Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Federal program title: American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Fund (PRF)
Assistance Listing Number: 93.498
Award Period: Reporting Period 4 for funds received from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, used
through December 31, 2022
Type of Finding:
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The Hospital did not have documented formal controls and procedures over compliance with federal awards.
Condition: The Hospital did not have documented formal review processes over the use of the federal awards, or required reporting for the federal awards. Eligible uses of federal awards were tracked in detail and reviewed, but there was not a formal documented review process over whether expenditures were eligible under the federal award in all cases. Required reporting under the federal award was completed, but there was not a formal review or approval process in place.
Context: The Hospital maintained detailed records of eligible uses of federal funds for tracking and required reporting purposes. The Hospital's CFO maintained this schedule as eligible uses of funds were identified throughout the organization, reviewed activity, and reconciled the schedule to the general ledger. There was not, however, documentation of a formal review or approval, outside of the schedule being maintained and reconciled. Similarly, the Hospital CFO completed the required reporting under the federal award based on the schedule discussed above, a lost revenue calculation, and other supporting documentation, but there was no formal review or approval process for that report. Management did also make regular reports to governance in monthly financial reports, including the use of COVID relief funds. These reports only covered more significant uses of funds and overall status updates on remaining funding, not a comprehensive report of all uses. The Hospital does have in place
review processes and controls over all expenditures (AP, Payroll), they are just not designed specifically to consider compliance with federal program.
Cause: Prior to the Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and ARP rural funding, the Hospital had not previously received federal awards in an amount sufficient to require an audit under Uniform Guidance. Therefore, more formal controls and procedures around the use of federal awards had not been in place. The American Rescue Plan, Provider Relief Fund, and certain other federal funds received in response to the COVID-19 pandemic were an unexpected occurrence. As the relief funds were distributed to the Hospital, the focus of Hospital management and governance was on responding to the pandemic, and tracking use of related relief funds, and not necessarily on incorporating formal policies and procedures due to the time sensitive nature of the pandemic.
Effect: Without formal control and review processes in place over use of federal funds or required reporting under those awards, there is a greater risk of improper use of funds or misstatement in required reporting.
Repeat finding: No
Recommendation: We recommend that management implement more formal control process surrounding the use of federal awards where there is segregation between individuals identifying or proposing expenditures/uses of funds and an individual reviewing and approving that expenditure/use. We also recommend for any formal reporting required under federal awards that there be a formal review process where an individual is reviewing and approving the report who did not prepare the report. Documentation of review and approval should be retained in both cases.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Federal program title: American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Fund (PRF)
Assistance Listing Number: 93.498
Award Period: Reporting Period 4 for funds received from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, used
through December 31, 2022
Type of Finding:
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The Hospital did not have documented formal controls and procedures over compliance with federal awards.
Condition: The Hospital did not have documented formal review processes over the use of the federal awards, or required reporting for the federal awards. Eligible uses of federal awards were tracked in detail and reviewed, but there was not a formal documented review process over whether expenditures were eligible under the federal award in all cases. Required reporting under the federal award was completed, but there was not a formal review or approval process in place.
Context: The Hospital maintained detailed records of eligible uses of federal funds for tracking and required reporting purposes. The Hospital's CFO maintained this schedule as eligible uses of funds were identified throughout the organization, reviewed activity, and reconciled the schedule to the general ledger. There was not, however, documentation of a formal review or approval, outside of the schedule being maintained and reconciled. Similarly, the Hospital CFO completed the required reporting under the federal award based on the schedule discussed above, a lost revenue calculation, and other supporting documentation, but there was no formal review or approval process for that report. Management did also make regular reports to governance in monthly financial reports, including the use of COVID relief funds. These reports only covered more significant uses of funds and overall status updates on remaining funding, not a comprehensive report of all uses. The Hospital does have in place
review processes and controls over all expenditures (AP, Payroll), they are just not designed specifically to consider compliance with federal program.
Cause: Prior to the Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and ARP rural funding, the Hospital had not previously received federal awards in an amount sufficient to require an audit under Uniform Guidance. Therefore, more formal controls and procedures around the use of federal awards had not been in place. The American Rescue Plan, Provider Relief Fund, and certain other federal funds received in response to the COVID-19 pandemic were an unexpected occurrence. As the relief funds were distributed to the Hospital, the focus of Hospital management and governance was on responding to the pandemic, and tracking use of related relief funds, and not necessarily on incorporating formal policies and procedures due to the time sensitive nature of the pandemic.
