Audit 318650

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$6.16M
Findings
2
Programs
10
Organization: City of Anderson (IN)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-09-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
485907 2023-001 Material Weakness - F
1062349 2023-001 Material Weakness - F

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
20.507 Federal Transit_formula Grants $2.50M - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.23M Yes 0
20.106 Airport Improvement Program $694,056 - 0
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $338,963 Yes 0
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $250,561 - 0
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $99,750 - 0
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $34,417 - 0
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $12,018 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $4,106 - 0
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $1,275 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
PEXKUKAM6DZ3 Douglas Whitham Auditee
7656486025 Beth Kelley, Cpa, Cfe Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies A. Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federal grant activity of the City under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a select portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position of the City. B. Other Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, or the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement is received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 2. Indirect Cost Rate The City has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

FINDING 2023-001 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Year (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-18-MC-18-0001, B-19-MC-18-0001, B-20-MC-18-0001, B-21-MC-18-0001, B-22-MC-18-0001, B-23-MC-18-0001 Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants (CDBG) may be used to acquire real and personal property, supplies, and equipment. Equipment purchased with CDBG funds requires management, among other things, to maintain property records, complete a physical inventory, safeguard against loss, and properly maintain the equipment. A property record or capital asset listing, which would include the following attributes, is to be maintained for assets purchased.  A description of the property.  A serial number or other identification number.  The source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number FAIN).  Who holds title.  The acquisition date.  Cost of the property.  Percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired.  The location.  Use and condition of the property. Although the City maintained property records, adequate property records for assets purchased with CDBG award funds was not maintained. The one asset purchased with CDBG funds, totaling $222,333, was added to the property records, but did not include the source of funding for the property, who holds title, percentage of federal participation, and condition of the property. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ". . . (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. The City did not add an improvement as they were unaware that this should be added to the property records. In addition, the property records did not include all the necessary fields as the City did not know the additional information was needed. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, not all required elements of the property record were documented for assets acquired with CDBG award funds nor were all assets added to the property records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure property records are maintained for all assets purchased and that all required elements are included within the property records. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-001 Subject: CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listings Number: 14.218 Federal Award Numbers and Year (or Other Identifying Numbers): B-18-MC-18-0001, B-19-MC-18-0001, B-20-MC-18-0001, B-21-MC-18-0001, B-22-MC-18-0001, B-23-MC-18-0001 Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants (CDBG) may be used to acquire real and personal property, supplies, and equipment. Equipment purchased with CDBG funds requires management, among other things, to maintain property records, complete a physical inventory, safeguard against loss, and properly maintain the equipment. A property record or capital asset listing, which would include the following attributes, is to be maintained for assets purchased.  A description of the property.  A serial number or other identification number.  The source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number FAIN).  Who holds title.  The acquisition date.  Cost of the property.  Percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired.  The location.  Use and condition of the property. Although the City maintained property records, adequate property records for assets purchased with CDBG award funds was not maintained. The one asset purchased with CDBG funds, totaling $222,333, was added to the property records, but did not include the source of funding for the property, who holds title, percentage of federal participation, and condition of the property. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: ". . . (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. (2) A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. (3) A control system must be developed to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of the property. Any loss, damage, or theft must be investigated. (4) Adequate maintenance procedures must be developed to keep the property in good condition. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. The City did not add an improvement as they were unaware that this should be added to the property records. In addition, the property records did not include all the necessary fields as the City did not know the additional information was needed. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, not all required elements of the property record were documented for assets acquired with CDBG award funds nor were all assets added to the property records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure property records are maintained for all assets purchased and that all required elements are included within the property records. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.