Audit 318191

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$5.77M
Findings
6
Programs
11
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-08-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
485463 2023-006 Significant Deficiency - AB
485464 2023-007 Significant Deficiency - AB
485465 2023-008 Significant Deficiency - AB
1061905 2023-006 Significant Deficiency - AB
1061906 2023-007 Significant Deficiency - AB
1061907 2023-008 Significant Deficiency - AB

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.041 Impact Aid $3.72M Yes 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $170,902 Yes 1
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $163,584 - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $55,475 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $46,750 - 0
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $24,532 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $20,305 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $12,419 - 0
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $5,371 - 0
10.649 Pandemic Ebt Administrative Costs $1,884 - 0
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants $393 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
HAACPS23NXW4 Christopher Carballo Auditee
8454469575 Nugent & Haeussler, P.c. Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Indirect costs may be included in the reported expenditures, to the extent that they are included in thefederal financial reports used as the source for the data presented. Certain of the District's federal awardprograms have been charged with indirect costs, based upon an established rate applied to overallexpenditures. There is no other indirect cost allocation plan in effect. Matching costs (the District's share of certain program costs) are not included in the reported expenditures. The basis of accounting varies by federal program consistent with the underlyingregulations pertaining to each program. The amounts reported as federal expenditures were obtainedfrom the federal financial reports for the applicable program and periods. The amounts reported in these reports are prepared from records maintained for each program, which are reconciled with the District's financial reporting system.The amounts reported as federal expenditures were obtained from the federal financial reports for theapplicable program and periods. The amounts reported in these reports are prepared from records maintained for each program, which are reconciled with the District's financial reporting system. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents the activity of federal awardprograms administered by the District, which is described in Note 1 to the District's accompanyingfinancial statements, using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Federal awards that are included inthe schedule may be received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards that are passedthrough from other government agencies. The information is presented in accordance with therequirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Uniform AdministrativeRequirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance).Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements.
Title: NON-CASH ASSISTANCE Accounting Policies: Indirect costs may be included in the reported expenditures, to the extent that they are included in thefederal financial reports used as the source for the data presented. Certain of the District's federal awardprograms have been charged with indirect costs, based upon an established rate applied to overallexpenditures. There is no other indirect cost allocation plan in effect. Matching costs (the District's share of certain program costs) are not included in the reported expenditures. The basis of accounting varies by federal program consistent with the underlyingregulations pertaining to each program. The amounts reported as federal expenditures were obtainedfrom the federal financial reports for the applicable program and periods. The amounts reported in these reports are prepared from records maintained for each program, which are reconciled with the District's financial reporting system.The amounts reported as federal expenditures were obtained from the federal financial reports for theapplicable program and periods. The amounts reported in these reports are prepared from records maintained for each program, which are reconciled with the District's financial reporting system. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The District is the recipient of a federal award program that does not result in cash receipts or disbursements. The District was granted $20,305 of commodities under the Community Supplemental Food Program (AL# 10.555)
Title: OTHER DISCLOSURES Accounting Policies: Indirect costs may be included in the reported expenditures, to the extent that they are included in thefederal financial reports used as the source for the data presented. Certain of the District's federal awardprograms have been charged with indirect costs, based upon an established rate applied to overallexpenditures. There is no other indirect cost allocation plan in effect. Matching costs (the District's share of certain program costs) are not included in the reported expenditures. The basis of accounting varies by federal program consistent with the underlyingregulations pertaining to each program. The amounts reported as federal expenditures were obtainedfrom the federal financial reports for the applicable program and periods. The amounts reported in these reports are prepared from records maintained for each program, which are reconciled with the District's financial reporting system.The amounts reported as federal expenditures were obtained from the federal financial reports for theapplicable program and periods. The amounts reported in these reports are prepared from records maintained for each program, which are reconciled with the District's financial reporting system. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. No insurance is carried specifically to cover equipment purchased with federal funds. Any equipment purchased with federal funds has only a nominal value, and is covered ny the District's casualty insurance policies. There were no loans or loan guarantees outstanding at year end.

