Audit 323789

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$901,224
Findings
6
Programs
10
Organization: Friendship Academy of the Arts (MN)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-10-03

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
501712 2023-007 Material Weakness - B
501713 2023-007 Material Weakness - B
501714 2023-007 Material Weakness Yes B
1078154 2023-007 Material Weakness - B
1078155 2023-007 Material Weakness - B
1078156 2023-007 Material Weakness Yes B

Contacts

Name Title Type
NAP6FSJDU4B4 Carr Kpanyor Auditee
6128796703 Christopher Knopik Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 Accounting Policies: The expenditures on this schedule are on the modified accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 1 to the financial statements of the School. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: N/A The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents the activity of federal award programs expended by Friendship Academy of the Arts Charter School No. 4079.

Finding Details

Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, & 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425V210045 Awarded fiscal year 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): S425D210045 Award Period: 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: The School should have an internal control over each major compliance area, including allowability, to ensure all payments are allowable for the grant to which they are coded. Condition: It was noted that manual checks, wire transactions, and debit card purchases did not have documentation of the transactions being reviewed and approved. It was noted during payroll testing that none of the disbursements tested had documentation of reviewing the payment for allowability or amount. There was also no documentation of review for time and effort documentation. There were also payments to individuals for incorrect amounts that were charged to the grant. Questioned costs: $1,254.44 Context: Of the eight cash disbursements tested two of them did not have documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested, none of them had documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested five of them had discrepancies between the amount paid to the individual and their approved contract. In some instances, there was an overpayment and in others an under-payment which caused some additional costs to be coded to the federal expenditures for this program. Cause: These types of payments were not reviewed and approved at a detailed level during the year, or if they were, that review was not formally documented. Effect: The School does not have any documentation of someone reviewing and approving the expenditures charged to the federal program, and in some situations paid out incorrect amounts to individuals coded to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that all purchases and payroll are reviewed and approved, with part of that procedure being to review that the expenditures are allowable for the grant to which they are being recorded, and that time and effort are properly documented and reviewed. This review and approval should be documented so it is clear who reviewed it and when. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, & 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425V210045 Awarded fiscal year 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): S425D210045 Award Period: 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: The School should have an internal control over each major compliance area, including allowability, to ensure all payments are allowable for the grant to which they are coded. Condition: It was noted that manual checks, wire transactions, and debit card purchases did not have documentation of the transactions being reviewed and approved. It was noted during payroll testing that none of the disbursements tested had documentation of reviewing the payment for allowability or amount. There was also no documentation of review for time and effort documentation. There were also payments to individuals for incorrect amounts that were charged to the grant. Questioned costs: $1,254.44 Context: Of the eight cash disbursements tested two of them did not have documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested, none of them had documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested five of them had discrepancies between the amount paid to the individual and their approved contract. In some instances, there was an overpayment and in others an under-payment which caused some additional costs to be coded to the federal expenditures for this program. Cause: These types of payments were not reviewed and approved at a detailed level during the year, or if they were, that review was not formally documented. Effect: The School does not have any documentation of someone reviewing and approving the expenditures charged to the federal program, and in some situations paid out incorrect amounts to individuals coded to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that all purchases and payroll are reviewed and approved, with part of that procedure being to review that the expenditures are allowable for the grant to which they are being recorded, and that time and effort are properly documented and reviewed. This review and approval should be documented so it is clear who reviewed it and when. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, & 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425V210045 Awarded fiscal year 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): S425D210045 Award Period: 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: The School should have an internal control over each major compliance area, including allowability, to ensure all payments are allowable for the grant to which they are coded. Condition: It was noted that manual checks, wire transactions, and debit card purchases did not have documentation of the transactions being reviewed and approved. It was noted during payroll testing that none of the disbursements tested had documentation of reviewing the payment for allowability or amount. There was also no documentation of review for time and effort documentation. There were also payments to individuals for incorrect amounts that were charged to the grant. Questioned costs: $1,254.44 Context: Of the eight cash disbursements tested two of them did not have documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested, none of them had documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested five of them had discrepancies between the amount paid to the individual and their approved contract. In some instances, there was an overpayment and in others an under-payment which caused some additional costs to be coded to the federal expenditures for this program. Cause: These types of payments were not reviewed and approved at a detailed level during the year, or if they were, that review was not formally documented. Effect: The School does not have any documentation of someone reviewing and approving the expenditures charged to the federal program, and in some situations paid out incorrect amounts to individuals coded to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that all purchases and payroll are reviewed and approved, with part of that procedure being to review that the expenditures are allowable for the grant to which they are being recorded, and that time and effort are properly documented and reviewed. This review and approval should be documented so it is clear who reviewed it and when. