Audit 322400

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$937,419
Findings
6
Programs
2
Organization: Town of Fountain City (IN)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-09-30
Auditor: Crowe LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
499544 2023-005 Material Weakness - I
499545 2023-005 Material Weakness - I
499546 2023-006 Significant Deficiency - L
1075986 2023-005 Material Weakness - I
1075987 2023-005 Material Weakness - I
1075988 2023-006 Significant Deficiency - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
JRFFK3GSNJC3 Trina D. McGuire Auditee
7658472412 Scott Nickerson Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Town has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. A. Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal grant activity of the Town of Fountain City (the “Town”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a select portion of the operations of the Town, it is not intended to and does not present the receipts, disbursements, and cash and investment balances – regulatory basis of the Town. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received.
Title: NOTE 2 - INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Town has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Town has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: NOTE 3 - OTHER INFORMATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Town has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Town did not have any subrecipient activity for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Finding Details

FINDING 2023-005 Subject: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number: WW21368901 and FY 2021 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority for WW21368901 and FY 2021 grant was direct Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Internal Controls Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement… (b) Simplified acquisition thresholds. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Town in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the simplified acquisitions procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured proper procurement procedures are followed. Context: For one procurement, we noted that the Town had one procured contract for $576,092 that met the simplified acquisition threshold and one contract for $35,880 that met the small purchase method threshold. The Town performed adequate procurement steps for the contract that met the simplified acquisition threshold but did not for the contract that met the small purchase method threshold. For the contract that fell under the small purchase method, management had support for one quote and noted that a second quote was obtained verbally. Management’s procurement policy states that three quotes must be obtained, and the contract must be awarded to the lowest bid. Management did not document the basis for purchasing from the vendor that was utilized. Additionally, for the contract that met the simplified acquisition threshold, management did not provide support indicating that the Town verified the vendor was not suspended or debarred. The Town verified that the vendor selected for the small purchase method was not suspended or debarred. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the simplified acquisition procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the Town’s management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the simplified acquisition purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-005 Subject: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number: WW21368901 and FY 2021 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority for WW21368901 and FY 2021 grant was direct Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Internal Controls Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement… (b) Simplified acquisition thresholds. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Town in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the simplified acquisitions procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured proper procurement procedures are followed. Context: For one procurement, we noted that the Town had one procured contract for $576,092 that met the simplified acquisition threshold and one contract for $35,880 that met the small purchase method threshold. The Town performed adequate procurement steps for the contract that met the simplified acquisition threshold but did not for the contract that met the small purchase method threshold. For the contract that fell under the small purchase method, management had support for one quote and noted that a second quote was obtained verbally. Management’s procurement policy states that three quotes must be obtained, and the contract must be awarded to the lowest bid. Management did not document the basis for purchasing from the vendor that was utilized. Additionally, for the contract that met the simplified acquisition threshold, management did not provide support indicating that the Town verified the vendor was not suspended or debarred. The Town verified that the vendor selected for the small purchase method was not suspended or debarred. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the simplified acquisition procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the Town’s management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the simplified acquisition purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-006 Subject: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number: FY 2021 Pass-Through Entity: N/A Compliance Requirements: Reporting Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Internal Controls Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: The Town did not have a documented review control in place to ensure the annual report was reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Cause: There were not sufficient internal controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the annual report. Context: There was no documented review by someone other than the preparer of the annual report to ensure the information submitted was complete and accurate. Per discussion with management, verbal review occurred but there is no documentation to support that review occurred. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Town at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented review prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-005 Subject: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number: WW21368901 and FY 2021 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority for WW21368901 and FY 2021 grant was direct Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Internal Controls Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement… (b) Simplified acquisition thresholds. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Town in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the simplified acquisitions procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured proper procurement procedures are followed. Context: For one procurement, we noted that the Town had one procured contract for $576,092 that met the simplified acquisition threshold and one contract for $35,880 that met the small purchase method threshold. The Town performed adequate procurement steps for the contract that met the simplified acquisition threshold but did not for the contract that met the small purchase method threshold. For the contract that fell under the small purchase method, management had support for one quote and noted that a second quote was obtained verbally. Management’s procurement policy states that three quotes must be obtained, and the contract must be awarded to the lowest bid. Management did not document the basis for purchasing from the vendor that was utilized. Additionally, for the contract that met the simplified acquisition threshold, management did not provide support indicating that the Town verified the vendor was not suspended or debarred. The Town verified that the vendor selected for the small purchase method was not suspended or debarred. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the simplified acquisition procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the Town’s management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the simplified acquisition purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-005 Subject: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number: WW21368901 and FY 2021 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority for WW21368901 and FY 2021 grant was direct Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Internal Controls Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement… (b) Simplified acquisition thresholds. The non-Federal entity is responsible for determining an appropriate simplified acquisition threshold based on internal controls, an evaluation of risk and its documented procurement procedures which must not exceed the threshold established in the FAR. When applicable, a lower simplified acquisition threshold used by the non-Federal entity must be authorized or not prohibited under State, local, or tribal laws or regulations. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the Town in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the simplified acquisitions procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Cause: Management had not established a system of internal control that would have ensured proper procurement procedures are followed. Context: For one procurement, we noted that the Town had one procured contract for $576,092 that met the simplified acquisition threshold and one contract for $35,880 that met the small purchase method threshold. The Town performed adequate procurement steps for the contract that met the simplified acquisition threshold but did not for the contract that met the small purchase method threshold. For the contract that fell under the small purchase method, management had support for one quote and noted that a second quote was obtained verbally. Management’s procurement policy states that three quotes must be obtained, and the contract must be awarded to the lowest bid. Management did not document the basis for purchasing from the vendor that was utilized. Additionally, for the contract that met the simplified acquisition threshold, management did not provide support indicating that the Town verified the vendor was not suspended or debarred. The Town verified that the vendor selected for the small purchase method was not suspended or debarred. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance with the grant agreement and the simplified acquisition procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the Town’s management establish controls related to the grant agreement and the simplified acquisition purchase procurement method of the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-006 Subject: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number: FY 2021 Pass-Through Entity: N/A Compliance Requirements: Reporting Audit Findings: Significant Deficiency, Internal Controls Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: The Town did not have a documented review control in place to ensure the annual report was reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Cause: There were not sufficient internal controls in place to ensure the accuracy of the annual report. Context: There was no documented review by someone other than the preparer of the annual report to ensure the information submitted was complete and accurate. Per discussion with management, verbal review occurred but there is no documentation to support that review occurred. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Town at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented review prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.