Audit 324653

FY End
2024-06-30
Total Expended
$6.06M
Findings
10
Programs
14
Organization: Trustees of Grinnell College (IA)
Year: 2024 Accepted: 2024-10-14

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
502653 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
502654 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
502655 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
502656 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
502657 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1079095 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1079096 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1079097 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1079098 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N
1079099 2024-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $2.53M Yes 1
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $1.78M Yes 1
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program $639,916 Yes 1
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $230,720 Yes 1
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $200,000 Yes 1
47.070 Computer and Information Science and Engineering $167,116 - 0
47.049 Mathematical and Physical Sciences $153,193 - 0
45.149 Promotion of the Humanities_division of Preservation and Access $79,784 - 0
10.890 Rural Development Cooperative Agreement Program $65,962 - 0
47.050 Geosciences $39,774 - 0
47.074 Biological Sciences $28,320 - 0
47.076 Education and Human Resources $24,005 - 0
45.169 Promotion of the Humanities_office of Digital Humanities $17,507 - 0
47.083 Integrative Activities $11,382 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
NRFXPGZU88G2 Nancy Combs Auditee
6412694245 Chad Lassen, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The College has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the College under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the College, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the College.
Title: STUDENT FINANCIAL AID INSTITUTIONAL AND PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY METRICS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The College has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The College is in compliance with the following institutional and program eligibility requirements under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and Federal regulations under 34 CFR 668.23: • Correspondence courses the institution offers under 34 CFR 600.7(b) and (g); • Regular students that enroll in correspondence courses under 34 CFR 600.7(b) and (g); • Institution’s regular students that are incarcerated under 34 CFR 600.7(c) and (g); • Completion rates for confined or incarcerated individuals enrolled in non-degree programs at nonprofit institutions under 34 CFR 600.7(c)(3)(ii) and (g); • Institution’s regular students that lack a high school diploma or its equivalent under 34 CFR 600.7(d) and (g); • Completion rates for short-term programs under 34 CFR 668.8(f) and (g); • Placement rates for short-term programs under https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/subtitle-B/chapter-VI/part-668/subpart-A/section-668.8 34 CFR 668.8(e)(2).
Title: PERKINS LOAN PROGRAMS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The College has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The federal student loan programs listed subsequently are administered directly by the College, and balances and transactions relating to these programs are included in the College’s basic consolidated financial statements. During the year, there were no loans advanced under this program. The balance of loans outstanding at June 30, 2024 was $477,504.

Finding Details

Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to NSLDS through an enrollment roster file. The school is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. Changes to a students' status are required to be reported within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change, or with the next scheduled transmission of statuses if the scheduled transmission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 2 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the College's records. Furthermore, we noted 2 out of the 40 students tested where the student was not reported in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: During our testing, it was noted the University’s current process in place did not ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the College's records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student’s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus level is aligning with the College as well as the status changes are reported timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to NSLDS through an enrollment roster file. The school is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. Changes to a students' status are required to be reported within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change, or with the next scheduled transmission of statuses if the scheduled transmission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 2 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the College's records. Furthermore, we noted 2 out of the 40 students tested where the student was not reported in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: During our testing, it was noted the University’s current process in place did not ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the College's records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student’s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus level is aligning with the College as well as the status changes are reported timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to NSLDS through an enrollment roster file. The school is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. Changes to a students' status are required to be reported within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change, or with the next scheduled transmission of statuses if the scheduled transmission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 2 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the College's records. Furthermore, we noted 2 out of the 40 students tested where the student was not reported in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: During our testing, it was noted the University’s current process in place did not ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the College's records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student’s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus level is aligning with the College as well as the status changes are reported timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to NSLDS through an enrollment roster file. The school is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. Changes to a students' status are required to be reported within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change, or with the next scheduled transmission of statuses if the scheduled transmission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 2 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the College's records. Furthermore, we noted 2 out of the 40 students tested where the student was not reported in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: During our testing, it was noted the University’s current process in place did not ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the College's records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student’s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus level is aligning with the College as well as the status changes are reported timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to NSLDS through an enrollment roster file. The school is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. Changes to a students' status are required to be reported within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change, or with the next scheduled transmission of statuses if the scheduled transmission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 2 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the College's records. Furthermore, we noted 2 out of the 40 students tested where the student was not reported in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: During our testing, it was noted the University’s current process in place did not ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the College's records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student’s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus level is aligning with the College as well as the status changes are reported timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to NSLDS through an enrollment roster file. The school is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. Changes to a students' status are required to be reported within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change, or with the next scheduled transmission of statuses if the scheduled transmission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 2 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the College's records. Furthermore, we noted 2 out of the 40 students tested where the student was not reported in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: During our testing, it was noted the University’s current process in place did not ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the College's records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student’s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus level is aligning with the College as well as the status changes are reported timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to NSLDS through an enrollment roster file. The school is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. Changes to a students' status are required to be reported within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change, or with the next scheduled transmission of statuses if the scheduled transmission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 2 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the College's records. Furthermore, we noted 2 out of the 40 students tested where the student was not reported in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: During our testing, it was noted the University’s current process in place did not ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the College's records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student’s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus level is aligning with the College as well as the status changes are reported timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to NSLDS through an enrollment roster file. The school is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. Changes to a students' status are required to be reported within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change, or with the next scheduled transmission of statuses if the scheduled transmission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 2 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the College's records. Furthermore, we noted 2 out of the 40 students tested where the student was not reported in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: During our testing, it was noted the University’s current process in place did not ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the College's records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student’s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus level is aligning with the College as well as the status changes are reported timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to NSLDS through an enrollment roster file. The school is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. Changes to a students' status are required to be reported within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change, or with the next scheduled transmission of statuses if the scheduled transmission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 2 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the College's records. Furthermore, we noted 2 out of the 40 students tested where the student was not reported in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: During our testing, it was noted the University’s current process in place did not ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the College's records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student’s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus level is aligning with the College as well as the status changes are reported timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other matter Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309(b), states schools must have some arrangement to report student enrollment data to NSLDS through an enrollment roster file. The school is required to report changes in the student’s enrollment status, the effective date of the status, and an anticipated completion date as well as program enrollment effective date. Changes to a students' status are required to be reported within 30 days of becoming aware of the status change, or with the next scheduled transmission of statuses if the scheduled transmission is within 60 days. Condition: During our testing, we noted for 2 out of the 40 students tested, the enrollment effective date did not match the College's records. Furthermore, we noted 2 out of the 40 students tested where the student was not reported in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: During our testing, it was noted the University’s current process in place did not ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the effective dates reported matched the College's records as well as that these changes were reported timely. Effect: The enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS is used to determine when the student’s grace period should begin. By not reporting an incorrect effective date, the grace period begin date for the student will be incorrect. In addition, the College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College reevaluate its procedures and review policies surrounding reporting status changes to NSLDS to put a process in place to ensure the enrollment effective date reported to NSLDS on the campus level is aligning with the College as well as the status changes are reported timely. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.