Audit 31636

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$6.33M
Findings
20
Programs
10
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-10-24

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
36119 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes B
36120 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes B
36121 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes B
36122 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes B
36123 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes B
36124 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I
36125 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I
36126 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I
36127 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I
36128 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I
612561 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes B
612562 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes B
612563 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes B
612564 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes B
612565 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes B
612566 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I
612567 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I
612568 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I
612569 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I
612570 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.553 School Breakfast Program $409,966 Yes 1
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $194,736 - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $172,978 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $153,557 Yes 1
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $110,773 - 0
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children $48,301 Yes 1
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $47,721 - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $23,851 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $432 Yes 1
84.358 Rural Education $90 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LLD5YE7RLA85 Cathy Meher Auditee
5187755706 Christopher J. Healy, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis ofaccounting. The amounts reported as federal expenditures were obtained from the federalfinancial reports for the applicable program and periods. The amounts reported in these reportsare prepared from records maintained for each program, which are reconciled with the Districtsfinancial reporting system.The federal expenditures are recognized under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Gloversville Enlarged School District did not elect to use the 10% de minimus cost rate.Indirect costs may be included in the reported expenditures, to the extent that they are includedin the federal financial reports used as the source for the data presented. The Districts policy isnot to charge federal award programs with indirect costs. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) presents theactivity of federal award programs administered by the District, which is described in Note 1 tothe Districts accompanying financial statements, using the modified accrual basis of accounting.Therefore, some amounts presented in this Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, orused in the preparation of, the District financial statements. Federal awards that are included inthe Schedule may be received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards that arepassed through from other government agencies.The information presented in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements ofTitle 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, CostPrinciples, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). This Schedule onlypresents a selected portion of the operations of the District.
Title: Scope of Audit Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis ofaccounting. The amounts reported as federal expenditures were obtained from the federalfinancial reports for the applicable program and periods. The amounts reported in these reportsare prepared from records maintained for each program, which are reconciled with the Districtsfinancial reporting system.The federal expenditures are recognized under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Gloversville Enlarged School District did not elect to use the 10% de minimus cost rate.Indirect costs may be included in the reported expenditures, to the extent that they are includedin the federal financial reports used as the source for the data presented. The Districts policy isnot to charge federal award programs with indirect costs. The Gloversville Enlarged School District is an independent municipal corporation. All federalgrant operations of the District are included in the scope of the single audit.
Title: Non-Cash Assistance Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis ofaccounting. The amounts reported as federal expenditures were obtained from the federalfinancial reports for the applicable program and periods. The amounts reported in these reportsare prepared from records maintained for each program, which are reconciled with the Districtsfinancial reporting system.The federal expenditures are recognized under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Gloversville Enlarged School District did not elect to use the 10% de minimus cost rate.Indirect costs may be included in the reported expenditures, to the extent that they are includedin the federal financial reports used as the source for the data presented. The Districts policy isnot to charge federal award programs with indirect costs. Nonmonetary assistance is reported in the Schedule at the fair market value of the commoditiesreceived and disbursed. For the year ended June 30, 2022, the District received foodcommodities totaling $153,557.

Finding Details

Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Education Stabilization Funds Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Education CARES Act (Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D and 84.425C), CRRSA Act (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing No. 84.425D) and American Rescue Plan (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and Homeless Youth and Children Assistance Listing No. 84.425U and 84.425W) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.405 stipulates that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Statement of Condition: During our review of expenditures charged to the program, it was noted that certain expenditures were charged to the individual grants within the program incorrectly, were charged not in accordance with the individual grant budgets, or were not eligible expenditures of the grants. Statement of Cause: The District did not have appropriate internal controls over compliance to review expenditures claimed under each grant within the program in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.405. The District does not have an adequate review of expenditures charged to the major program, as a result, unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Questioned Cost: $185,324 ? see perspective information. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement procedures to review expenditures claimed under the program, and within each grant under the program, are allowable, charged to the correct grant, and are not already claimed. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Cathy Meher, the district treasurer, will review this with the responsible staff and will be more cognizant of the accounting procedures and review and ensure that accounts are accurately stated. This will begin immediately.Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over allowable costs, a selection of expenditures charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. The amount noted as questioned costs was included based on costs of $90,079 charged to the major program that were general expenditures of the District and should not have been charged to the major program. The remaining $95,155 noted as questioned costs were appropriately included in the program, but Incorrectly charged to the individual grants within the program. An adjustment was made to correct the errors.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, and COVD-19 Summer School Food Service Program CFDA No. 10.555, and 10.559) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws, and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of the major program, we noted that the District is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performing required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Cost: None. Repeat Finding: YesRecommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The district has entered into an agreement with Capital Region BOCES for the management of our school nutrition department. They will provide documentation that the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 are met and share that information with the district. This will be overseen by the food service director, Todd Barker. Perspective Information: As part of testing of compliance over procurement, a selection of vendors charged to the major program was selected for testing of compliance. Of the District?s vendors charged to the program, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.