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, & 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425V210045 Awarded fiscal year 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): S425D210045 Award Period: 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: The School should have an internal control over each major compliance area, including allowability, to ensure all payments are allowable for the grant to which they are coded. Condition: It was noted that manual checks, wire transactions, and debit card purchases did not have documentation of the transactions being reviewed and approved. It was noted during payroll testing that none of the disbursements tested had documentation of reviewing the payment for allowability or amount. There was also no documentation of review for time and effort documentation. There were also payments to individuals for incorrect amounts that were charged to the grant. Questioned costs: $1,254.44 Context: Of the eight cash disbursements tested two of them did not have documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested, none of them had documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested five of them had discrepancies between the amount paid to the individual and their approved contract. In some instances, there was an overpayment and in others an under-payment which caused some additional costs to be coded to the federal expenditures for this program. Cause: These types of payments were not reviewed and approved at a detailed level during the year, or if they were, that review was not formally documented. Effect: The School does not have any documentation of someone reviewing and approving the expenditures charged to the federal program, and in some situations paid out incorrect amounts to individuals coded to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that all purchases and payroll are reviewed and approved, with part of that procedure being to review that the expenditures are allowable for the grant to which they are being recorded, and that time and effort are properly documented and reviewed. This review and approval should be documented so it is clear who reviewed it and when. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, & 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425V210045 Awarded fiscal year 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): S425D210045 Award Period: 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: The School should have an internal control over each major compliance area, including allowability, to ensure all payments are allowable for the grant to which they are coded. Condition: It was noted that manual checks, wire transactions, and debit card purchases did not have documentation of the transactions being reviewed and approved. It was noted during payroll testing that none of the disbursements tested had documentation of reviewing the payment for allowability or amount. There was also no documentation of review for time and effort documentation. There were also payments to individuals for incorrect amounts that were charged to the grant. Questioned costs: $1,254.44 Context: Of the eight cash disbursements tested two of them did not have documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested, none of them had documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested five of them had discrepancies between the amount paid to the individual and their approved contract. In some instances, there was an overpayment and in others an under-payment which caused some additional costs to be coded to the federal expenditures for this program. Cause: These types of payments were not reviewed and approved at a detailed level during the year, or if they were, that review was not formally documented. Effect: The School does not have any documentation of someone reviewing and approving the expenditures charged to the federal program, and in some situations paid out incorrect amounts to individuals coded to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that all purchases and payroll are reviewed and approved, with part of that procedure being to review that the expenditures are allowable for the grant to which they are being recorded, and that time and effort are properly documented and reviewed. This review and approval should be documented so it is clear who reviewed it and when. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, & 84.425U Federal Award Identification Number and Year: S425V210045 Awarded fiscal year 2023 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): S425D210045 Award Period: 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: The School should have an internal control over each major compliance area, including allowability, to ensure all payments are allowable for the grant to which they are coded. Condition: It was noted that manual checks, wire transactions, and debit card purchases did not have documentation of the transactions being reviewed and approved. It was noted during payroll testing that none of the disbursements tested had documentation of reviewing the payment for allowability or amount. There was also no documentation of review for time and effort documentation. There were also payments to individuals for incorrect amounts that were charged to the grant. Questioned costs: $1,254.44 Context: Of the eight cash disbursements tested two of them did not have documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested, none of them had documentation of review and approval. Of the eight payroll items tested five of them had discrepancies between the amount paid to the individual and their approved contract. In some instances, there was an overpayment and in others an under-payment which caused some additional costs to be coded to the federal expenditures for this program. Cause: These types of payments were not reviewed and approved at a detailed level during the year, or if they were, that review was not formally documented. Effect: The School does not have any documentation of someone reviewing and approving the expenditures charged to the federal program, and in some situations paid out incorrect amounts to individuals coded to the program. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that all purchases and payroll are reviewed and approved, with part of that procedure being to review that the expenditures are allowable for the grant to which they are being recorded, and that time and effort are properly documented and reviewed. This review and approval should be documented so it is clear who reviewed it and when. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.