Audit 329458

FY End
2024-02-29
Total Expended
$20.82M
Findings
6
Programs
2
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-11-22

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
509765 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - G
509766 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - G
509767 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - G
1086207 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - G
1086208 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - G
1086209 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - G

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.600 Head Start $464,393 Yes 1
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $69,680 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
JM45S9BCNMK9 Kimberly Rhodes Auditee
3178033803 Cami S. Demaree, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule Expenditures of Federal Awards are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting. Condition: The Organization’s review of in-kind valuation is not operating as intended. Cause: The review process for in-kind does not include sufficient recomputing of in-kind values for volunteer time, verification of current market studies for in-kind space, or verification of current lease agreements. Effect: Though the Organization obtains periodic market valuations for leased space, the spreadsheets used to calculate the monthly in-kind values were not updated with the current market rates. In some cases, incorrect lease payments per the lease agreement were also incorrect. These miscalculations resulted in the value of in-kind space to be overstated by approximately $21,802. Additionally, we also found minor calculation errors when totaling and recording volunteer time. Recommendation: The Organization’s review process for valuing in-kind needs to be modified to require more extensive review of calculations.
Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting. Condition: The Organization’s review of in-kind valuation is not operating as intended. Cause: The review process for in-kind does not include sufficient recomputing of in-kind values for volunteer time, verification of current market studies for in-kind space, or verification of current lease agreements. Effect: Though the Organization obtains periodic market valuations for leased space, the spreadsheets used to calculate the monthly in-kind values were not updated with the current market rates. In some cases, incorrect lease payments per the lease agreement were also incorrect. These miscalculations resulted in the value of in-kind space to be overstated by approximately $21,802. Additionally, we also found minor calculation errors when totaling and recording volunteer time. Recommendation: The Organization’s review process for valuing in-kind needs to be modified to require more extensive review of calculations.
Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting. Condition: The Organization’s review of in-kind valuation is not operating as intended. Cause: The review process for in-kind does not include sufficient recomputing of in-kind values for volunteer time, verification of current market studies for in-kind space, or verification of current lease agreements. Effect: Though the Organization obtains periodic market valuations for leased space, the spreadsheets used to calculate the monthly in-kind values were not updated with the current market rates. In some cases, incorrect lease payments per the lease agreement were also incorrect. These miscalculations resulted in the value of in-kind space to be overstated by approximately $21,802. Additionally, we also found minor calculation errors when totaling and recording volunteer time. Recommendation: The Organization’s review process for valuing in-kind needs to be modified to require more extensive review of calculations.
Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting. Condition: The Organization’s review of in-kind valuation is not operating as intended. Cause: The review process for in-kind does not include sufficient recomputing of in-kind values for volunteer time, verification of current market studies for in-kind space, or verification of current lease agreements. Effect: Though the Organization obtains periodic market valuations for leased space, the spreadsheets used to calculate the monthly in-kind values were not updated with the current market rates. In some cases, incorrect lease payments per the lease agreement were also incorrect. These miscalculations resulted in the value of in-kind space to be overstated by approximately $21,802. Additionally, we also found minor calculation errors when totaling and recording volunteer time. Recommendation: The Organization’s review process for valuing in-kind needs to be modified to require more extensive review of calculations.
Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting. Condition: The Organization’s review of in-kind valuation is not operating as intended. Cause: The review process for in-kind does not include sufficient recomputing of in-kind values for volunteer time, verification of current market studies for in-kind space, or verification of current lease agreements. Effect: Though the Organization obtains periodic market valuations for leased space, the spreadsheets used to calculate the monthly in-kind values were not updated with the current market rates. In some cases, incorrect lease payments per the lease agreement were also incorrect. These miscalculations resulted in the value of in-kind space to be overstated by approximately $21,802. Additionally, we also found minor calculation errors when totaling and recording volunteer time. Recommendation: The Organization’s review process for valuing in-kind needs to be modified to require more extensive review of calculations.
Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting. Condition: The Organization’s review of in-kind valuation is not operating as intended. Cause: The review process for in-kind does not include sufficient recomputing of in-kind values for volunteer time, verification of current market studies for in-kind space, or verification of current lease agreements. Effect: Though the Organization obtains periodic market valuations for leased space, the spreadsheets used to calculate the monthly in-kind values were not updated with the current market rates. In some cases, incorrect lease payments per the lease agreement were also incorrect. These miscalculations resulted in the value of in-kind space to be overstated by approximately $21,802. Additionally, we also found minor calculation errors when totaling and recording volunteer time. Recommendation: The Organization’s review process for valuing in-kind needs to be modified to require more extensive review of calculations.