a formal process in place for documenting and retaining documentation of vendor procurement considerations in accordance with their procurement policy. Repeat finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend EES reviews their procurement policy and ensures purchases are analyzed consistent with policy, and that the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the bids or quotes obtained as the basis for the contract price are documented and retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – EES will review their policies and procedures for reasonableness and alignment with the Funding Terms and Conditions for the CDE and CDSS. Once completed, EES will implement proper procedures and controls ensuring that appropriate documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and bids or other basis for the contract price happen in practice.
FINDING 2024-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance (See Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs for table included) Criteria – 2 CFR 200 section 318(i): Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition/Context – A sample of 10 vendors was selected and documentation of procurement history was requested. For 4 of the 10 vendors selected, EES had not retained or was unable to provide documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and the bids or other basis for the contract price. Questioned Costs – None Effect – If controls are not operating effectively and documentation is not maintained, EES may purchase goods or services that do not meet the requirements of their procurement policy, which is based on federal and state regulations. Cause – EES does not have a formal process in place for documenting and retaining documentation of vendor procurement considerations in accordance with their procurement policy. Repeat finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend EES reviews their procurement policy and ensures purchases are analyzed consistent with policy, and that the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the bids or quotes obtained as the basis for the contract price are documented and retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – EES will review their policies and procedures for reasonableness and alignment with the Funding Terms and Conditions for the CDE and CDSS. Once completed, EES will implement proper procedures and controls ensuring that appropriate documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and bids or other basis for the contract price happen in practice.
FINDING 2024-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance (See Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs for table included) Criteria – 2 CFR 200 section 318(i): Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition/Context – A sample of 10 vendors was selected and documentation of procurement history was requested. For 4 of the 10 vendors selected, EES had not retained or was unable to provide documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and the bids or other basis for the contract price. Questioned Costs – None Effect – If controls are not operating effectively and documentation is not maintained, EES may purchase goods or services that do not meet the requirements of their procurement policy, which is based on federal and state regulations. Cause – EES does not have a formal process in place for documenting and retaining documentation of vendor procurement considerations in accordance with their procurement policy. Repeat finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend EES reviews their procurement policy and ensures purchases are analyzed consistent with policy, and that the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the bids or quotes obtained as the basis for the contract price are documented and retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – EES will review their policies and procedures for reasonableness and alignment with the Funding Terms and Conditions for the CDE and CDSS. Once completed, EES will implement proper procedures and controls ensuring that appropriate documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and bids or other basis for the contract price happen in practice.
FINDING 2024-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance (See Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs for table included) Criteria – 2 CFR 200 section 318(i): Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition/Context – A sample of 10 vendors was selected and documentation of procurement history was requested. For 4 of the 10 vendors selected, EES had not retained or was unable to provide documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and the bids or other basis for the contract price. Questioned Costs – None Effect – If controls are not operating effectively and documentation is not maintained, EES may purchase goods or services that do not meet the requirements of their procurement policy, which is based on federal and state regulations. Cause – EES does not have a formal process in place for documenting and retaining documentation of vendor procurement considerations in accordance with their procurement policy. Repeat finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend EES reviews their procurement policy and ensures purchases are analyzed consistent with policy, and that the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the bids or quotes obtained as the basis for the contract price are documented and retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – EES will review their policies and procedures for reasonableness and alignment with the Funding Terms and Conditions for the CDE and CDSS. Once completed, EES will implement proper procedures and controls ensuring that appropriate documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and bids or other basis for the contract price happen in practice.
FINDING 2024-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance (See Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs for table included) Criteria – 2 CFR 200 section 318(i): Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition/Context – A sample of 10 vendors was selected and documentation of procurement history was requested. For 4 of the 10 vendors selected, EES had not retained or was unable to provide documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and the bids or other basis for the contract price. Questioned Costs – None Effect – If controls are not operating effectively and documentation is not maintained, EES may purchase goods or services that do not meet the requirements of their procurement policy, which is based on federal and state regulations. Cause – EES does not have a formal process in place for documenting and retaining documentation of vendor procurement considerations in accordance with their procurement policy. Repeat finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – We recommend EES reviews their procurement policy and ensures purchases are analyzed consistent with policy, and that the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the bids or quotes obtained as the basis for the contract price are documented and retained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – EES will review their policies and procedures for reasonableness and alignment with the Funding Terms and Conditions for the CDE and CDSS. Once completed, EES will implement proper procedures and controls ensuring that appropriate documentation of the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection and approval, and bids or other basis for the contract price happen in practice.