Effect: Without formal control and review processes in place over use of federal funds or required reporting under those awards, there is a greater risk of improper use of funds or misstatement in required reporting.
Repeat finding: No
Recommendation: We recommend that management implement more formal control process surrounding the use of federal awards where there is segregation between individuals identifying or proposing expenditures/uses of funds and an individual reviewing and approving that expenditure/use. We also recommend for any formal reporting required under federal awards that there be a formal review process where an individual is reviewing and approving the report who did not prepare the report. Documentation of review and approval should be retained in both cases.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Federal program title: American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Fund (PRF)
Assistance Listing Number: 93.498
Award Period: Reporting Period 4 for funds received from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, used
through December 31, 2022
Type of Finding:
Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The Hospital did not have a process of review over the reporting of funds to HRSA, and as a result, reported interest earned on funds received that was materially incorrect.
Condition: The Hospital did not have a sufficient control or review process in place to ensure an accurate report on American Rescue Plan and Provider Relief Funds received from and submitted to HRSA. Specifically, there was an error in the interest calculation used for reporting to HRSA.
Context: As part of the submission process to HRSA on the American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Funds (PRF) received for Period 4, the Hospital imputed interest on the funds, which was required to be reported and justified with allowable costs or lost revenues. However, the interest calculation that the Hospital performed materially overstated the amount of interest received on the funds. The Hospital then justified those additional funds from interest received with sufficient expenses reported to HRSA. Since the amounts received from HRSA plus the interest earned on the funds are required to be reported on the SEFA, the SEFA was corrected for the reasonably stated interest earned amounts for the ARP and PRF.
Questioned Costs: Since interest income reported was only imputed and not actually received by the Hospital, there are no questioned costs.
Cause: The Hospital did not have a sufficient control process around preparation of the submission to HRSA for the American Rescue Plan and Provider Relief Fund.
Effect: The amount of ARP and PRF payments and expenses reported by the Hospital is materially overstated on the Hospital's Period 4 report to HRSA. Error specifically related to the reported interest earned on ARP Rural and PRF payments. Had the interest calculation been corrected in the reporting, it would not have impacted the total amount of funds retained and recognized by the Hospital.
Repeat finding: No
Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process for preparing and reviewing reports of funds from federal sources, especially pertaining to estimates.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Federal program title: American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Fund (PRF)
Assistance Listing Number: 93.498
Award Period: Reporting Period 4 for funds received from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, used
through December 31, 2022
Type of Finding:
Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The Hospital did not have a process of review over the reporting of funds to HRSA, and as a result, reported interest earned on funds received that was materially incorrect.
Condition: The Hospital did not have a sufficient control or review process in place to ensure an accurate report on American Rescue Plan and Provider Relief Funds received from and submitted to HRSA. Specifically, there was an error in the interest calculation used for reporting to HRSA.
Context: As part of the submission process to HRSA on the American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Funds (PRF) received for Period 4, the Hospital imputed interest on the funds, which was required to be reported and justified with allowable costs or lost revenues. However, the interest calculation that the Hospital performed materially overstated the amount of interest received on the funds. The Hospital then justified those additional funds from interest received with sufficient expenses reported to HRSA. Since the amounts received from HRSA plus the interest earned on the funds are required to be reported on the SEFA, the SEFA was corrected for the reasonably stated interest earned amounts for the ARP and PRF.
Questioned Costs: Since interest income reported was only imputed and not actually received by the Hospital, there are no questioned costs.
Cause: The Hospital did not have a sufficient control process around preparation of the submission to HRSA for the American Rescue Plan and Provider Relief Fund.
Effect: The amount of ARP and PRF payments and expenses reported by the Hospital is materially overstated on the Hospital's Period 4 report to HRSA. Error specifically related to the reported interest earned on ARP Rural and PRF payments. Had the interest calculation been corrected in the reporting, it would not have impacted the total amount of funds retained and recognized by the Hospital.
