Audit 321050

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$3.14M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-09-25

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
498296 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
1074738 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
NSHLE77RR7K3 Barton Groh Auditee
7032990200 Julien Decosimo Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of IDSA under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of IDSA, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of IDSA. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: IDSA elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: SUBRECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of IDSA under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of IDSA, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of IDSA. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: IDSA elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. IDSA has entered into an agreement with a subrecipient for certain grants. Under the terms of the agreement, payment is made to the subrecipient based on the completion of certain activities. Liabilities have only been accrued for services provided through December 31, 2023.

Finding Details

Federal agency: Center for Disease Control and Prevention Federal program title: Protecting and Improving Health Globally Assistance Listing Number: 93.318 Award Period: 09/30/2021-09/29/2024 • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of suspension and debarment. 2 CFR Part 180.220, states that recipients of federal funds are prohibited from contracting with or making sub awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity IDSA should have internal controls designed and effectively operating to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, we noted IDSA did not maintain support to show its review of the search for suspension and debarment was done before contracts were entered into. IDSA did not have effective controls to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: For one out of one vendor tested, we noted that documentation related to suspension and debarment verification was dated after the contract was entered into. However, our testing did not identify any vendors that had been suspended or debarred. Cause: The policies and procedures surrounding suspension and debarment verification were not consistently followed as designed. Effect: CLA noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of effective internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend IDSA ensure consistent application of its policies and procedures so that an adequate verification process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: Center for Disease Control and Prevention Federal program title: Protecting and Improving Health Globally Assistance Listing Number: 93.318 Award Period: 09/30/2021-09/29/2024 • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matter Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of suspension and debarment. 2 CFR Part 180.220, states that recipients of federal funds are prohibited from contracting with or making sub awards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include those procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria. When a nonfederal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity IDSA should have internal controls designed and effectively operating to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, we noted IDSA did not maintain support to show its review of the search for suspension and debarment was done before contracts were entered into. IDSA did not have effective controls to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: For one out of one vendor tested, we noted that documentation related to suspension and debarment verification was dated after the contract was entered into. However, our testing did not identify any vendors that had been suspended or debarred. Cause: The policies and procedures surrounding suspension and debarment verification were not consistently followed as designed. Effect: CLA noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment; however, the lack of effective internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend IDSA ensure consistent application of its policies and procedures so that an adequate verification process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract. Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.