Audit 317110

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$3.28M
Findings
28
Programs
5
Organization: City of Hanley Falls (MN)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-08-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
481010 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
481011 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
481012 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
481013 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
481014 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
481015 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
481016 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
481017 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
481018 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
481019 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
481020 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
481021 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
481022 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
481023 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1057452 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1057453 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1057454 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1057455 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1057456 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1057457 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1057458 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1057459 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1057460 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1057461 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1057462 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1057463 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1057464 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes L
1057465 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P

Contacts

Name Title Type
CRDBDNVUJE15 Patricia Savoie Auditee
5077683570 Sara Oberloh Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note A - Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to requirement. The City of Hanley Falls has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City of Hanley Falls has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of City of Hanley Falls under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of operations of the City of Hanley Falls it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, change in net position, or cash flows of the City of Hanley Falls.
Title: Note B - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to requirement. The City of Hanley Falls has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City of Hanley Falls has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to requirement. The City of Hanley Falls has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Note C - Loans and Loan Guarantees Outstanding Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to requirement. The City of Hanley Falls has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City of Hanley Falls has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The City of Hanley Falls had been approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to receive loans in the amount of $2,553,500. The amount listed for the loans includes the beginning of the period loan balance plus proceeds used during the year. The balance owing at December 31, 2023 is $2,511,500.

Finding Details

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to prepare the financial statements and maintain a working knowledge of the required disclosures.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation that it is not cost effective for the City to maintain proper segregation of duties.