Repeat finding: No
Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process for preparing and reviewing reports of funds from federal sources, especially pertaining to estimates.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Federal program title: American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Fund (PRF)
Assistance Listing Number: 93.498
Award Period: Reporting Period 4 for funds received from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, used
through December 31, 2022
Type of Finding:
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The Hospital did not have documented formal controls and procedures over compliance with federal awards.
Condition: The Hospital did not have documented formal review processes over the use of the federal awards, or required reporting for the federal awards. Eligible uses of federal awards were tracked in detail and reviewed, but there was not a formal documented review process over whether expenditures were eligible under the federal award in all cases. Required reporting under the federal award was completed, but there was not a formal review or approval process in place.
Context: The Hospital maintained detailed records of eligible uses of federal funds for tracking and required reporting purposes. The Hospital's CFO maintained this schedule as eligible uses of funds were identified throughout the organization, reviewed activity, and reconciled the schedule to the general ledger. There was not, however, documentation of a formal review or approval, outside of the schedule being maintained and reconciled. Similarly, the Hospital CFO completed the required reporting under the federal award based on the schedule discussed above, a lost revenue calculation, and other supporting documentation, but there was no formal review or approval process for that report. Management did also make regular reports to governance in monthly financial reports, including the use of COVID relief funds. These reports only covered more significant uses of funds and overall status updates on remaining funding, not a comprehensive report of all uses. The Hospital does have in place
review processes and controls over all expenditures (AP, Payroll), they are just not designed specifically to consider compliance with federal program.
Cause: Prior to the Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and ARP rural funding, the Hospital had not previously received federal awards in an amount sufficient to require an audit under Uniform Guidance. Therefore, more formal controls and procedures around the use of federal awards had not been in place. The American Rescue Plan, Provider Relief Fund, and certain other federal funds received in response to the COVID-19 pandemic were an unexpected occurrence. As the relief funds were distributed to the Hospital, the focus of Hospital management and governance was on responding to the pandemic, and tracking use of related relief funds, and not necessarily on incorporating formal policies and procedures due to the time sensitive nature of the pandemic.
Effect: Without formal control and review processes in place over use of federal funds or required reporting under those awards, there is a greater risk of improper use of funds or misstatement in required reporting.
Repeat finding: No
Recommendation: We recommend that management implement more formal control process surrounding the use of federal awards where there is segregation between individuals identifying or proposing expenditures/uses of funds and an individual reviewing and approving that expenditure/use. We also recommend for any formal reporting required under federal awards that there be a formal review process where an individual is reviewing and approving the report who did not prepare the report. Documentation of review and approval should be retained in both cases.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Federal program title: American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Fund (PRF)
Assistance Listing Number: 93.498
Award Period: Reporting Period 4 for funds received from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, used
through December 31, 2022
Type of Finding:
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The Hospital did not have documented formal controls and procedures over compliance with federal awards.
Condition: The Hospital did not have documented formal review processes over the use of the federal awards, or required reporting for the federal awards. Eligible uses of federal awards were tracked in detail and reviewed, but there was not a formal documented review process over whether expenditures were eligible under the federal award in all cases. Required reporting under the federal award was completed, but there was not a formal review or approval process in place.
Context: The Hospital maintained detailed records of eligible uses of federal funds for tracking and required reporting purposes. The Hospital's CFO maintained this schedule as eligible uses of funds were identified throughout the organization, reviewed activity, and reconciled the schedule to the general ledger. There was not, however, documentation of a formal review or approval, outside of the schedule being maintained and reconciled. Similarly, the Hospital CFO completed the required reporting under the federal award based on the schedule discussed above, a lost revenue calculation, and other supporting documentation, but there was no formal review or approval process for that report. Management did also make regular reports to governance in monthly financial reports, including the use of COVID relief funds. These reports only covered more significant uses of funds and overall status updates on remaining funding, not a comprehensive report of all uses. The Hospital does have in place
review processes and controls over all expenditures (AP, Payroll), they are just not designed specifically to consider compliance with federal program.
Cause: Prior to the Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and ARP rural funding, the Hospital had not previously received federal awards in an amount sufficient to require an audit under Uniform Guidance. Therefore, more formal controls and procedures around the use of federal awards had not been in place. The American Rescue Plan, Provider Relief Fund, and certain other federal funds received in response to the COVID-19 pandemic were an unexpected occurrence. As the relief funds were distributed to the Hospital, the focus of Hospital management and governance was on responding to the pandemic, and tracking use of related relief funds, and not necessarily on incorporating formal policies and procedures due to the time sensitive nature of the pandemic.
