Audit 321199

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$56.89M
Findings
4
Programs
27
Organization: City of Spokane (WA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-09-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
498488 2023-001 Material Weakness - I
498489 2023-001 Material Weakness - I
1074930 2023-001 Material Weakness - I
1074931 2023-001 Material Weakness - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $8.17M - 0
21.027 "covid-19" Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $7.76M Yes 1
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $1.33M - 0
15.916 Outdoor Recreation Acquisition, Development and Planning $1.17M - 0
21.023 "covid-19" Emergency Rental Assistance Program $746,686 Yes 0
14.276 Youth Homelessness Demonstration Program $645,702 - 0
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $560,968 - 0
14.218 "covid-19" Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Fund $318,367 - 0
16.753 Congressionally Recommended Awards $184,540 - 0
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $138,721 - 0
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $99,865 - 0
66.818 Brownfields Multipurpose, Assessment, Revolving Loan Fund, and Cleanup Cooperative Agreements $65,450 - 0
16.590 Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders Program $61,526 - 0
97.044 Assistance to Firefighters Grant $49,056 - 0
20.237 Motor Carrier Safety Assistance High Priority Activities Grants and Cooperative Agreements $43,632 - 0
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $29,866 - 0
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $23,485 - 0
14.239 "covid-19" Home Investment Partnerships Program $23,346 - 0
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $14,177 - 0
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $9,911 - 0
16.588 Violence Against Women Formula Grants $9,448 - 0
15.904 Historic Preservation Fund Grants-in-Aid $7,463 - 0
97.018 National Fire Academy Training Assistance $6,513 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $5,811 - 0
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $1,591 - 0
14.231 "covid-19" Emergency Solutions Grant Program $404 - 0
97.044 "covid-19" Assistance to Firefighters Grant $256 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
PDNCLY8MYJN3 Michelle Murray Auditee
5096256320 Alisha Shaw Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 3 - Revolving Loan - Program Income Accounting Policies: Note 1 - Basis of Accounting: This schedule is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the City's financial statements. The City uses the modified accrual basis of accounting for all governmental funds. The accrual basis of accounting is used for all proprietary, non-expendable trust and pension trust funds. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 2 - Federal Indirect Cost Rate: The City has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The amount expended includes amounts claimed as an indirect cost recovery using an indirect cost rate of up to 104.39%, depending on the allowable maximum amount per the grant and the department charging the grant. The City has a revolving loan program for low income housing renovation. Under this federal program, repayments to the City are considered program revenues (income) and loans of such funds to eligible recipients are considered expenditures. The amount of loan funds disbursed to program participants for the year was $615,999.13 and is presented in this schedule. The amount of principal received in loan repayments for the year was $803,400.47. See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table.
Title: Note 4 - Noncash Awards - Travel Accounting Policies: Note 1 - Basis of Accounting: This schedule is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the City's financial statements. The City uses the modified accrual basis of accounting for all governmental funds. The accrual basis of accounting is used for all proprietary, non-expendable trust and pension trust funds. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 2 - Federal Indirect Cost Rate: The City has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The amount expended includes amounts claimed as an indirect cost recovery using an indirect cost rate of up to 104.39%, depending on the allowable maximum amount per the grant and the department charging the grant. (a) The City received airfair costs to attend "National Fire Academy in Emmitsburg, MD" from FEMA. The amount reported on the SEFA is the value of the federally paid portion of the travel costs.
Title: Note 5 - Noncash Awards - Equipment Accounting Policies: Note 1 - Basis of Accounting: This schedule is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the City's financial statements. The City uses the modified accrual basis of accounting for all governmental funds. The accrual basis of accounting is used for all proprietary, non-expendable trust and pension trust funds. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 2 - Federal Indirect Cost Rate: The City has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The amount expended includes amounts claimed as an indirect cost recovery using an indirect cost rate of up to 104.39%, depending on the allowable maximum amount per the grant and the department charging the grant. (a) The City received equipment that as purchased with the federal Department of Homeland Security funds by Idaho Office of Emergency Management. The amount reported on the Schedule, $11,600.00, is the value of the property on the date it was received by the City and priced by the DHS-Idaho Office of Emergency Management. (b) City received supplies purchased with federal Department of Homeland Security funding by Idaho Office of Emergency Management. The amount reported on the Schedule, $4,876.60, is the value of the property on the date it was received by the City and priced by the DHS-Idaho Office of Emergency Management. (c) The city received equipment that was purchased with federal Department of Homeland security funds by Spokane County Department of Emergency Management. The amount reported on the Schedule, $99,864.73, is the value of the property on the date it was received by the City and priced by Spokane County Emergency Management.
