Audit 327370

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$953,093
Findings
2
Programs
6
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-11-05

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
504751 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes EN
1081193 2024-003 Material Weakness Yes EN

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.157 Supportive Housing for the Elderly $633,047 Yes 1
10.415 Rural Rental Housing Loans $194,555 - 0
10.447 The Rural Development (rd) Multi-Family Housing Revitalization Demonstration Program (mpr) $63,571 - 0
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $28,715 - 0
10.427 Rural Rental Assistance Payments $23,618 - 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $9,587 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LSPHN5PGDJG3 Julie Gockley Auditee
3088825321 Jeffrey J Wiens Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Outstanding Loans Accounting Policies: 1. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Housing Authority of the City of Imperial, Nebraska and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: 3. The entity did not elect to use the 10% de minimus cost rate as covered in § 200.414 Indirect (F&A) costs. 2. The outstanding balance of the Section 202 Capital Advance mortgage was $615,700 at June 30, 2024. The outstanding balance of the Multi-Family Housing Preservation and Revitalization Restructuring Program Grant Agreement mortgage at June 30, 2024 was $62,364.66. The outstanding balance of the Rural Rental Housing Loan at June 30, 2024 was $188,781.68.

Finding Details

Finding 2024-003: Internal Control Structure Section 202 Capital Advance, 14.157 Material Weakness - Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions Repeat Finding – Finding 2023-003 Criteria: The Authority is responsible for establishing an effective internal control process to ensure the Authority complies with the requirements governing the Section 202 Capital Advance program. Condition: The Authority only had one administrative employee which makes it difficult for the Authority to have controls beyond the Authority Manager’s knowledge. As a result, we noted the Authority had a lack of segregation of duties related to all applicable compliance requirements. Cause: The Authority has limited resources and one staff. Effect or Potential Effect: The control deficiencies are deficiencies that result in more than a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with program requirements could occur and not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: As noted above, the Authority has limited resources and additional controls are not financially feasible in the hiring of additional staff. In addition, the Board of Commissioners is considered a governing Board and the Board performing management or day-to-day activities is not recommended based on our previous experience and is not intended to be a solution to this situation. The Authority is a small entity and the lack of segregation of duties is common among entities with minimal employees and should be recognized as such. However, it is not our intent to establish internal controls as the Authority’s Board should make the final determination in the cost versus benefit. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding but can not reasonably adopt internal control procedures to correct the material weakness.
Finding 2024-003: Internal Control Structure Section 202 Capital Advance, 14.157 Material Weakness - Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions Repeat Finding – Finding 2023-003 Criteria: The Authority is responsible for establishing an effective internal control process to ensure the Authority complies with the requirements governing the Section 202 Capital Advance program. Condition: The Authority only had one administrative employee which makes it difficult for the Authority to have controls beyond the Authority Manager’s knowledge. As a result, we noted the Authority had a lack of segregation of duties related to all applicable compliance requirements. Cause: The Authority has limited resources and one staff. Effect or Potential Effect: The control deficiencies are deficiencies that result in more than a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with program requirements could occur and not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: As noted above, the Authority has limited resources and additional controls are not financially feasible in the hiring of additional staff. In addition, the Board of Commissioners is considered a governing Board and the Board performing management or day-to-day activities is not recommended based on our previous experience and is not intended to be a solution to this situation. The Authority is a small entity and the lack of segregation of duties is common among entities with minimal employees and should be recognized as such. However, it is not our intent to establish internal controls as the Authority’s Board should make the final determination in the cost versus benefit. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding but can not reasonably adopt internal control procedures to correct the material weakness.