Audit 326149

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$1.08M
Findings
0
Programs
2
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-10-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $859,269 Yes 0
14.103 Flexible Subsidy Assistance Progrm $222,176 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
EWVXJFVKKJ73 Anthony Kerr Auditee
9734773496 Frank L. Glien, Jr. Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1. General Information Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance present the activities in all the federal and state programs of Clinton Hill Community Apartments. All financial assistance received directly from federal and state agencies as well as financial assistance passed through other governmental agencies are included in the schedules De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Auditee did not use the deminimis cost rate. Auditee used the direct allocation method The accompanying Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance present the activities in all the federal and state programs of Clinton Hill Community Apartments. All financial assistance received directly from federal and state agencies as well as financial assistance passed through other governmental agencies are included in the schedules.
Title: Note 2. Basis of Accounting Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance present the activities in all the federal and state programs of Clinton Hill Community Apartments. All financial assistance received directly from federal and state agencies as well as financial assistance passed through other governmental agencies are included in the schedules De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Auditee did not use the deminimis cost rate. Auditee used the direct allocation method The accompanying schedules are presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The amounts reported in these schedules as expenditures may differ from certain financial reports submitted to federal and state funding agencies due to those reports being submitted on a cash or modified accrual basis of accounting.
Title: Note 3. Non-Cash Federal Assistance Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance present the activities in all the federal and state programs of Clinton Hill Community Apartments. All financial assistance received directly from federal and state agencies as well as financial assistance passed through other governmental agencies are included in the schedules De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Auditee did not use the deminimis cost rate. Auditee used the direct allocation method The Project did not provide any loan or loan guarantees in the year ended December 31, 2023.
Title: Note 4. Sub-Recipients Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance present the activities in all the federal and state programs of Clinton Hill Community Apartments. All financial assistance received directly from federal and state agencies as well as financial assistance passed through other governmental agencies are included in the schedules De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Auditee did not use the deminimis cost rate. Auditee used the direct allocation method Of the federal and state expenditures presented in this schedule, the Project did not provide federal or state awards to sub-recipients.
Title: Note 5. Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance present the activities in all the federal and state programs of Clinton Hill Community Apartments. All financial assistance received directly from federal and state agencies as well as financial assistance passed through other governmental agencies are included in the schedules De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Auditee did not use the deminimis cost rate. Auditee used the direct allocation method The Project has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.