Title: Note 6 - Program Costs Accounting Policies: Note 1 - Basis of Accounting: This schedule is prepared on the same basis of accounting as the City's financial statements. The City uses the modified accrual basis of accounting for all governmental funds. The accrual basis of accounting is used for all proprietary, non-expendable trust and pension trust funds. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 2 - Federal Indirect Cost Rate: The City has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The amount expended includes amounts claimed as an indirect cost recovery using an indirect cost rate of up to 104.39%, depending on the allowable maximum amount per the grant and the department charging the grant. The amounts shown as current year expenditures represent only the federal grant portion of the program costs. Entire program costs, including the City's portion, are more than shown. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or limited as to reimbursement.

Finding Details

SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS City of Spokane January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 2023-001 The City’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: SLT-0533 Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Commerce Pass-through Award/Contract Number: SFY23-46141-011 SFY23-46141-014 21-4619C-133 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In 2023, the City spent about $34.6 million in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. The City may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract and must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. The City has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status of contractors that it pays more than $25,000 with federal funds. However, the City entered into three new contracts in 2023 and paid these contractors more than $25,000 for public safety vehicles and equipment without following its established process to verify the contractors’ status. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition The City purchased vehicles and equipment from two contractors using other governments’ contracts, which is commonly referred to as “piggybacking.” City staff responsible for the purchases relied on the awarding agency’s suspension and debarment verification to ensure compliance with this requirement. By relying on the awarding agency, staff did not follow the City’s standard procedure of obtaining written certifications from the contractors. Additionally, the City purchased equipment from another contractor and did not initially intend to use federal funds to pay them. Therefore, City staff did not obtain a written certification of the contractor’s suspension and debarment status when they executed the contract. When the City decided to use federal funds for this purchase, staff responsible for the purchase did not verify at that time that the contractor was not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain written certifications, insert a clause into the contracts or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify the contractors it paid with federal funds were not suspended or debarred. The City paid $3.6 million to these contractors in 2023. Without adequate internal controls, the City cannot ensure the contractors it paid with federal funds were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay contractors that were suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the federal grantor could potentially recover them. During the audit, we verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, so we are not questioning costs for these payments. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls to ensure it verifies that all contractors paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred. We also recommend the City establish a process to ensure it verifies the suspension and debarment status of contractors it purchases from when piggybacking. City’s Response The City understands the importance of verifying it is not contracting with, making purchases with, or making subawards to parties debarred or suspended from doing business with the federal government. The City did not contract with any parties who were debarred or suspended from doing business with the federal government during the audited period. The City currently has a robust process to verify and document its contractors, consultants and vendors are neither debarred nor suspended. This process adds required certification language to all City agreements to document compliance. While two of these contracts were reviewed and the compliant status of the providers were verified through the existing cooperative agreement, unfortunately the City’s process did not capture the needed requirement to verify at the lower tier. The City is now putting into place a requirement that all subawards, purchase agreements and contracts involving federal funds over $25,000 will include the required certification even if the contract is derived from “piggy backing” and includes suspension and debarment language. The City will also add measures to our existing process to capture such agreements that were not initially identified as federal funding and later classified as such to include additional steps to ensure the required certification language is included to correct this oversight. The City extends our appreciation to the State Auditor’s Office for assisting in identifying deficiencies in our procedures. We are dedicated to executing contracts and purchase agreements that are compliant with federal requirements and are confident that the additional implemented process will ensure compliance with suspension and debarment certification requirements. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review corrective action taken during the next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines on Agencies on Governmentwide Department and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS City of Spokane January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 2023-001 The City’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: SLT-0533 Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Commerce Pass-through Award/Contract Number: SFY23-46141-011 SFY23-46141-014 21-4619C-133 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In 2023, the City spent about $34.6 million in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. The City may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract and must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. The City has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status of contractors that it pays more than $25,000 with federal funds. However, the City entered into three new contracts in 2023 and paid these contractors more than $25,000 for public safety vehicles and equipment without following its established process to verify the contractors’ status. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition The City purchased vehicles and equipment from two contractors using other governments’ contracts, which is commonly referred to as “piggybacking.” City staff responsible for the purchases relied on the awarding agency’s suspension and debarment verification to ensure compliance with this requirement. By relying on the awarding agency, staff did not follow the City’s standard procedure of obtaining written certifications from the contractors. Additionally, the City purchased equipment from another contractor and did not initially intend to use federal funds to pay them. Therefore, City staff did not obtain a written certification of the contractor’s suspension and debarment status when they executed the contract. When the City decided to use federal funds for this purchase, staff responsible for the purchase did not verify at that time that the contractor was not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain written certifications, insert a clause into the contracts or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify the contractors it paid with federal funds were not suspended or debarred. The City paid $3.6 million to these contractors in 2023. Without adequate internal controls, the City cannot ensure the contractors it paid with federal funds were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay contractors that were suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the federal grantor could potentially recover them. During the audit, we verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, so we are not questioning costs for these payments. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls to ensure it verifies that all contractors paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred. We also recommend the City establish a process to ensure it verifies the suspension and debarment status of contractors it purchases from when piggybacking. City’s Response The City understands the importance of verifying it is not contracting with, making purchases with, or making subawards to parties debarred or suspended from doing business with the federal government. The City did not contract with any parties who were debarred or suspended from doing business with the federal government during the audited period. The City currently has a robust process to verify and document its contractors, consultants and vendors are neither debarred nor suspended. This process adds required certification language to all City agreements to document compliance. While two of these contracts were reviewed and the compliant status of the providers were verified through the existing cooperative agreement, unfortunately the City’s process did not capture the needed requirement to verify at the lower tier. The City is now putting into place a requirement that all subawards, purchase agreements and contracts involving federal funds over $25,000 will include the required certification even if the contract is derived from “piggy backing” and includes suspension and debarment language. The City will also add measures to our existing process to capture such agreements that were not initially identified as federal funding and later classified as such to include additional steps to ensure the required certification language is included to correct this oversight. The City extends our appreciation to the State Auditor’s Office for assisting in identifying deficiencies in our procedures. We are dedicated to executing contracts and purchase agreements that are compliant with federal requirements and are confident that the additional implemented process will ensure compliance with suspension and debarment certification requirements. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review corrective action taken during the next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines on Agencies on Governmentwide Department and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS City of Spokane January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 2023-001 The City’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: SLT-0533 Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Commerce Pass-through Award/Contract Number: SFY23-46141-011 SFY23-46141-014 21-4619C-133 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In 2023, the City spent about $34.6 million in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. The City may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract and must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. The City has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status of contractors that it pays more than $25,000 with federal funds. However, the City entered into three new contracts in 2023 and paid these contractors more than $25,000 for public safety vehicles and equipment without following its established process to verify the contractors’ status. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition The City purchased vehicles and equipment from two contractors using other governments’ contracts, which is commonly referred to as “piggybacking.” City staff responsible for the purchases relied on the awarding agency’s suspension and debarment verification to ensure compliance with this requirement. By relying on the awarding agency, staff did not follow the City’s standard procedure of obtaining written certifications from the contractors. Additionally, the City purchased equipment from another contractor and did not initially intend to use federal funds to pay them. Therefore, City staff did not obtain a written certification of the contractor’s suspension and debarment status when they executed the contract. When the City decided to use federal funds for this purchase, staff responsible for the purchase did not verify at that time that the contractor was not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain written certifications, insert a clause into the contracts or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify the contractors it paid with federal funds were not suspended or debarred. The City paid $3.6 million to these contractors in 2023. Without adequate internal controls, the City cannot ensure the contractors it paid with federal funds were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay contractors that were suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the federal grantor could potentially recover them. During the audit, we verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, so we are not questioning costs for these payments. