Audit 322531

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$1.05M
Findings
4
Programs
1
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-09-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
499725 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
499726 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - B
1076167 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
1076168 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
CDW6DWFCD5F3 Robert McCoy Auditee
7024097366 Jacqueline F. Matthew Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS FOR PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023, in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements.

Finding Details

U.S. Department of Education, Congressionally Funded Community Projects, Assistance Listing Number 84.215K – Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Over Written Policies – Procurement Compliance Requirement Criteria: As defined in 2 CFR 200.318, a recipient of federal grant funding must have and use its own documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317-327. Condition: During our audit, we were advised that while management used the Federal procurement standards at 2 CFR 200.317-327 in making all applicable decisions, the Foundation did not have written procurement policies tailored to the organization’s unique systems and processes. Cause: The Foundation’s risk assessment and internal control processes did not identify the requirement for written procurement procedures tailored to the organization’s unique systems and processes. Effect: Without written procurement procedures tailored to the organization's unique systems and processes, there is a risk that the staff and consultants responsible for ensuring compliance with the Foundation’s procurement policies will not be aware of proper procedures. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management develop written procurement procedures tailored to the Foundation’s unique systems and processes that conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317-327. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Written procurement procedures have been written for the Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation to ensure that procurements will be processed in conformity with 2 CFR 200.317 to 327. These procedures will be followed for procurements related to grants awarded to the entity. The dollar amount of the grant will determine the process to follow to be in compliance. Implementation of these changes will begin as of the date of this writing
U.S. Department of Education, Congressionally Funded Community Projects, Assistance Listing Number 84.215K – Internal Control Over Compliance, Approval of Payroll Transactions – Allowable Costs Compliance Requirement Criteria: As defined in 2 CFR 200.303, a recipient of federal grant funding must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: During our audit, we tested all payroll transactions drawn from Federal grant funds for three pay periods during the fiscal year. We discovered that for one employee during one pay period, no evidence of approval of the transaction was maintained. Cause: The Foundation’s internal controls over payroll transactions were not operating effectively. Effect: Improperly operating internal controls over payroll transactions could result in unallowable costs charged to federally sourced grant funds. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a system of internal controls that requires evidence of approval be maintained for all payroll transactions charged to federally sourced grants. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: To ensure that only proper labor costs are included in grant funding requests, the invoice reported to the grant issuing agency is reviewed by the Project Manager and evidenced by his signature. This review includes reviewing the individual labor charges prior to signing the invoice. All individuals who support the grant purpose and are funded by a grant will be separately identified and the ratio of allowable time to total time will be determined for each pay period. Allowable cost for each individual will be aggregated to the total labor cost for the period and be included in the invoice requesting fund draws. These procedures will be in effect as of the date of this writing.
U.S. Department of Education, Congressionally Funded Community Projects, Assistance Listing Number 84.215K – Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Over Written Policies – Procurement Compliance Requirement Criteria: As defined in 2 CFR 200.318, a recipient of federal grant funding must have and use its own documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal or subaward. The non-Federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317-327. Condition: During our audit, we were advised that while management used the Federal procurement standards at 2 CFR 200.317-327 in making all applicable decisions, the Foundation did not have written procurement policies tailored to the organization’s unique systems and processes. Cause: The Foundation’s risk assessment and internal control processes did not identify the requirement for written procurement procedures tailored to the organization’s unique systems and processes. Effect: Without written procurement procedures tailored to the organization's unique systems and processes, there is a risk that the staff and consultants responsible for ensuring compliance with the Foundation’s procurement policies will not be aware of proper procedures. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management develop written procurement procedures tailored to the Foundation’s unique systems and processes that conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317-327. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Written procurement procedures have been written for the Nevada Test Site Historical Foundation to ensure that procurements will be processed in conformity with 2 CFR 200.317 to 327. These procedures will be followed for procurements related to grants awarded to the entity. The dollar amount of the grant will determine the process to follow to be in compliance. Implementation of these changes will begin as of the date of this writing
U.S. Department of Education, Congressionally Funded Community Projects, Assistance Listing Number 84.215K – Internal Control Over Compliance, Approval of Payroll Transactions – Allowable Costs Compliance Requirement Criteria: As defined in 2 CFR 200.303, a recipient of federal grant funding must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: During our audit, we tested all payroll transactions drawn from Federal grant funds for three pay periods during the fiscal year. We discovered that for one employee during one pay period, no evidence of approval of the transaction was maintained. Cause: The Foundation’s internal controls over payroll transactions were not operating effectively. Effect: Improperly operating internal controls over payroll transactions could result in unallowable costs charged to federally sourced grant funds. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a system of internal controls that requires evidence of approval be maintained for all payroll transactions charged to federally sourced grants. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: To ensure that only proper labor costs are included in grant funding requests, the invoice reported to the grant issuing agency is reviewed by the Project Manager and evidenced by his signature. This review includes reviewing the individual labor charges prior to signing the invoice. All individuals who support the grant purpose and are funded by a grant will be separately identified and the ratio of allowable time to total time will be determined for each pay period. Allowable cost for each individual will be aggregated to the total labor cost for the period and be included in the invoice requesting fund draws. These procedures will be in effect as of the date of this writing.