Effect: Without formal control and review processes in place over use of federal funds or required reporting under those awards, there is a greater risk of improper use of funds or misstatement in required reporting.
Repeat finding: No
Recommendation: We recommend that management implement more formal control process surrounding the use of federal awards where there is segregation between individuals identifying or proposing expenditures/uses of funds and an individual reviewing and approving that expenditure/use. We also recommend for any formal reporting required under federal awards that there be a formal review process where an individual is reviewing and approving the report who did not prepare the report. Documentation of review and approval should be retained in both cases.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Federal program title: American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Fund (PRF)
Assistance Listing Number: 93.498
Award Period: Reporting Period 4 for funds received from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, used
through December 31, 2022
Type of Finding:
Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The Hospital did not have a process of review over the reporting of funds to HRSA, and as a result, reported interest earned on funds received that was materially incorrect.
Condition: The Hospital did not have a sufficient control or review process in place to ensure an accurate report on American Rescue Plan and Provider Relief Funds received from and submitted to HRSA. Specifically, there was an error in the interest calculation used for reporting to HRSA.
Context: As part of the submission process to HRSA on the American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Funds (PRF) received for Period 4, the Hospital imputed interest on the funds, which was required to be reported and justified with allowable costs or lost revenues. However, the interest calculation that the Hospital performed materially overstated the amount of interest received on the funds. The Hospital then justified those additional funds from interest received with sufficient expenses reported to HRSA. Since the amounts received from HRSA plus the interest earned on the funds are required to be reported on the SEFA, the SEFA was corrected for the reasonably stated interest earned amounts for the ARP and PRF.
Questioned Costs: Since interest income reported was only imputed and not actually received by the Hospital, there are no questioned costs.
Cause: The Hospital did not have a sufficient control process around preparation of the submission to HRSA for the American Rescue Plan and Provider Relief Fund.
Effect: The amount of ARP and PRF payments and expenses reported by the Hospital is materially overstated on the Hospital's Period 4 report to HRSA. Error specifically related to the reported interest earned on ARP Rural and PRF payments. Had the interest calculation been corrected in the reporting, it would not have impacted the total amount of funds retained and recognized by the Hospital.
Repeat finding: No
Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process for preparing and reviewing reports of funds from federal sources, especially pertaining to estimates.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Federal program title: American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Fund (PRF)
Assistance Listing Number: 93.498
Award Period: Reporting Period 4 for funds received from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, used
through December 31, 2022
Type of Finding:
Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters
Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The Hospital did not have a process of review over the reporting of funds to HRSA, and as a result, reported interest earned on funds received that was materially incorrect.
Condition: The Hospital did not have a sufficient control or review process in place to ensure an accurate report on American Rescue Plan and Provider Relief Funds received from and submitted to HRSA. Specifically, there was an error in the interest calculation used for reporting to HRSA.
Context: As part of the submission process to HRSA on the American Rescue Plan (ARP) and Provider Relief Funds (PRF) received for Period 4, the Hospital imputed interest on the funds, which was required to be reported and justified with allowable costs or lost revenues. However, the interest calculation that the Hospital performed materially overstated the amount of interest received on the funds. The Hospital then justified those additional funds from interest received with sufficient expenses reported to HRSA. Since the amounts received from HRSA plus the interest earned on the funds are required to be reported on the SEFA, the SEFA was corrected for the reasonably stated interest earned amounts for the ARP and PRF.
Questioned Costs: Since interest income reported was only imputed and not actually received by the Hospital, there are no questioned costs.
Cause: The Hospital did not have a sufficient control process around preparation of the submission to HRSA for the American Rescue Plan and Provider Relief Fund.
Effect: The amount of ARP and PRF payments and expenses reported by the Hospital is materially overstated on the Hospital's Period 4 report to HRSA. Error specifically related to the reported interest earned on ARP Rural and PRF payments. Had the interest calculation been corrected in the reporting, it would not have impacted the total amount of funds retained and recognized by the Hospital.
Repeat finding: No
Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process for preparing and reviewing reports of funds from federal sources, especially pertaining to estimates.
Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.