FAC Explorer

Audit 328476

FY End
2024-03-31
Total Expended
$4.60M
Findings
0
Programs
14
Organization: The Watershed Research & Training Center (CA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-11-14
Auditor: D H Scott & Company

Organization Exclusion Status:

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.701 Stewardship Agreements $785,984 - 0
10.664 Cooperative Forestry Assistance $219,531 - 0
10.674 Wood Utilization Assistance $113,265 - 0
15.228 Blm Fuels Management and Community Fire Assistance Program Activities $87,976 - 0
10.698 State & Private Forestry Cooperative Fire Assistance $77,851 Yes 0
15.532 Central Valley, Trinity River Division, Trinity River Fish and Wildlife Management $54,631 - 0
10.683 National Fish and Wildlife Foundation $53,656 - 0
15.554 Cooperative Watershed Management $35,737 - 0
10.699 Partnership Agreements $17,345 - 0
15.232 Joint Fire Science Program $8,021 - 0
15.631 Partners for Fish and Wildlife $6,207 - 0
10.665 Schools and Roads - Grants to States $4,862 - 0
10.902 Soil and Water Conservation $1,837 - 0
10.682 National Forest Foundation $569 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
DJMBE4BLFUC4 Rachel Evans Auditee
5306284206 Christine Link Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of Watershed Research & Training Center for the year ended March 31, 2024. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principals, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.