Audit 326899

FY End
2024-03-31
Total Expended
$36.63M
Findings
6
Programs
18
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-10-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
504334 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
504335 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
504336 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1080776 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1080777 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1080778 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
XPMYYG76MMD5 Grace Almaguer Auditee
5098656175 Kyla Delgado Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Clinic has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Clinic has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Clinic under programs of the federal government for the year ended March 31, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Clinic, it is not intended and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Clinic.
Title: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Clinic has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Clinic has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Clinic has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS TOTALS - EXPENDITURES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Clinic has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Clinic has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The schedules are presented by agency. The table below shows the overall combined totals that are not shown in the individual schedules.
Title: ALN 93.530 Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Clinic has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Clinic has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Clinic received and expended funds from the Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education Payments Program. The amount of funds received and expended during the period is exempt from audit under the Uniform Guidance requirements per the program description.

Finding Details

Criteria: Under the compliance requirement for Special Tests and Provisions for ALN 93.224/93.527, “health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay”. In one identified instance, an incorrect sliding fee discount was applied. Condition: CLA identified one instance of the key control not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirements. Context: CLA identified one instance out of forty total tested of which the key control was not met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirement. Cause: The sliding fee application effective for the transaction tested indicated the patient qualified for a 75% sliding fee discount, however, a nominal fee of $15 was applied to the patient's charges. Effect: Incorrect sliding fee discount was applied to the transaction tested. Recommendation: We recommend the Clinic implement a process for ensuring the level of sliding fee discount determined is the discount applied to the patient’s charge. Views of the Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action Plan: A sliding fee verification checklist has been developed for use at all sites. The checklist will be completed by a staff member who did not assist the patient with their sliding fee application. The checklist requires the reviewer to verify each data point of the application and compare the entries between the sliding fee form and the information entered in the electronic health record. The checklist will be completed electronically and stored in patient’s electronic health record account and is available for review as needed. The verification checklist will be moved into production on August 23, 2024, and site supervisors will train staff on the new process.
Criteria: Under the compliance requirement for Special Tests and Provisions for ALN 93.224/93.527, “health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay”. In one identified instance, an incorrect sliding fee discount was applied. Condition: CLA identified one instance of the key control not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirements. Context: CLA identified one instance out of forty total tested of which the key control was not met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirement. Cause: The sliding fee application effective for the transaction tested indicated the patient qualified for a 75% sliding fee discount, however, a nominal fee of $15 was applied to the patient's charges. Effect: Incorrect sliding fee discount was applied to the transaction tested. Recommendation: We recommend the Clinic implement a process for ensuring the level of sliding fee discount determined is the discount applied to the patient’s charge. Views of the Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action Plan: A sliding fee verification checklist has been developed for use at all sites. The checklist will be completed by a staff member who did not assist the patient with their sliding fee application. The checklist requires the reviewer to verify each data point of the application and compare the entries between the sliding fee form and the information entered in the electronic health record. The checklist will be completed electronically and stored in patient’s electronic health record account and is available for review as needed. The verification checklist will be moved into production on August 23, 2024, and site supervisors will train staff on the new process.
Criteria: Under the compliance requirement for Special Tests and Provisions for ALN 93.224/93.527, “health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay”. In one identified instance, an incorrect sliding fee discount was applied. Condition: CLA identified one instance of the key control not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirements. Context: CLA identified one instance out of forty total tested of which the key control was not met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirement. Cause: The sliding fee application effective for the transaction tested indicated the patient qualified for a 75% sliding fee discount, however, a nominal fee of $15 was applied to the patient's charges. Effect: Incorrect sliding fee discount was applied to the transaction tested. Recommendation: We recommend the Clinic implement a process for ensuring the level of sliding fee discount determined is the discount applied to the patient’s charge. Views of the Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action Plan: A sliding fee verification checklist has been developed for use at all sites. The checklist will be completed by a staff member who did not assist the patient with their sliding fee application. The checklist requires the reviewer to verify each data point of the application and compare the entries between the sliding fee form and the information entered in the electronic health record. The checklist will be completed electronically and stored in patient’s electronic health record account and is available for review as needed. The verification checklist will be moved into production on August 23, 2024, and site supervisors will train staff on the new process.
Criteria: Under the compliance requirement for Special Tests and Provisions for ALN 93.224/93.527, “health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay”. In one identified instance, an incorrect sliding fee discount was applied. Condition: CLA identified one instance of the key control not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirements. Context: CLA identified one instance out of forty total tested of which the key control was not met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirement. Cause: The sliding fee application effective for the transaction tested indicated the patient qualified for a 75% sliding fee discount, however, a nominal fee of $15 was applied to the patient's charges. Effect: Incorrect sliding fee discount was applied to the transaction tested. Recommendation: We recommend the Clinic implement a process for ensuring the level of sliding fee discount determined is the discount applied to the patient’s charge. Views of the Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action Plan: A sliding fee verification checklist has been developed for use at all sites. The checklist will be completed by a staff member who did not assist the patient with their sliding fee application. The checklist requires the reviewer to verify each data point of the application and compare the entries between the sliding fee form and the information entered in the electronic health record. The checklist will be completed electronically and stored in patient’s electronic health record account and is available for review as needed. The verification checklist will be moved into production on August 23, 2024, and site supervisors will train staff on the new process.
Criteria: Under the compliance requirement for Special Tests and Provisions for ALN 93.224/93.527, “health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay”. In one identified instance, an incorrect sliding fee discount was applied. Condition: CLA identified one instance of the key control not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirements. Context: CLA identified one instance out of forty total tested of which the key control was not met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirement. Cause: The sliding fee application effective for the transaction tested indicated the patient qualified for a 75% sliding fee discount, however, a nominal fee of $15 was applied to the patient's charges. Effect: Incorrect sliding fee discount was applied to the transaction tested. Recommendation: We recommend the Clinic implement a process for ensuring the level of sliding fee discount determined is the discount applied to the patient’s charge. Views of the Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action Plan: A sliding fee verification checklist has been developed for use at all sites. The checklist will be completed by a staff member who did not assist the patient with their sliding fee application. The checklist requires the reviewer to verify each data point of the application and compare the entries between the sliding fee form and the information entered in the electronic health record. The checklist will be completed electronically and stored in patient’s electronic health record account and is available for review as needed. The verification checklist will be moved into production on August 23, 2024, and site supervisors will train staff on the new process.
Criteria: Under the compliance requirement for Special Tests and Provisions for ALN 93.224/93.527, “health centers must prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay”. In one identified instance, an incorrect sliding fee discount was applied. Condition: CLA identified one instance of the key control not being met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirements. Context: CLA identified one instance out of forty total tested of which the key control was not met while performing testing over the special tests and provisions compliance requirement. Cause: The sliding fee application effective for the transaction tested indicated the patient qualified for a 75% sliding fee discount, however, a nominal fee of $15 was applied to the patient's charges. Effect: Incorrect sliding fee discount was applied to the transaction tested. Recommendation: We recommend the Clinic implement a process for ensuring the level of sliding fee discount determined is the discount applied to the patient’s charge. Views of the Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action Plan: A sliding fee verification checklist has been developed for use at all sites. The checklist will be completed by a staff member who did not assist the patient with their sliding fee application. The checklist requires the reviewer to verify each data point of the application and compare the entries between the sliding fee form and the information entered in the electronic health record. The checklist will be completed electronically and stored in patient’s electronic health record account and is available for review as needed. The verification checklist will be moved into production on August 23, 2024, and site supervisors will train staff on the new process.