Audit 328639

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$16.99M
Findings
2
Programs
9
Organization: University of Saint Mary (KS)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-11-17

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
508180 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L
1084622 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
FTYLWMXBJ9H1 Nancybramlett Auditee
9137584349 Kieth McGovern Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of University of Saint Mary (the “University”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the University.
Title: Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
Title: Note 3: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The University has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Note 4: Federal Loan Programs Accounting Policies: Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The federal loan programs listed subsequently are administered directly by the University, and balances and transactions relating to these programs are included in the University’s consolidated financial statements. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year and loans made during the year are included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. The balance of loans outstanding at June 30, 2024, consists of Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.038 Federal Perkins Loans Program $147,087.

Finding Details

Reference Number: Finding #2024-001 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds #21.027 U.S. Department of Treasury Passed Through Kansas Department of Commerce Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting: The University’s grant agreement with Kansas Department of Commerce (KDOC) requires quarterly financial and narrative project reports detailing the use of the grant funds in such a way that are consistent with the Project as presented in the Grantee’s Grant Administration Plan and Budget. The quarterly reports are due on the last day of the month following the end of the period completed. These dates are July 31, 2023, October 31, 2023, January 31, 2024, and April 30, 2024. The reports should identify all grant funds remaining to be spent, the project progress and outcome of the project. Condition - The University did not submit reports to the KDOC at the required deadlines during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Questioned Costs - None noted. Context - Out of a population of four reports, we selected two reports and noted the two instances of noncompliance with the timely reporting requirement of the CSLFRF. Effect - The University was not in compliance with the reporting requirements of the grant agreement program. Cause - Management received conflicting information about the reporting requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding Recommendation - We recommend that management review this area and establish procedures to ensure required reports are completed timely and accurately. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management worked closely with the KDOC on the requirements of the quarterly submissions and was in frequent communication with them. However, management received conflicting guidance from the KDOC about the required submissions for the program. Due to the conflicting guidance, management stopped submitting reports and was waiting for further feedback. Management wanted to avoid submitting future reports that may have been potentially inaccurate or missing appropriate documentation. Management finally received final guidance at the beginning of September 2024 and will begin submitting reports on a timely basis.
Reference Number: Finding #2024-001 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds #21.027 U.S. Department of Treasury Passed Through Kansas Department of Commerce Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting: The University’s grant agreement with Kansas Department of Commerce (KDOC) requires quarterly financial and narrative project reports detailing the use of the grant funds in such a way that are consistent with the Project as presented in the Grantee’s Grant Administration Plan and Budget. The quarterly reports are due on the last day of the month following the end of the period completed. These dates are July 31, 2023, October 31, 2023, January 31, 2024, and April 30, 2024. The reports should identify all grant funds remaining to be spent, the project progress and outcome of the project. Condition - The University did not submit reports to the KDOC at the required deadlines during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Questioned Costs - None noted. Context - Out of a population of four reports, we selected two reports and noted the two instances of noncompliance with the timely reporting requirement of the CSLFRF. Effect - The University was not in compliance with the reporting requirements of the grant agreement program. Cause - Management received conflicting information about the reporting requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding Recommendation - We recommend that management review this area and establish procedures to ensure required reports are completed timely and accurately. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management worked closely with the KDOC on the requirements of the quarterly submissions and was in frequent communication with them. However, management received conflicting guidance from the KDOC about the required submissions for the program. Due to the conflicting guidance, management stopped submitting reports and was waiting for further feedback. Management wanted to avoid submitting future reports that may have been potentially inaccurate or missing appropriate documentation. Management finally received final guidance at the beginning of September 2024 and will begin submitting reports on a timely basis.