Audit 316900

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$7.94M
Findings
4
Programs
27
Organization: Roselle Public Schools (NJ)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-08-08

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
480682 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - L
480683 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - L
1057124 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - L
1057125 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund-Arp-Esser $1.36M Yes 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program-Cash Assistance $1.22M - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund-Esser II $764,821 Yes 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund-Njtss Mental Health Support Staffing $279,125 Yes 0
10.553 National School Lunch Program $242,963 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $217,036 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $198,667 - 0
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children $118,812 - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States-Idea Part B, Basic $114,481 Yes 1
84.287 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers $103,180 Yes 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program-Supply Chain Assistance $82,705 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund-Learning Acceleration $66,803 Yes 0
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants-Title Iia $51,027 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund-Evidence Based Summer Learning and Enrichment $40,000 Yes 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund-Accelerated Learning Coach and Educator Support $39,367 Yes 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund-Mental Health $36,000 Yes 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund-Cares Act-Union County Subgrant $28,760 Yes 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program-Non-Cash Assistance $20,124 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program-Cash in Lieu of Commodities $16,157 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund-Homeless Children and Youth (arp Hcy) $15,620 - 0
10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program $14,204 - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States-Idea Cclc-Supplemental $12,402 Yes 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program-Title IV $9,255 - 0
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants-Title III $8,007 - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $4,759 - 0
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants-Idea Part B, Preschool $4,712 Yes 0
16.540 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention_allocation to States $3,418 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
S917K4JVBLW1 Anthony Lamarco Auditee
9082982040 Dieter Lerch Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 8 DE MINIMIS INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: The schedules are prepared and presented using the budgetary basis of accounting with the exception of programs recorded in the food service fund, which are presented using the accrual basis of accounting. The information in these schedules is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (U.S. Uniform Guidance). De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Our audit indicated that expenditures and related unexpended carryover amounts, as reflected on the final grant exenditure reports submitted to the State were not in agreement with the District's budgetary reporting system.
Our audit indicated that expenditures and related unexpended carryover amounts, as reflected on the final grant exenditure reports submitted to the State were not in agreement with the District's budgetary reporting system.
Our audit indicated that expenditures and related unexpended carryover amounts, as reflected on the final grant exenditure reports submitted to the State were not in agreement with the District's budgetary reporting system.
Our audit indicated that expenditures and related unexpended carryover amounts, as reflected on the final grant exenditure reports submitted to the State were not in agreement with the District's budgetary reporting system.