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls to ensure it verifies that all contractors paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred. We also recommend the City establish a process to ensure it verifies the suspension and debarment status of contractors it purchases from when piggybacking. City’s Response The City understands the importance of verifying it is not contracting with, making purchases with, or making subawards to parties debarred or suspended from doing business with the federal government. The City did not contract with any parties who were debarred or suspended from doing business with the federal government during the audited period. The City currently has a robust process to verify and document its contractors, consultants and vendors are neither debarred nor suspended. This process adds required certification language to all City agreements to document compliance. While two of these contracts were reviewed and the compliant status of the providers were verified through the existing cooperative agreement, unfortunately the City’s process did not capture the needed requirement to verify at the lower tier. The City is now putting into place a requirement that all subawards, purchase agreements and contracts involving federal funds over $25,000 will include the required certification even if the contract is derived from “piggy backing” and includes suspension and debarment language. The City will also add measures to our existing process to capture such agreements that were not initially identified as federal funding and later classified as such to include additional steps to ensure the required certification language is included to correct this oversight. The City extends our appreciation to the State Auditor’s Office for assisting in identifying deficiencies in our procedures. We are dedicated to executing contracts and purchase agreements that are compliant with federal requirements and are confident that the additional implemented process will ensure compliance with suspension and debarment certification requirements. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review corrective action taken during the next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines on Agencies on Governmentwide Department and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS City of Spokane January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 2023-001 The City’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: SLT-0533 Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Commerce Pass-through Award/Contract Number: SFY23-46141-011 SFY23-46141-014 21-4619C-133 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In 2023, the City spent about $34.6 million in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. The City may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract and must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. The City has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status of contractors that it pays more than $25,000 with federal funds. However, the City entered into three new contracts in 2023 and paid these contractors more than $25,000 for public safety vehicles and equipment without following its established process to verify the contractors’ status. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition The City purchased vehicles and equipment from two contractors using other governments’ contracts, which is commonly referred to as “piggybacking.” City staff responsible for the purchases relied on the awarding agency’s suspension and debarment verification to ensure compliance with this requirement. By relying on the awarding agency, staff did not follow the City’s standard procedure of obtaining written certifications from the contractors. Additionally, the City purchased equipment from another contractor and did not initially intend to use federal funds to pay them. Therefore, City staff did not obtain a written certification of the contractor’s suspension and debarment status when they executed the contract. When the City decided to use federal funds for this purchase, staff responsible for the purchase did not verify at that time that the contractor was not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain written certifications, insert a clause into the contracts or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify the contractors it paid with federal funds were not suspended or debarred. The City paid $3.6 million to these contractors in 2023. Without adequate internal controls, the City cannot ensure the contractors it paid with federal funds were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay contractors that were suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the federal grantor could potentially recover them. During the audit, we verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, so we are not questioning costs for these payments. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls to ensure it verifies that all contractors paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred. We also recommend the City establish a process to ensure it verifies the suspension and debarment status of contractors it purchases from when piggybacking. City’s Response The City understands the importance of verifying it is not contracting with, making purchases with, or making subawards to parties debarred or suspended from doing business with the federal government. The City did not contract with any parties who were debarred or suspended from doing business with the federal government during the audited period. The City currently has a robust process to verify and document its contractors, consultants and vendors are neither debarred nor suspended. This process adds required certification language to all City agreements to document compliance. While two of these contracts were reviewed and the compliant status of the providers were verified through the existing cooperative agreement, unfortunately the City’s process did not capture the needed requirement to verify at the lower tier. The City is now putting into place a requirement that all subawards, purchase agreements and contracts involving federal funds over $25,000 will include the required certification even if the contract is derived from “piggy backing” and includes suspension and debarment language. The City will also add measures to our existing process to capture such agreements that were not initially identified as federal funding and later classified as such to include additional steps to ensure the required certification language is included to correct this oversight. The City extends our appreciation to the State Auditor’s Office for assisting in identifying deficiencies in our procedures. We are dedicated to executing contracts and purchase agreements that are compliant with federal requirements and are confident that the additional implemented process will ensure compliance with suspension and debarment certification requirements. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review corrective action taken during the next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines on Agencies on Governmentwide Department and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.