Audit 325003

FY End
2022-04-30
Total Expended
$8.82M
Findings
12
Programs
4
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-10-16
Auditor: Armanino

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
503029 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
503030 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
503031 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
503032 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
503033 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
503034 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
1079471 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
1079472 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
1079473 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
1079474 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
1079475 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I
1079476 2022-007 Significant Deficiency - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
L3FBDNB6TPM7 Kevin Matthews Auditee
2134080508 Renee Ordeneaux Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of Weingart Center Association (a California nonprofit corporation) and Subsidiaries (the "Organization") under programs of the federal government for the year ended April 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or limited as to reimbursement. Passthrough entity identifying numbers are presented where available and applicable. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.
Emergency Shelter Program, 14.231 Finding number: 2022-007 Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.320, an organization must have and use documented procurement procedures. This includes a requirement to maintain the procurement documents. Condition: Documentation of the procurement process was unavailable for certain vendors. Cause: Management indicated that turnover in the position previously responsible for procurement resulted in an inability to locate full documentation of the procurement process. This is not a repeat finding. Effect or potential effect: Management was unable to produce documentation of the exact process used to choose two recently selected vendors. Recommendation: Management should revise its documentation system to allow for centralized and accessible storage of support for its vendor procurement process. Views of responsible officials: In one of the procurement cases the Organization chose Chrysalis, many years prior, a nationally known non-profit partner which has specific expertise with the population we serve and are unique in their expertise. The second was a security firm which was one of three firms the Organization could have chosen for the assignment. The Organization had previously used the other two and were unhappy with their service. Going forward Management will document such decisions in a more detailed manner.