FAC Explorer

Audit 327628

FY End
2024-03-31
Total Expended
$4.14M
Findings
8
Programs
5
Organization: North Providence Housing Authority (RI)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-11-07
Auditor: Marcum LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
504875 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes E
504876 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes E
504877 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes N
504878 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes N
1081317 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes E
1081318 2024-001 Significant Deficiency Yes E
1081319 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes N
1081320 2024-002 Material Weakness Yes N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $2.52M Yes 2
14.850 Public Housing Operating Fund $590,018 - 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $533,662 - 0
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $416,888 Yes 2
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $74,718 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
H3UCHYNZ4K63 Marilee Arsenault Auditee
4017280930 Michael Guyder Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal grant activity of North Providence Housing Authority, under programs of the federal government for the year ended March 31, 2024. The information in the schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirement, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of North Providence Housing Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of North Providence Housing Authority. NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. For cost-reimbursement awards, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. For performance-based awards, expenditures reported represent amounts earned. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The North Providence Housing Authority has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-001
024-001 – ELIGIBILITY: RENT CALCULATION Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 / 14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA For both family income examinations and reexamination, obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of (1) reported family annual income (2) the value of assets (3) expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR Section 982.516). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant’s rent payment using the documentation from third-party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, 982.516). CONDITION As a result of procedures, we identified ten instances of missing income verification. CAUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT Redetermination of tenant’s rent and the housing assistance payment was not performed in accordance with HUD regulations. As a result, tenants may have paid more or less in rent than they should have paid. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 40 from a population of 276. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING See finding 2023-001 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained.
Finding 2024-001
024-001 – ELIGIBILITY: RENT CALCULATION Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 / 14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA For both family income examinations and reexamination, obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of (1) reported family annual income (2) the value of assets (3) expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR Section 982.516). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant’s rent payment using the documentation from third-party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, 982.516). CONDITION As a result of procedures, we identified ten instances of missing income verification. CAUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT Redetermination of tenant’s rent and the housing assistance payment was not performed in accordance with HUD regulations. As a result, tenants may have paid more or less in rent than they should have paid. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 40 from a population of 276. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING See finding 2023-001 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained.
Finding 2024-002
024-002 – SPECIAL TESTS & PROVISIONS: RENT REASONABLENESS Material Weakness/Material Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 / 14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA The PHA may not approve a lease until the PHA determines that the initial rent to an owner is a reasonable rent. (2) The PHA must redetermine the reasonable rent: (i) Before any increase in the rent to an owner; (ii) If there is a 10 percent decrease in the published FMR in effect 60 days before the contract anniversary (for the unit size rented by the family) as compared with the FMR in effect 1 year before the contract anniversary. (iii) If directed by HUD. The PHA may also redetermine the reasonable rent at any other time. At all times during the assisted tenancy, the rent to owner may not exceed the reasonable rent as most recently determined or redetermined by the PHA. (24 CFR 982.507) CONDITION We identified ten instances in which the Authority was required to perform an assessment to determine if the rent requested by the landlord is reasonable. In all instances, the Authority did not perform this rent reasonableness assessment properly. AUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT The Authority cannot ensure that HAP payments to landlords were reasonable. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 40 from a population of 276. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING See finding 2023-002 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-002
024-002 – SPECIAL TESTS & PROVISIONS: RENT REASONABLENESS Material Weakness/Material Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 / 14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA The PHA may not approve a lease until the PHA determines that the initial rent to an owner is a reasonable rent. (2) The PHA must redetermine the reasonable rent: (i) Before any increase in the rent to an owner; (ii) If there is a 10 percent decrease in the published FMR in effect 60 days before the contract anniversary (for the unit size rented by the family) as compared with the FMR in effect 1 year before the contract anniversary. (iii) If directed by HUD. The PHA may also redetermine the reasonable rent at any other time. At all times during the assisted tenancy, the rent to owner may not exceed the reasonable rent as most recently determined or redetermined by the PHA. (24 CFR 982.507) CONDITION We identified ten instances in which the Authority was required to perform an assessment to determine if the rent requested by the landlord is reasonable. In all instances, the Authority did not perform this rent reasonableness assessment properly. AUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT The Authority cannot ensure that HAP payments to landlords were reasonable. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 40 from a population of 276. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING See finding 2023-002 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-001
024-001 – ELIGIBILITY: RENT CALCULATION Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 / 14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA For both family income examinations and reexamination, obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of (1) reported family annual income (2) the value of assets (3) expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR Section 982.516). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant’s rent payment using the documentation from third-party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, 982.516). CONDITION As a result of procedures, we identified ten instances of missing income verification. CAUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT Redetermination of tenant’s rent and the housing assistance payment was not performed in accordance with HUD regulations. As a result, tenants may have paid more or less in rent than they should have paid. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 40 from a population of 276. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING See finding 2023-001 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained.
