Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.
Information on the federal program – Research and Development cluster, various assistance listing numbers Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement Condition – The University’s procurement policies were not followed by the Office of Research and Innovation for consulting services or contractors paid under external grants. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – The Office of Research and Innovation was operating under the understanding that they were exempt from following the University’s standard procurement policies. The exemption was communicated by the University’s former General Counsel. Effect – Expenditures within the Research and Development cluster that were above the $10,000 threshold for procurement procedures, as set by the University’s procurement policies, did not go through the appropriate quotation or competitive bidding process. Cause – The exemption from the University’s former General Counsel should not have been granted to the Office of Research and Innovation as it directly violates the University’s policies, which in turn violates the Uniform Guidance standards for procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – No Recommendation – We recommend the Office of Research and Innovation follow the University’s current procurement policies or develop procurement practices under Federal awards that are in compliance with Uniform Guidance procurement standards.