Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: New Haven Public Schools and Norwalk Public Schools Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding:
• Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) requires that payroll costs charged to a grants must have sufficient documentation to support the employee position and rate of pay and must also be supported by sufficient time and effort documentation. Time and effort can be accomplished through utilization of time sheets or personal activity reports (PAR), but must be completed at least monthly and must be signed by both the employee and the supervisor.
Condition: A sample of 21 employees was selected for testing. During that testing, we identified, 2 employees that did not have sufficient documentation to support their position and rate of pay. In addition, we identified 7 employees that did not have sufficient time and effort documentation to support the payroll cost charged to the grant.
Questioned Costs: Unknown
Context: Payroll costs comprised approximately 46% of total costs charged to this grant.
Cause: Due to turnover within the organization and changes within the organizational structure, underlying support as required by Uniform Guidance was not properly maintained.
Effect: The effect is that payroll costs charged to the grant could potentially be incorrectly stated and/or misallocated as of year-end.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that internal policies and procedures be reviewed and updated to ensure underlying supporting documentation is fully retained going forward.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: New Haven Public Schools and Norwalk Public Schools Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding:
• Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) requires that payroll costs charged to a grants must have sufficient documentation to support the employee position and rate of pay and must also be supported by sufficient time and effort documentation. Time and effort can be accomplished through utilization of time sheets or personal activity reports (PAR), but must be completed at least monthly and must be signed by both the employee and the supervisor.
Condition: A sample of 21 employees was selected for testing. During that testing, we identified, 2 employees that did not have sufficient documentation to support their position and rate of pay. In addition, we identified 7 employees that did not have sufficient time and effort documentation to support the payroll cost charged to the grant.
Questioned Costs: Unknown
Context: Payroll costs comprised approximately 46% of total costs charged to this grant.
Cause: Due to turnover within the organization and changes within the organizational structure, underlying support as required by Uniform Guidance was not properly maintained.
Effect: The effect is that payroll costs charged to the grant could potentially be incorrectly stated and/or misallocated as of year-end.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that internal policies and procedures be reviewed and updated to ensure underlying supporting documentation is fully retained going forward.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: New Haven Public Schools and Norwalk Public Schools Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding:
• Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) requires that payroll costs charged to a grants must have sufficient documentation to support the employee position and rate of pay and must also be supported by sufficient time and effort documentation. Time and effort can be accomplished through utilization of time sheets or personal activity reports (PAR), but must be completed at least monthly and must be signed by both the employee and the supervisor.
Condition: A sample of 21 employees was selected for testing. During that testing, we identified, 2 employees that did not have sufficient documentation to support their position and rate of pay. In addition, we identified 7 employees that did not have sufficient time and effort documentation to support the payroll cost charged to the grant.
Questioned Costs: Unknown
Context: Payroll costs comprised approximately 46% of total costs charged to this grant.
Cause: Due to turnover within the organization and changes within the organizational structure, underlying support as required by Uniform Guidance was not properly maintained.
Effect: The effect is that payroll costs charged to the grant could potentially be incorrectly stated and/or misallocated as of year-end.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that internal policies and procedures be reviewed and updated to ensure underlying supporting documentation is fully retained going forward.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury
Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Children & Families, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, City of Norwalk, City of New Haven
Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance.
Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326.
Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned.
Context: Although the Organization did not have a policy in place that is fully in conformity with the Federal Uniform Guidance criteria, the Organization did follow the Federal procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the Organization's major program.
Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the procurement standards.
Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: New Haven Public Schools and Norwalk Public Schools Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding:
• Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) requires that payroll costs charged to a grants must have sufficient documentation to support the employee position and rate of pay and must also be supported by sufficient time and effort documentation. Time and effort can be accomplished through utilization of time sheets or personal activity reports (PAR), but must be completed at least monthly and must be signed by both the employee and the supervisor.
Condition: A sample of 21 employees was selected for testing. During that testing, we identified, 2 employees that did not have sufficient documentation to support their position and rate of pay. In addition, we identified 7 employees that did not have sufficient time and effort documentation to support the payroll cost charged to the grant.
Questioned Costs: Unknown
Context: Payroll costs comprised approximately 46% of total costs charged to this grant.
Cause: Due to turnover within the organization and changes within the organizational structure, underlying support as required by Uniform Guidance was not properly maintained.
Effect: The effect is that payroll costs charged to the grant could potentially be incorrectly stated and/or misallocated as of year-end.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that internal policies and procedures be reviewed and updated to ensure underlying supporting documentation is fully retained going forward.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: New Haven Public Schools and Norwalk Public Schools Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding:
• Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) requires that payroll costs charged to a grants must have sufficient documentation to support the employee position and rate of pay and must also be supported by sufficient time and effort documentation. Time and effort can be accomplished through utilization of time sheets or personal activity reports (PAR), but must be completed at least monthly and must be signed by both the employee and the supervisor.
Condition: A sample of 21 employees was selected for testing. During that testing, we identified, 2 employees that did not have sufficient documentation to support their position and rate of pay. In addition, we identified 7 employees that did not have sufficient time and effort documentation to support the payroll cost charged to the grant.
Questioned Costs: Unknown
Context: Payroll costs comprised approximately 46% of total costs charged to this grant.
Cause: Due to turnover within the organization and changes within the organizational structure, underlying support as required by Uniform Guidance was not properly maintained.
Effect: The effect is that payroll costs charged to the grant could potentially be incorrectly stated and/or misallocated as of year-end.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that internal policies and procedures be reviewed and updated to ensure underlying supporting documentation is fully retained going forward.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: Department of Education
Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund
Assistance Listing Number: 84.425
Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various
Pass-Through Agency: New Haven Public Schools and Norwalk Public Schools Pass-Through Numbers: Various
Award Period: Various
Type of Finding:
• Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance
• Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion)
Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) requires that payroll costs charged to a grants must have sufficient documentation to support the employee position and rate of pay and must also be supported by sufficient time and effort documentation. Time and effort can be accomplished through utilization of time sheets or personal activity reports (PAR), but must be completed at least monthly and must be signed by both the employee and the supervisor.
Condition: A sample of 21 employees was selected for testing. During that testing, we identified, 2 employees that did not have sufficient documentation to support their position and rate of pay. In addition, we identified 7 employees that did not have sufficient time and effort documentation to support the payroll cost charged to the grant.
Questioned Costs: Unknown
Context: Payroll costs comprised approximately 46% of total costs charged to this grant.
Cause: Due to turnover within the organization and changes within the organizational structure, underlying support as required by Uniform Guidance was not properly maintained.
Effect: The effect is that payroll costs charged to the grant could potentially be incorrectly stated and/or misallocated as of year-end.
Repeat Finding: Finding does not represent a repeat finding.
Recommendation: We recommend that internal policies and procedures be reviewed and updated to ensure underlying supporting documentation is fully retained going forward.
Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. Refer to the separate corrective action plan.