Finding 2024-001
024-001 – ELIGIBILITY: RENT CALCULATION Other Matter/Significant Deficiency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 / 14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA For both family income examinations and reexamination, obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of (1) reported family annual income (2) the value of assets (3) expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR Section 982.516). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant’s rent payment using the documentation from third-party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, 982.516). CONDITION As a result of procedures, we identified ten instances of missing income verification. CAUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT Redetermination of tenant’s rent and the housing assistance payment was not performed in accordance with HUD regulations. As a result, tenants may have paid more or less in rent than they should have paid. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 40 from a population of 276. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING See finding 2023-001 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained.
Finding 2024-002
024-002 – SPECIAL TESTS & PROVISIONS: RENT REASONABLENESS Material Weakness/Material Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 / 14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA The PHA may not approve a lease until the PHA determines that the initial rent to an owner is a reasonable rent. (2) The PHA must redetermine the reasonable rent: (i) Before any increase in the rent to an owner; (ii) If there is a 10 percent decrease in the published FMR in effect 60 days before the contract anniversary (for the unit size rented by the family) as compared with the FMR in effect 1 year before the contract anniversary. (iii) If directed by HUD. The PHA may also redetermine the reasonable rent at any other time. At all times during the assisted tenancy, the rent to owner may not exceed the reasonable rent as most recently determined or redetermined by the PHA. (24 CFR 982.507) CONDITION We identified ten instances in which the Authority was required to perform an assessment to determine if the rent requested by the landlord is reasonable. In all instances, the Authority did not perform this rent reasonableness assessment properly. AUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT The Authority cannot ensure that HAP payments to landlords were reasonable. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 40 from a population of 276. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING See finding 2023-002 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2024-002
024-002 – SPECIAL TESTS & PROVISIONS: RENT REASONABLENESS Material Weakness/Material Noncompliance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CFDA #: 14.871 / 14.879 – Housing Voucher Cluster CRITERIA The PHA may not approve a lease until the PHA determines that the initial rent to an owner is a reasonable rent. (2) The PHA must redetermine the reasonable rent: (i) Before any increase in the rent to an owner; (ii) If there is a 10 percent decrease in the published FMR in effect 60 days before the contract anniversary (for the unit size rented by the family) as compared with the FMR in effect 1 year before the contract anniversary. (iii) If directed by HUD. The PHA may also redetermine the reasonable rent at any other time. At all times during the assisted tenancy, the rent to owner may not exceed the reasonable rent as most recently determined or redetermined by the PHA. (24 CFR 982.507) CONDITION We identified ten instances in which the Authority was required to perform an assessment to determine if the rent requested by the landlord is reasonable. In all instances, the Authority did not perform this rent reasonableness assessment properly. AUSE The Authority’s system of internal control over the participant recertification process was not sufficient to meet the requirements established by HUD. EFFECT The Authority cannot ensure that HAP payments to landlords were reasonable. QUESTIONED COSTS None identified. CONTEXT We selected a sample of 40 from a population of 276. This was not a statistically valid sample. REPEAT FINDING See finding 2023-002 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the Authority develop and implement a recertification checklist to accompany the tenant file to ensure all required documentation is obtained. AUDITEE’S RESPONSE AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION See Corrective Action Plan.