Finding Details

Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Cost/Cost Principles U.S. Department of Education Passed through NYS Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund AL#: 84.425D Condition: Payroll and fringe benefits were charged to the ESSER 2 grant in excess of the amount allocable for services performed in the program. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards in accordance with 2CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs states that costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:(a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles.(b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items.(c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost.(e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part.(f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Context: Our audit of payroll service by individual employee charged to the ESSER 2 grant found that a journal entry had been made to equal the budgeted amount of payroll which was in excess of the actual expenditures. Questioned costs are $24,289 in direct payroll and $14,341 in related fringe benefits. Cause: The District did not have sufficient internal controls in place to ensure that the recorded amounts were adequately documented and reconciled by individual employees working in the program. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the requirements of the Education Stabilization Fund program with respect to Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s written procedures addressing internal controls with respect to program requirements be followed to ensure the District is in compliance at all times. View of Responsible Officials: Highland Falls-Fort Montgomery Central School District’s management concurs with this finding. The District is in the process of implementing procedures to ensure that compliance is maintained in the future. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 12 – 13.
Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Cost/Cost Principles U.S. Department of Education Passed through NYS Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund AL#: 84.425U Condition: In accordance with C.R. 170.2 of the Commissioner’s Regulations, the District requires Purchase Orders to be established to encumber the approved budget items for each expenditure code. The complete bill packet including the Purchase Order, receiving slip, and invoice is submitted for authorization of payment. For the ARP Learning Loss Grant, Purchase Orders were created after the dates of service. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards in accordance with 2CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs states that costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:(a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles.(b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items.(c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost.(e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part.(f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Context: 4 items from a total population of 7 were selected for testing. A Purchase Order was initiated on 11//10/22 for an event that occurred on 8/31/22. Questioned Costs are $4,100. A purchase order dated 1/27/23 included an event that had occurred on 11/16/22. Questioned Costs are $1,750. Cause: The District did not have sufficient internal controls in place to ensure that Purchase Orders are created in accordance C.R. 170.2 of the Commissioner’s Regulations. When the invoices were received, a Purchase Order was required to be able to pay the vendor. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the requirements of the Education Stabilization Fund program with respect to Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s written procedures addressing internal controls with respect to program requirements be followed to ensure the District is in compliance at all times. View of Responsible Officials: Highland Falls-Fort Montgomery Central School District’s management concurs with this finding. The District is in the process of implementing procedures to ensure that compliance is maintained in the future. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 12 – 13.
Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Cost/Cost Principles U.S. Department of Education Passed through NYS Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund AL#: 84.425U Condition: Payroll Costs for one employee were charged to the UPK grant in excess of the employee’s wages for the year. Criteria: 2CFR Section 200.430 requires that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must also (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Context: Our review of the payroll in the UPK grant found that one employee had payroll recorded to the grant that exceed their full payroll for the year. The employee was docked pay that was incorrectly charged to the General Fund creating a negative earning in the general Fund. Questioned Costs are $736. Cause: The employee was docked pay that was incorrectly charged to the General Fund creating a negative earning in the General Fund and an overstatement in the UPK Grant. Questioned Costs are $736. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the requirements of the Education Stabilization Fund program with respect to Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s written procedures addressing internal controls with respect to program requirements be followed to ensure the District is in compliance at all times. View of Responsible Officials: Highland Falls-Fort Montgomery Central School District’s management concurs with this finding. The District is in the process of implementing procedures to ensure that compliance is maintained in the future. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 12 – 13.
Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Cost/Cost Principles U.S. Department of Education Passed through NYS Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund AL#: 84.425D Condition: Payroll and fringe benefits were charged to the ESSER 2 grant in excess of the amount allocable for services performed in the program. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards in accordance with 2CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs states that costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:(a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles.(b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items.(c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost.(e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part.(f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Context: Our audit of payroll service by individual employee charged to the ESSER 2 grant found that a journal entry had been made to equal the budgeted amount of payroll which was in excess of the actual expenditures. Questioned costs are $24,289 in direct payroll and $14,341 in related fringe benefits. Cause: The District did not have sufficient internal controls in place to ensure that the recorded amounts were adequately documented and reconciled by individual employees working in the program. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the requirements of the Education Stabilization Fund program with respect to Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s written procedures addressing internal controls with respect to program requirements be followed to ensure the District is in compliance at all times. View of Responsible Officials: Highland Falls-Fort Montgomery Central School District’s management concurs with this finding. The District is in the process of implementing procedures to ensure that compliance is maintained in the future. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 12 – 13.
Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Cost/Cost Principles U.S. Department of Education Passed through NYS Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund AL#: 84.425U Condition: In accordance with C.R. 170.2 of the Commissioner’s Regulations, the District requires Purchase Orders to be established to encumber the approved budget items for each expenditure code. The complete bill packet including the Purchase Order, receiving slip, and invoice is submitted for authorization of payment. For the ARP Learning Loss Grant, Purchase Orders were created after the dates of service. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the District is required to establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards in accordance with 2CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in section 200.403 – Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs states that costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards:(a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles.(b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items.(c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost.(e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part.(f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. (h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Context: 4 items from a total population of 7 were selected for testing. A Purchase Order was initiated on 11//10/22 for an event that occurred on 8/31/22. Questioned Costs are $4,100. A purchase order dated 1/27/23 included an event that had occurred on 11/16/22. Questioned Costs are $1,750. Cause: The District did not have sufficient internal controls in place to ensure that Purchase Orders are created in accordance C.R. 170.2 of the Commissioner’s Regulations. When the invoices were received, a Purchase Order was required to be able to pay the vendor. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the requirements of the Education Stabilization Fund program with respect to Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s written procedures addressing internal controls with respect to program requirements be followed to ensure the District is in compliance at all times. View of Responsible Officials: Highland Falls-Fort Montgomery Central School District’s management concurs with this finding. The District is in the process of implementing procedures to ensure that compliance is maintained in the future. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 12 – 13.
Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Cost/Cost Principles U.S. Department of Education Passed through NYS Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund AL#: 84.425U Condition: Payroll Costs for one employee were charged to the UPK grant in excess of the employee’s wages for the year. Criteria: 2CFR Section 200.430 requires that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must also (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Context: Our review of the payroll in the UPK grant found that one employee had payroll recorded to the grant that exceed their full payroll for the year. The employee was docked pay that was incorrectly charged to the General Fund creating a negative earning in the general Fund. Questioned Costs are $736. Cause: The employee was docked pay that was incorrectly charged to the General Fund creating a negative earning in the General Fund and an overstatement in the UPK Grant. Questioned Costs are $736. Effect: The District is not in compliance with the requirements of the Education Stabilization Fund program with respect to Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the District’s written procedures addressing internal controls with respect to program requirements be followed to ensure the District is in compliance at all times. View of Responsible Officials: Highland Falls-Fort Montgomery Central School District’s management concurs with this finding. The District is in the process of implementing procedures to ensure that compliance is maintained in the future. Please refer to the corrective action plan on pages 12 – 13.