The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.
The SEFA prepared did not include assistance listing numbers for each program; grants provided to ICAST as a vendor and not a subrecipient were incorrectly included on the SEFA, and the SEFA was missing two programs where the grantor treated ICAST as a subrecipient. Accrual estimates were used for the expenditures that were not reconciled until eight months after year-end.